Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IMCR vs RCUS vs KYMR vs AGEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
IMCR vs RCUS vs KYMR vs AGEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.55B | $2.50B | $6.91B | $132M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $386M | $236M | $51M | $114M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $-369M | $-315M | $115K |
| Gross Margin | 98.8% | 90.7% | 33.2% | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | -168.6% | -7.0% | -17.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 1.8x |
| Total Debt | $44M | $99M | $82M | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $468M | $222M | $357M | $3M |
IMCR vs RCUS vs KYMR vs AGEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immunocore Holdings… (IMCR) | 100 | 63.3 | -36.7% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 70.3 | -29.7% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 176.4 | +76.4% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMCR vs RCUS vs KYMR vs AGEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMCR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.86
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 48.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.3%
- 20.0% revenue growth vs KYMR's -16.7%
- Beta 0.86 vs AGEN's 2.72
RCUS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +209.6% vs IMCR's +2.3%
KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 154.4% 10Y total return vs RCUS's 45.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
- Beta 1.15, current ratio 10.47x
AGEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 0.1% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
- 0.1% ROA vs RCUS's -35.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs KYMR's -16.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.1% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs AGEN's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +209.6% vs IMCR's +2.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs RCUS's -35.3% |
IMCR vs RCUS vs KYMR vs AGEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IMCR vs RCUS vs KYMR vs AGEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IMCR leads in 1 of 6 categories
AGEN leads 1 • KYMR leads 1 • RCUS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMCR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMCR is the larger business by revenue, generating $386M annually — 7.5x KYMR's $51M. AGEN is the more profitable business, keeping 0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $386M | $236M | $51M | $114M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | -$391M | -$352M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | -$369M | -$315M | $115,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | -$489M | -$244M | -$159M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +98.8% | +90.7% | +33.2% | +35.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.6% | -168.6% | -7.0% | -17.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | -156.4% | -6.1% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.0% | -2.1% | -4.7% | -139.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.6% | -39.3% | +55.5% | +27.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +157.5% | +10.5% | +13.4% | +85.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AGEN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $2.5B | $6.9B | $132M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $2.4B | $6.6B | $140M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -57.77x | -7.54x | -22.93x | -1102.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 1.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.22x | 10.11x | 176.26x | 1.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.05x | 4.22x | 4.52x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — IMCR and AGEN each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IMCR delivers a -4.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-5 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. KYMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCUS's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGEN scores 6/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.8% | -69.0% | -25.0% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.7% | -35.3% | -22.3% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -17.2% | -64.1% | -24.9% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.2% | -42.1% | -27.2% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.16x | 0.05x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$424M | -$123M | -$275M | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $468M | $222M | $357M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $44M | $99M | $82M | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.04x | -13.38x | -2119.53x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KYMR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KYMR five years ago would be worth $19,212 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $611 for AGEN. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs IMCR's +2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 45.0% vs AGEN's -51.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.4% | +6.5% | +16.3% | +16.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.3% | +209.6% | +190.7% | +27.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.9% | +24.9% | +205.1% | -88.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.0% | -18.6% | +92.1% | -93.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.1% | +45.9% | +154.4% | -94.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.0% | +7.7% | +45.0% | -51.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMCR and RCUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IMCR is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCUS currently trades 86.3% from its 52-week high vs AGEN's 51.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 1.95x | 1.15x | 2.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.72 | $28.72 | $103.00 | $7.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.44 | $7.06 | $28.06 | $2.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.2% | +86.3% | +82.2% | +51.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 60.5 | 54.1 | 48.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 409K | 1.2M | 602K | 814K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMCR as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 95.5% upside for AGEN (target: $7) vs 21.0% for RCUS (target: $30).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.00 | $30.00 | $117.06 | $7.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 18 | 26 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
IMCR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). AGEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
IMCR vs RCUS vs KYMR vs AGEN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMCR or RCUS or KYMR or AGEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Immunocore Holdings plc (IMCR) is the stronger pick with 20.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). Analysts rate Immunocore Holdings plc (IMCR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IMCR or RCUS or KYMR or AGEN?
Over the past 5 years, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) delivered a total return of +92. 1%, compared to -93. 9% for Agenus Inc. (AGEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KYMR returned +154. 4% versus AGEN's -94. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IMCR or RCUS or KYMR or AGEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Immunocore Holdings plc (IMCR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
86β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AGEN is approximately 216% more volatile than IMCR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 16% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IMCR or RCUS or KYMR or AGEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Immunocore Holdings plc (IMCR) is pulling ahead at 20.
0% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IMCR or RCUS or KYMR or AGEN?
Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 1% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMCR leads at -11. 3% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IMCR or RCUS or KYMR or AGEN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AGEN: 95.
5% to $7. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — IMCR or RCUS or KYMR or AGEN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is IMCR or RCUS or KYMR or AGEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Immunocore Holdings plc (IMCR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
86)). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IMCR: -29. 1%, AGEN: -94. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IMCR and RCUS and KYMR and AGEN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IMCR is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.