Steel
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
INHD vs RETO vs BTBT vs PESI vs CWST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction Materials
Financial - Capital Markets
Waste Management
Waste Management
INHD vs RETO vs BTBT vs PESI vs CWST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Construction Materials | Financial - Capital Markets | Waste Management | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $14M | $356K | $589M | $207M | $5.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $9M | $164M | $59M | $1.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-25M | $137M | $-18M | $7M |
| Gross Margin | 2.1% | 14.0% | 61.9% | 4.1% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | -83.6% | -237.8% | 16.8% | -26.3% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 9.2x | — | 63.9x |
| Total Debt | $50K | $110K | $14M | $4M | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $671K | $95M | $12M | $124M |
INHD vs RETO vs BTBT vs PESI vs CWST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inno Holdings Inc. (INHD) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| ReTo Eco-Solutions,… (RETO) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 43.3 | -56.7% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 142.1 | +42.1% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 100.0 | -0.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INHD vs RETO vs BTBT vs PESI vs CWST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INHD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.2%
- 5.8% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5%
Among these 5 stocks, RETO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (9.2x vs 63.9x)
- 17.3% margin vs RETO's -291.9%
- 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 19.0% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC 6.5% vs -14.5%
PESI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +26.2% vs INHD's -99.9%
CWST is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.32
- 10.6% 10Y total return vs PESI's 178.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 79.0%, current ratio 1.26x
- Beta 0.32, current ratio 1.26x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 63.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs RETO's -291.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.2% vs INHD's -99.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC 6.5% vs -14.5% |
INHD vs RETO vs BTBT vs PESI vs CWST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INHD vs RETO vs BTBT vs PESI vs CWST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories
RETO leads 1 • PESI leads 1 • INHD leads 0 • CWST leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 411.6x INHD's $5M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RETO's -2.9%. On growth, INHD holds the edge at +94.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $9M | $164M | $59M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$19M | $166M | -$14M | $414M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$25M | $137M | -$18M | $7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$7M | -$448M | -$14M | $102M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +14.0% | +61.9% | +4.1% | +17.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -83.6% | -2.4% | +16.8% | -26.3% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -86.8% | -2.9% | +17.3% | -30.1% | +0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -77.8% | -65.3% | -23.4% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.9% | +49.0% | — | -20.1% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.7% | +98.8% | +2.8% | -110.5% | -18.6% |
Valuation Metrics
RETO leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, BTBT trades at a 99% valuation discount to CWST's 712.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BTBT's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CWST's 15.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $355,799 | $589M | $207M | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | -$205,956 | $508M | $200M | $6.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.28x | -0.04x | 9.15x | -14.89x | 712.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 63.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 8.49x | — | 15.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.83x | 0.19x | 3.60x | 3.36x | 2.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.60x | 0.01x | 0.56x | 4.11x | 3.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 63.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-183 for RETO. INHD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWST's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INHD scores 6/9 vs CWST's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.5% | -183.4% | +21.4% | -34.5% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.3% | -75.1% | +19.0% | -20.2% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -99.5% | -14.5% | +6.5% | -21.7% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -47.4% | -21.6% | +8.5% | -16.7% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.00x | 0.03x | 0.09x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | -$561,755 | -$81M | -$7M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $671,355 | $95M | $12M | $124M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50,000 | $109,600 | $14M | $4M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -31.78x | — | -42.14x | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PESI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,563 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for INHD. Over the past 12 months, PESI leads with a +26.2% total return vs INHD's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PESI at 6.8% vs INHD's -97.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -93.5% | -66.1% | -10.3% | -8.8% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | -95.9% | -9.0% | +26.2% | -28.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.9% | -19.7% | +21.7% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -100.0% | -84.6% | +45.6% | +25.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -100.0% | -60.4% | +178.6% | +1059.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -97.1% | -92.0% | -7.1% | +6.8% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INHD and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INHD is the less volatile stock with a -0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWST currently trades 70.5% from its 52-week high vs INHD's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.85x | 1.77x | 3.37x | 1.85x | 0.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9494.40 | $19.55 | $4.55 | $16.50 | $121.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.38 | $0.48 | $1.25 | $8.02 | $74.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.0% | +3.3% | +40.2% | +67.7% | +70.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 23.4 | 43.5 | 69.1 | 41.5 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 920K | 18.5M | 164K | 874K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PESI and CWST each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", PESI as "Hold", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 39.3% for CWST (target: $119). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $5.00 | $18.00 | $119.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 2 | 1 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.01 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RETO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
INHD vs RETO vs BTBT vs PESI vs CWST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INHD or RETO or BTBT or PESI or CWST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INHD or RETO or BTBT or PESI or CWST?
On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INHD or RETO or BTBT or PESI or CWST?
Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) delivered a total return of +45. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Inno Holdings Inc. (INHD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus RETO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INHD or RETO or BTBT or PESI or CWST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Inno Holdings Inc.
(INHD) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 85β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately -498% more volatile than INHD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Inno Holdings Inc. (INHD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 79% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INHD or RETO or BTBT or PESI or CWST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 8% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INHD or RETO or BTBT or PESI or CWST?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -456. 7% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -225. 9% for RETO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INHD or RETO or BTBT or PESI or CWST more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 173.
2% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — INHD or RETO or BTBT or PESI or CWST?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. INHD, RETO, PESI, CWST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is INHD or RETO or BTBT or PESI or CWST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Inno Holdings Inc.
(INHD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 85)). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INHD: -100. 0%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INHD and RETO and BTBT and PESI and CWST?
These companies operate in different sectors (INHD (Basic Materials) and RETO (Basic Materials) and BTBT (Financial Services) and PESI (Industrials) and CWST (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: INHD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RETO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.