Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IIIV vs CSGS vs ALKT vs EVTC vs JKHY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
IIIV vs CSGS vs ALKT vs EVTC vs JKHY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $467M | $2.29B | $1.92B | $1.48B | $10.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $217M | $1.24B | $472M | $951M | $2.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18M | $64M | $-50M | $133M | $519M |
| Gross Margin | 58.2% | 48.3% | 57.4% | 46.4% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 0.7% | 13.9% | -9.3% | 19.1% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 18.7x | 15.9x | 23.0x | 6.1x | 21.3x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $587M | $354M | $1.13B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $67M | $180M | $63M | $306M | $102M |
IIIV vs CSGS vs ALKT vs EVTC vs JKHY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) | 100 | 63.6 | -36.4% |
| CSG Systems Interna… (CSGS) | 100 | 174.8 | +74.8% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 37.7 | -62.3% |
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 60.2 | -39.8% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 89.6 | -10.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IIIV vs CSGS vs ALKT vs EVTC vs JKHY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, IIIV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CSGS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.
- 114.6% 10Y total return vs JKHY's 94.7%
- Beta 0.42, yield 1.6%, current ratio 1.44x
- 1.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +25.3% vs ALKT's -39.0%
ALKT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth -12.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.5%
- 32.9% revenue growth vs IIIV's -7.3%
EVTC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, current ratio 2.07x
- PEG 0.68 vs CSGS's 9.33
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 21.3x), PEG 0.68 vs 2.11
JKHY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 1.5%
- 20.6% margin vs ALKT's -10.6%
- Beta 0.21 vs ALKT's 1.23
- 17.0% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 21.0% vs -8.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% revenue growth vs IIIV's -7.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 21.3x), PEG 0.68 vs 2.11 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs ALKT's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs ALKT's 1.23 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.3% vs ALKT's -39.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 21.0% vs -8.6% |
IIIV vs CSGS vs ALKT vs EVTC vs JKHY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IIIV vs CSGS vs ALKT vs EVTC vs JKHY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JKHY leads in 2 of 6 categories
EVTC leads 1 • CSGS leads 1 • IIIV leads 0 • ALKT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JKHY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JKHY is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 11.6x IIIV's $217M. JKHY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKT's -10.6%. On growth, ALKT holds the edge at +28.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $217M | $1.2B | $472M | $951M | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $30M | $225M | -$12M | $316M | $810M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18M | $64M | -$50M | $133M | $519M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $50M | $131M | $44M | $165M | $728M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.2% | +48.3% | +57.4% | +46.4% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +13.9% | -9.3% | +19.1% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +5.1% | -10.6% | +13.9% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +10.6% | +9.4% | +17.4% | +28.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.8% | +4.8% | +28.9% | +8.4% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +45.6% | -22.7% | -24.0% | +12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
EVTC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.9x trailing earnings, EVTC trades at a 73% valuation discount to CSGS's 40.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EVTC offers better value at 1.21x vs CSGS's 23.89x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $467M | $2.3B | $1.9B | $1.5B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $408M | $2.7B | $2.2B | $2.3B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.75x | 40.60x | -39.07x | 10.91x | 23.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.73x | 15.85x | 22.99x | 6.14x | 21.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 23.89x | — | 1.21x | 2.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.79x | 7.26x | — | 7.47x | 13.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.19x | 1.87x | 4.33x | 1.59x | 4.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.40x | 8.00x | 5.16x | 2.17x | 5.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 124.45x | 16.21x | 46.49x | 10.92x | 17.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-14 for ALKT. IIIV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSGS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVTC scores 7/9 vs ALKT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.7% | +22.0% | -14.0% | +18.7% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.9% | +4.3% | -5.9% | +6.1% | +17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | +32.5% | -8.6% | +10.2% | +21.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.7% | +33.7% | -9.3% | +10.5% | +22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 2.07x | 0.98x | 1.58x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$59M | $407M | $290M | $824M | -$102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $67M | $180M | $63M | $306M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $587M | $354M | $1.1B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.55x | 6.10x | -3.73x | 3.10x | 122.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CSGS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSGS five years ago would be worth $18,748 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,617 for ALKT. Over the past 12 months, CSGS leads with a +25.3% total return vs ALKT's -39.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSGS at 19.9% vs EVTC's -11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.3% | +5.2% | -20.8% | -16.1% | -17.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.4% | +25.3% | -39.0% | -31.8% | -17.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.0% | +72.4% | +45.5% | -29.9% | -1.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.0% | +87.5% | -53.8% | -41.8% | -1.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.2% | +114.6% | -58.2% | +94.4% | +94.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.5% | +19.9% | +13.3% | -11.2% | -0.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CSGS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALKT's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSGS currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs ALKT's 56.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | 0.42x | 1.23x | 0.77x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.97 | $80.67 | $31.66 | $38.56 | $193.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.89 | $60.54 | $14.11 | $21.82 | $141.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.2% | +99.6% | +56.8% | +62.3% | +75.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.5 | 59.1 | 56.2 | 21.5 | 36.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 301K | 344K | 1.7M | 453K | 903K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CSGS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IIIV as "Buy", CSGS as "Buy", ALKT as "Buy", EVTC as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.6% upside for EVTC (target: $34) vs 0.4% for CSGS (target: $81). For income investors, CSGS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.65% vs EVTC's 0.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.00 | $80.70 | $22.00 | $34.00 | $194.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 15 | 12 | 18 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% | — | +0.8% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.33 | — | $0.20 | $2.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.1% | +3.6% | 0.0% | +4.7% | +0.3% |
JKHY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EVTC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
IIIV vs CSGS vs ALKT vs EVTC vs JKHY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IIIV or CSGS or ALKT or EVTC or JKHY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the stronger pick with 32. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IIIV or CSGS or ALKT or EVTC or JKHY?
On trailing P/E, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the cheapest at 10. 9x versus CSG Systems International, Inc. at 40. 6x. On forward P/E, EVERTEC, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: EVERTEC, Inc. wins at 0. 68x versus CSG Systems International, Inc. 's 9. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IIIV or CSGS or ALKT or EVTC or JKHY?
Over the past 5 years, CSG Systems International, Inc.
(CSGS) delivered a total return of +87. 5%, compared to -53. 8% for Alkami Technology, Inc. (ALKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSGS returned +114. 6% versus ALKT's -58. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IIIV or CSGS or ALKT or EVTC or JKHY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Alkami Technology, Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning ALKT is approximately 479% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for CSG Systems International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IIIV or CSGS or ALKT or EVTC or JKHY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is pulling ahead at 32. 9% versus -7. 3% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: EVERTEC, Inc. grew EPS 27. 2% year-over-year, compared to -87. 9% for i3 Verticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKT leads at 29. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IIIV or CSGS or ALKT or EVTC or JKHY?
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 2% net margin versus -10. 7% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSGS leads at 24. 5% versus -12. 1% for ALKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKT leads at 57. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IIIV or CSGS or ALKT or EVTC or JKHY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 68x versus CSG Systems International, Inc. 's 9. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 23. 0x for Alkami Technology, Inc. — 16. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVTC: 41. 6% to $34. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IIIV or CSGS or ALKT or EVTC or JKHY?
In this comparison, CSGS (1.
6% yield), JKHY (1. 5% yield), EVTC (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. IIIV, ALKT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IIIV or CSGS or ALKT or EVTC or JKHY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +94. 7%, ALKT: -58. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IIIV and CSGS and ALKT and EVTC and JKHY?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IIIV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CSGS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock; EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CSGS, EVTC, JKHY pay a dividend while IIIV, ALKT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.