Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

INHD vs RETO vs BTBT vs PESI vs CWST

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
INHD
Inno Holdings Inc.

Steel

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$14M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.

Construction Materials

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$356K
5Y Perf.-99.6%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.-56.7%
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+42.1%
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.35B
5Y Perf.-0.0%

INHD vs RETO vs BTBT vs PESI vs CWST — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
INHD logoINHD
RETO logoRETO
BTBT logoBTBT
PESI logoPESI
CWST logoCWST
IndustrySteelConstruction MaterialsFinancial - Capital MarketsWaste ManagementWaste Management
Market Cap$14M$356K$589M$207M$5.35B
Revenue (TTM)$5M$9M$164M$59M$1.88B
Net Income (TTM)$-4M$-25M$137M$-18M$7M
Gross Margin2.1%14.0%61.9%4.1%17.4%
Operating Margin-83.6%-237.8%16.8%-26.3%4.5%
Forward P/E9.2x63.9x
Total Debt$50K$110K$14M$4M$1.24B
Cash & Equiv.$10M$671K$95M$12M$124M

INHD vs RETO vs BTBT vs PESI vs CWSTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

INHD
RETO
BTBT
PESI
CWST
StockDec 23May 26Return
Inno Holdings Inc. (INHD)1000.0-100.0%
ReTo Eco-Solutions,… (RETO)1000.4-99.6%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10043.3-56.7%
Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI)100142.1+42.1%
Casella Waste Syste… (CWST)100100.0-0.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: INHD vs RETO vs BTBT vs PESI vs CWST

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Inno Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. PESI and CWST also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
INHD
Inno Holdings Inc.
The Growth Play

INHD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.2%
  • 5.8% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5%
Best for: growth exposure
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
The Basic Materials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, RETO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: basic materials exposure
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (9.2x vs 63.9x)
  • 17.3% margin vs RETO's -291.9%
  • 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 19.0% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC 6.5% vs -14.5%
Best for: value and quality
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PESI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +26.2% vs INHD's -99.9%
Best for: momentum
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
The Income Pick

CWST is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.32
  • 10.6% 10Y total return vs PESI's 178.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 79.0%, current ratio 1.26x
  • Beta 0.32, current ratio 1.26x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthINHD logoINHD5.8% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5%
ValueBTBT logoBTBTLower P/E (9.2x vs 63.9x)
Quality / MarginsBTBT logoBTBT17.3% margin vs RETO's -291.9%
Stability / SafetyCWST logoCWSTBeta 0.32 vs BTBT's 3.37
DividendsBTBT logoBTBT0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PESI logoPESI+26.2% vs INHD's -99.9%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC 6.5% vs -14.5%

INHD vs RETO vs BTBT vs PESI vs CWST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

INHDInno Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Product
100.0%$3M
RETOReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
FY 2024
Technology Equipment
100.0%$652,906
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260
PESIPerma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Segments Total
50.0%$62M
Treatment
36.6%$45M
Services
13.4%$17M
CWSTCasella Waste Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Collection
74.3%$1.2B
Processing Services
8.9%$144M
Transfer
8.8%$143M
Landfill Revenue
6.1%$98M
Transportation
1.4%$23M
Landfill - Gas To Energy
0.5%$8M

INHD vs RETO vs BTBT vs PESI vs CWST — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBTBTLAGGINGCWST

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CWST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 411.6x INHD's $5M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RETO's -2.9%. On growth, INHD holds the edge at +94.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricINHD logoINHDInno Holdings Inc.RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5M$9M$164M$59M$1.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$4M-$19M$166M-$14M$414M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$4M-$25M$137M-$18M$7M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$10M-$7M-$448M-$14M$102M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+2.1%+14.0%+61.9%+4.1%+17.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-83.6%-2.4%+16.8%-26.3%+4.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-86.8%-2.9%+17.3%-30.1%+0.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.1%-77.8%-65.3%-23.4%+5.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+94.9%+49.0%-20.1%+9.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+92.7%+98.8%+2.8%-110.5%-18.6%
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

RETO leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 9.2x trailing earnings, BTBT trades at a 99% valuation discount to CWST's 712.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BTBT's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CWST's 15.7x.

