INN vs PEB vs APLE vs RLJ

For growth investors, Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (PEB) is the stronger pick with 1.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ). Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) offers the better valuation at 18. 8x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. (INN) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.

(APLE) is the cheapest at 18. 8x versus RLJ Lodging Trust at 597. 6x.

Over the past 5 years, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.

(APLE) delivered a total return of +13. 7%, compared to -37. 7% for Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (PEB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APLE returned +17. 6% versus RLJ's -29. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.

(APLE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus Pebblebrook Hotel Trust's 1. 36β — meaning PEB is approximately 59% more volatile than APLE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 111% for Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (PEB) is pulling ahead at 1.

5% versus -1. 4% for RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. grew EPS -16. 9% year-over-year, compared to -215. 8% for Summit Hotel Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APLE leads at 4. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.

(APLE) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus -4. 5% for Pebblebrook Hotel Trust — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APLE leads at 17. 7% versus 5. 1% for PEB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — APLE leads at 6. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APLE: 0.

8% to $14. 00.

In this comparison, APLE (6.

9% yield), RLJ (6. 9% yield), PEB (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. INN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.

(APLE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85), 6. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (APLE: +17. 6%, PEB: -27. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: INN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PEB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APLE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RLJ is a small-cap income-oriented stock. APLE, RLJ pay a dividend while INN, PEB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.