Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IMVT vs PRAX vs ACAD vs RARE vs CRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
IMVT vs PRAX vs ACAD vs RARE vs CRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $5.53B | $9.63B | $3.86B | $2.57B | $8.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $-92K | $1.10B | $669M | $4.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-464M | $-327M | $376M | $-609M | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 91.5% | 83.6% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | 7.4% | -83.9% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 50.9x | — | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $98K | $110K | $52M | $1.28B | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $714M | $357M | $178M | $434M | $214M |
IMVT vs PRAX vs ACAD vs RARE vs CRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 62.4 | -37.6% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 48.6 | -51.4% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 26.0 | -74.0% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 79.9 | -20.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMVT vs PRAX vs ACAD vs RARE vs CRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 173.6% 10Y total return vs CRL's 119.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
- Beta 1.37, current ratio 11.16x
PRAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +7.7% vs RARE's -21.8%
ACAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- 34.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
- Beta 1.26 vs PRAX's 1.55
- 26.2% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs -89.4%
RARE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.42
- 20.1% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
CRL is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.1% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs RARE's -21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs -89.4% |
IMVT vs PRAX vs ACAD vs RARE vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IMVT vs PRAX vs ACAD vs RARE vs CRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories
CRL leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • IMVT leads 0 • RARE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRL and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $4.0B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, ACAD holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | -$92,000 | $1.1B | $669M | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$487M | -$357M | $96M | -$536M | $757M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$464M | -$327M | $376M | -$609M | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$423M | -$283M | $212M | -$487M | $391M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +91.5% | +83.6% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | +7.4% | -83.9% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | +34.3% | -91.0% | -4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | +19.4% | -72.8% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +9.7% | -2.4% | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.7% | +2.7% | -81.8% | -17.2% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CRL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CRL's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 26.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.5B | $9.6B | $3.9B | $2.6B | $9.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.8B | $9.3B | $3.7B | $3.4B | $11.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.97x | -24.72x | 9.85x | -4.48x | -62.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 50.91x | — | 16.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 26.91x | — | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 3.61x | 3.82x | 2.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.83x | 8.54x | 3.15x | — | 2.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 36.74x | — | 17.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRL's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -47.1% | -43.0% | +35.6% | -6.1% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.1% | -40.2% | +26.2% | -45.8% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -65.0% | +10.0% | -89.4% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -66.1% | -49.3% | +10.1% | -46.4% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.00x | 0.04x | — | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$714M | -$357M | -$126M | $842M | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $714M | $357M | $178M | $434M | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $98,000 | $110,000 | $52M | $1.3B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | -14.49x | 6.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs RARE's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.1% | +16.4% | -13.7% | +10.7% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +96.1% | +775.0% | +52.4% | -21.8% | +32.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.9% | +1976.5% | +4.7% | -44.5% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.4% | -20.8% | +7.1% | -77.2% | -46.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.6% | -20.1% | -22.9% | -59.4% | +119.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.1% | +174.9% | +1.5% | -17.8% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRAX and ACAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACAD is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs RARE's 61.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 1.55x | 1.26x | 1.42x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.09 | $356.00 | $27.81 | $42.37 | $228.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.36 | $35.18 | $14.45 | $18.29 | $131.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.5% | +93.6% | +81.1% | +61.7% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.2 | 55.6 | 44.2 | 66.6 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 378K | 1.8M | 1.8M | 806K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMVT as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.1% upside for RARE (target: $52) vs 12.9% for CRL (target: $205).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.50 | $544.40 | $34.78 | $51.50 | $205.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 16 | 37 | 33 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% |
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CRL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IMVT vs PRAX vs ACAD vs RARE vs CRL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMVT or PRAX or ACAD or RARE or CRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) is the stronger pick with 20. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (50. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMVT or PRAX or ACAD or RARE or CRL?
On forward P/E, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMVT or PRAX or ACAD or RARE or CRL?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -77. 2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +173. 6% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMVT or PRAX or ACAD or RARE or CRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 23% more volatile than ACAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 95% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMVT or PRAX or ACAD or RARE or CRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
(RARE) is pulling ahead at 20. 1% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMVT or PRAX or ACAD or RARE or CRL?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRL leads at 12. 6% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMVT or PRAX or ACAD or RARE or CRL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
(CRL) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 34. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RARE: 97. 1% to $51. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMVT or PRAX or ACAD or RARE or CRL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is IMVT or PRAX or ACAD or RARE or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+173. 6% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IMVT: +173. 6%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMVT and PRAX and ACAD and RARE and CRL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.