MetricINHD logoINHDInno Holdings Inc.RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Market CapShares × price$14M$355,799$589M$207M$5.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4M-$205,956$508M$200M$6.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.28x-0.04x9.15x-14.89x712.08x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.63.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.49x15.74x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.83x0.19x3.60x3.36x2.91x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.60x0.01x0.56x4.11x3.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF63.17x
RETO leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-183 for RETO. INHD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWST's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INHD scores 6/9 vs CWST's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricINHD logoINHDInno Holdings Inc.RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-13.5%-183.4%+21.4%-34.5%+0.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-13.3%-75.1%+19.0%-20.2%+0.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-99.5%-14.5%+6.5%-21.7%+2.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-47.4%-21.6%+8.5%-16.7%+2.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965654
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.00x0.03x0.09x0.79x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$10M-$561,755-$81M-$7M$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$10M$671,355$95M$12M$124M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$50,000$109,600$14M$4M$1.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-31.78x-42.14x1.12x
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PESI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,563 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for INHD. Over the past 12 months, PESI leads with a +26.2% total return vs INHD's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PESI at 6.8% vs INHD's -97.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricINHD logoINHDInno Holdings Inc.RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-93.5%-66.1%-10.3%-8.8%-13.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-99.9%-95.9%-9.0%+26.2%-28.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-99.9%-19.7%+21.7%-6.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-100.0%-84.6%+45.6%+25.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-100.0%-60.4%+178.6%+1059.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-97.1%-92.0%-7.1%+6.8%-2.2%
PESI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — INHD and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

INHD is the less volatile stock with a -0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWST currently trades 70.5% from its 52-week high vs INHD's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricINHD logoINHDInno Holdings Inc.RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.85x1.77x3.37x1.85x0.32x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9494.40$19.55$4.55$16.50$121.24
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.38$0.48$1.25$8.02$74.05
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.0%+3.3%+40.2%+67.7%+70.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10023.443.569.141.552.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.3M920K18.5M164K874K
Evenly matched — INHD and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — PESI and CWST each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", PESI as "Hold", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 39.3% for CWST (target: $119). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricINHD logoINHDInno Holdings Inc.RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.00$18.00$119.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2119
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises011
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — PESI and CWST each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RETO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallBit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

INHD vs RETO vs BTBT vs PESI vs CWST: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is INHD or RETO or BTBT or PESI or CWST a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — INHD or RETO or BTBT or PESI or CWST?

On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — INHD or RETO or BTBT or PESI or CWST?

Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.

(PESI) delivered a total return of +45. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Inno Holdings Inc. (INHD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus RETO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — INHD or RETO or BTBT or PESI or CWST?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Inno Holdings Inc.

(INHD) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 85β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately -498% more volatile than INHD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Inno Holdings Inc. (INHD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 79% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — INHD or RETO or BTBT or PESI or CWST?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 8% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — INHD or RETO or BTBT or PESI or CWST?

Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -456. 7% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -225. 9% for RETO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is INHD or RETO or BTBT or PESI or CWST more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 173.

2% to $5. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — INHD or RETO or BTBT or PESI or CWST?

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. INHD, RETO, PESI, CWST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is INHD or RETO or BTBT or PESI or CWST better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Inno Holdings Inc.

(INHD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 85)). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INHD: -100. 0%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between INHD and RETO and BTBT and PESI and CWST?

These companies operate in different sectors (INHD (Basic Materials) and RETO (Basic Materials) and BTBT (Financial Services) and PESI (Industrials) and CWST (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: INHD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RETO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

INHD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 47%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RETO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PESI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CWST

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform INHD and RETO and BTBT and PESI and CWST on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(INHD: 94.9% · RETO: 49.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.