REIT - Hotel & Motel
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
INN vs RLJ vs APLE vs SHO vs CLDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
REIT - Hotel & Motel
REIT - Hotel & Motel
REIT - Hotel & Motel
INN vs RLJ vs APLE vs SHO vs CLDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel |
| Market Cap | $588M | $1.34B | $3.28B | $1.93B | $469M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $730M | $1.36B | $1.42B | $986M | $294M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-16M | $25M | $172M | $38M | $9M |
| Gross Margin | -16.6% | 1.4% | 30.5% | 20.1% | -3.6% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 9.5% | 17.6% | 8.8% | 9.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 597.6x | 20.6x | 131.1x | 71.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.42B | $2.32B | $1.77B | $925M | $359M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $410M | $39M | $109M | $33M |
INN vs RLJ vs APLE vs SHO vs CLDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summit Hotel Proper… (INN) | 100 | 86.4 | -13.6% |
| RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) | 100 | 85.8 | -14.2% |
| Apple Hospitality R… (APLE) | 100 | 136.0 | +36.0% |
| Sunstone Hotel Inve… (SHO) | 100 | 116.9 | +16.9% |
| Chatham Lodging Tru… (CLDT) | 100 | 147.9 | +47.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INN vs RLJ vs APLE vs SHO vs CLDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RLJ is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 6.9%
APLE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 17.6% 10Y total return vs SHO's 11.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 56.4%, current ratio 0.27x
- Beta 0.85, yield 6.9%, current ratio 0.27x
- Lower P/E (20.6x vs 71.3x)
SHO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth -69.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.7%
- 6.0% FFO/revenue growth vs CLDT's -7.0%
CLDT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +48.1% vs APLE's +30.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.0% FFO/revenue growth vs CLDT's -7.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.6x vs 71.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.1% margin vs INN's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs INN's 1.35, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.9% yield, vs RLJ's 6.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.1% vs APLE's +30.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.5% ROA vs INN's -0.6%, ROIC 3.9% vs 1.7% |
INN vs RLJ vs APLE vs SHO vs CLDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INN vs RLJ vs APLE vs SHO vs CLDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
APLE leads in 2 of 6 categories
INN leads 1 • RLJ leads 0 • SHO leads 0 • CLDT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APLE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APLE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 4.8x CLDT's $294M. APLE is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INN's -2.2%. On growth, SHO holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $730M | $1.4B | $1.4B | $986M | $294M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $242M | $316M | $444M | $190M | $87M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$16M | $25M | $172M | $38M | $9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $132M | $254M | $320M | $132M | $60M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -16.6% | +1.4% | +30.5% | +20.1% | -3.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +9.5% | +17.6% | +8.8% | +9.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +1.8% | +12.1% | +3.8% | +3.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +18.6% | +22.5% | +13.4% | +20.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.3% | +3.6% | +3.1% | +11.0% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -150.0% | -150.0% | -7.7% | +7.0% | -8.2% |
Valuation Metrics
INN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.8x trailing earnings, APLE trades at a 97% valuation discount to RLJ's 597.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLDT's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHO's 13.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $588M | $1.3B | $3.3B | $1.9B | $469M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $3.2B | $5.0B | $2.7B | $796M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -24.55x | 597.64x | 18.76x | 244.56x | 71.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 20.57x | 131.12x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.35x | 10.40x | 11.31x | 13.10x | 9.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.81x | 1.00x | 2.32x | 2.01x | 1.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.45x | 0.61x | 1.05x | 1.03x | 0.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.99x | 11.45x | 11.59x | 24.48x | 11.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
APLE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APLE delivers a 5.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-1 for INN. CLDT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INN's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RLJ scores 6/9 vs SHO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.3% | +1.1% | +5.4% | +1.9% | +1.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +0.5% | +3.5% | +1.3% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | +2.3% | +3.9% | +2.0% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +2.8% | +5.3% | +2.5% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 1.06x | 0.56x | 0.48x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $1.9B | $1.7B | $816M | $326M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $410M | $39M | $109M | $33M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $2.3B | $1.8B | $925M | $359M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.87x | 1.18x | 2.97x | 1.58x | 1.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — APLE and SHO and CLDT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APLE five years ago would be worth $11,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,387 for INN. Over the past 12 months, CLDT leads with a +48.1% total return vs APLE's +30.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHO at 3.4% vs INN's -2.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.5% | +17.6% | +17.8% | +14.3% | +48.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.5% | +33.4% | +30.7% | +31.0% | +48.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.0% | -3.0% | +10.0% | +10.6% | +8.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.1% | -34.5% | +13.7% | -9.5% | -17.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.1% | -29.9% | +17.6% | +11.5% | -29.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.4% | -1.0% | +3.2% | +3.4% | +2.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — APLE and SHO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
APLE is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INN's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHO currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs INN's 90.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 0.99x | 0.85x | 1.00x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.00 | $8.96 | $14.11 | $10.39 | $10.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.98 | $6.54 | $10.85 | $8.14 | $6.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.0% | +98.7% | +98.4% | +99.6% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.7 | 72.3 | 74.9 | 70.3 | 61.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 2.3M | 3.2M | 1.6M | 280K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RLJ and APLE and SHO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INN as "Buy", RLJ as "Hold", APLE as "Buy", SHO as "Hold", CLDT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.2% upside for CLDT (target: $11) vs -32.2% for RLJ (target: $6). For income investors, APLE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.92% vs SHO's 4.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.17 | $6.00 | $14.00 | $10.50 | $11.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 18 | 17 | 28 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.9% | +6.9% | +4.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.61 | $0.96 | $0.44 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +2.4% | +1.9% | +5.6% | +1.9% |
APLE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). INN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
INN vs RLJ vs APLE vs SHO vs CLDT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INN or RLJ or APLE or SHO or CLDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) offers the better valuation at 18. 8x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. (INN) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INN or RLJ or APLE or SHO or CLDT?
On trailing P/E, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
(APLE) is the cheapest at 18. 8x versus RLJ Lodging Trust at 597. 6x. On forward P/E, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INN or RLJ or APLE or SHO or CLDT?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
(APLE) delivered a total return of +13. 7%, compared to -36. 1% for Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. (INN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APLE returned +17. 6% versus RLJ's -29. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INN or RLJ or APLE or SHO or CLDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
(APLE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning INN is approximately 59% more volatile than APLE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 111% for Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INN or RLJ or APLE or SHO or CLDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus -7. 0% for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chatham Lodging Trust grew EPS 275. 0% year-over-year, compared to -215. 8% for Summit Hotel Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APLE leads at 4. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INN or RLJ or APLE or SHO or CLDT?
Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
(APLE) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus -1. 1% for Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APLE leads at 17. 7% versus 7. 8% for SHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — APLE leads at 6. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INN or RLJ or APLE or SHO or CLDT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
(APLE) trades at 20. 6x forward P/E versus 131. 1x for Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. — 110. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLDT: 10. 2% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — INN or RLJ or APLE or SHO or CLDT?
In this comparison, APLE (6.
9% yield), RLJ (6. 9% yield), SHO (4. 3% yield) pay a dividend. INN, CLDT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is INN or RLJ or APLE or SHO or CLDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
(APLE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85), 6. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (APLE: +17. 6%, INN: -28. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INN and RLJ and APLE and SHO and CLDT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: INN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RLJ is a small-cap income-oriented stock; APLE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SHO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CLDT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. RLJ, APLE, SHO pay a dividend while INN, CLDT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.