IHRT vs NWSA vs SIRI vs FOX

For growth investors, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the stronger pick with 16.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI). Fox Corporation (FOX) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (12. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the cheapest at 11.

5x versus News Corporation at 13. 1x. On forward P/E, Sirius XM Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sirius XM Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 17x versus Fox Corporation's 0. 49x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Fox Corporation (FOX) delivered a total return of +59.

0%, compared to -75. 0% for iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NWSA returned +136. 3% versus IHRT's -68. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fox Corporation (FOX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

51β versus iHeartMedia, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning IHRT is approximately 245% more volatile than FOX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, News Corporation (NWSA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 84% for Sirius XM Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fox Corporation (FOX) is pulling ahead at 16.

6% versus -1. 6% for Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to 54. 3% for iHeartMedia, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOX leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

News Corporation (NWSA) is the more profitable company, earning 14.

0% net margin versus -12. 2% for iHeartMedia, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOX leads at 19. 8% versus -0. 5% for IHRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWSA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 17x versus Fox Corporation's 0. 49x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 7x for News Corporation — 17. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOX: 50. 4% to $85. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 0. 2% for iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

51), 1. 1% yield, +105. 3% 10Y return). iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOX: +105. 3%, IHRT: -68. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: IHRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NWSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SIRI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FOX is a mid-cap high-growth stock. NWSA, SIRI, FOX pay a dividend while IHRT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.