Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IMTX vs TCRT vs AGEN vs FATE vs CRIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
IMTX vs TCRT vs AGEN vs FATE vs CRIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.49B | $6M | $132M | $280M | $76M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $85M | $6K | $114M | $7M | $9M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-116M | $-4M | $115K | $-136M | $-8M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | -29.8% | 35.7% | — | 99.5% |
| Operating Margin | -167.8% | -678.8% | -17.7% | -22.2% | -348.4% |
| Forward P/E | 67.7x | — | 1.8x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $16M | $0.00 | $10M | $78M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $237M | $1M | $3M | $47M | $5M |
IMTX vs TCRT vs AGEN vs FATE vs CRIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immatics N.V. (IMTX) | 100 | 83.1 | -16.9% |
| Alaunos Therapeutic… (TCRT) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 5.0 | -95.0% |
| Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE) | 100 | 7.5 | -92.5% |
| Curis, Inc. (CRIS) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMTX vs TCRT vs AGEN vs FATE vs CRIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMTX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 188.6%, EPS growth 111.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.9%
- 16.0% 10Y total return vs FATE's 40.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.63, Low D/E 2.8%, current ratio 9.26x
- Beta 1.63, current ratio 9.26x
TCRT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.11
- Beta 1.11 vs AGEN's 2.72
AGEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 0.1% margin vs TCRT's -670.8%
- 0.1% ROA vs TCRT's -120.7%
FATE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, CRIS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 188.6% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.1% margin vs TCRT's -670.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs AGEN's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +153.8% vs CRIS's -72.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs TCRT's -120.7% |
IMTX vs TCRT vs AGEN vs FATE vs CRIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
IMTX vs TCRT vs AGEN vs FATE vs CRIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AGEN leads in 2 of 6 categories
IMTX leads 2 • TCRT leads 1 • FATE leads 0 • CRIS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGEN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $114M annually — 19032.7x TCRT's $6,000. AGEN is the more profitable business, keeping 0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TCRT's -670.8%. On growth, AGEN holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $85M | $6,000 | $114M | $7M | $9M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$130M | -$4M | -$10M | -$148M | -$33M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$116M | -$4M | $115,000 | -$136M | -$8M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$184M | -$3M | -$159M | -$88M | -$27M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | -29.8% | +35.7% | — | +99.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -167.8% | -678.8% | -17.7% | -22.2% | -3.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -136.7% | -670.8% | +0.1% | -20.5% | -80.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | -501.0% | -139.1% | -13.2% | -2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -89.7% | — | +27.5% | -26.4% | -66.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.8% | +21.4% | +85.3% | +38.6% | +198.4% |
Valuation Metrics
AGEN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $6M | $132M | $280M | $76M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $5M | $140M | $312M | $73M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 67.71x | -0.91x | -1102.94x | -2.11x | -0.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 1.79x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.16x | 582.19x | 1.16x | 42.18x | 8.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.76x | 2.07x | — | 1.39x | 13.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMTX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IMTX delivers a -27.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-28 in annual profit, vs $-168 for TCRT. IMTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FATE's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IMTX scores 6/9 vs FATE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.8% | -168.0% | — | -65.8% | -138.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -22.3% | -120.7% | +0.1% | -42.7% | -26.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -15.4% | -5.9% | — | -36.5% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.9% | -115.0% | — | -43.1% | -2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | — | — | 0.38x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$221M | -$1M | $7M | $31M | -$3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $237M | $1M | $3M | $47M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $0 | $10M | $78M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -124.10x | — | 1.11x | — | -107.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMTX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMTX five years ago would be worth $9,670 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $28 for CRIS. Over the past 12 months, IMTX leads with a +153.8% total return vs CRIS's -72.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMTX at 4.3% vs TCRT's -69.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.6% | -18.7% | +16.1% | +145.5% | -41.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +153.8% | -7.1% | +27.1% | +143.0% | -72.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.3% | -97.0% | -88.2% | -55.4% | -96.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.3% | -99.4% | -93.9% | -96.8% | -99.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.0% | -99.8% | -94.3% | +40.5% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.3% | -69.0% | -51.0% | -23.6% | -67.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TCRT and FATE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TCRT is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FATE currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs CRIS's 18.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.63x | 1.11x | 2.72x | 2.17x | 1.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.41 | $6.20 | $7.34 | $2.46 | $3.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.94 | $1.67 | $2.71 | $0.91 | $0.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.8% | +43.0% | +51.1% | +98.6% | +18.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.9 | 38.5 | 48.8 | 81.0 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 448K | 15K | 814K | 1.9M | 444K |
Analyst Outlook
TCRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMTX as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy", FATE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1525.5% upside for FATE (target: $40) vs 88.5% for IMTX (target: $21).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.00 | — | $7.33 | $39.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | — | 11 | 31 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AGEN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IMTX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
IMTX vs TCRT vs AGEN vs FATE vs CRIS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMTX or TCRT or AGEN or FATE or CRIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Immatics N.
V. (IMTX) is the stronger pick with 188. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Immatics N. V. (IMTX) offers the better valuation at 67. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immatics N. V. (IMTX) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IMTX or TCRT or AGEN or FATE or CRIS?
Over the past 5 years, Immatics N.
V. (IMTX) delivered a total return of -3. 3%, compared to -99. 7% for Curis, Inc. (CRIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FATE returned +40. 5% versus TCRT's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IMTX or TCRT or AGEN or FATE or CRIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alaunos Therapeutics, Inc.
(TCRT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AGEN is approximately 146% more volatile than TCRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immatics N. V. (IMTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 38% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IMTX or TCRT or AGEN or FATE or CRIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Immatics N.
V. (IMTX) is pulling ahead at 188. 6% versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Immatics N. V. grew EPS 111. 7% year-over-year, compared to 29. 9% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IMTX leads at 64. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IMTX or TCRT or AGEN or FATE or CRIS?
Immatics N.
V. (IMTX) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 8% net margin versus -467. 9% for Alaunos Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AGEN leads at -18. 0% versus -481. 2% for TCRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IMTX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IMTX or TCRT or AGEN or FATE or CRIS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FATE: 1525.
5% to $39. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — IMTX or TCRT or AGEN or FATE or CRIS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is IMTX or TCRT or AGEN or FATE or CRIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alaunos Therapeutics, Inc.
(TCRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11)). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TCRT: -99. 8%, AGEN: -94. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IMTX and TCRT and AGEN and FATE and CRIS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IMTX is a small-cap high-growth stock; TCRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.