INSE
Inspired Entertainment, Inc.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$219M
5Y Perf.+201.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
INSE vs NCLH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NCLH
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
Travel Services
Market Cap$7.91B
5Y Perf.+10.0%
INSE vs NCLH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | INSE | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $219M | $7.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $301M | $10.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $568M |
| Gross Margin | 58.9% | 43.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.9% | 15.9% |
| Forward P/E | 20.8x | 8.2x |
| Total Debt | $372M | $14.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | $210M |
INSE vs NCLH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
INSE
NCLH
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inspired Entertainm… (INSE) | 100 | 301.1 | +201.1% |
| Norwegian Cruise Li… (NCLH) | 100 | 110.0 | +10.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INSE vs NCLH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: NCLH leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Inspired Entertainment, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
INSE
Inspired Entertainment, Inc.
The Income Pick
INSE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.77
- -17.9% 10Y total return vs NCLH's -65.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.77, current ratio 2.23x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
NCLH
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
The Growth Play
NCLH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth -52.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.6%
- 3.7% revenue growth vs INSE's 2.4%
- Lower P/E (8.2x vs 20.8x)
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NCLH | 3.7% revenue growth vs INSE's 2.4% |
| Value | NCLH | Lower P/E (8.2x vs 20.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | NCLH | 5.7% margin vs INSE's -5.8% |
| Stability / Safety | INSE | Beta 1.77 vs NCLH's 2.26 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | INSE | +8.4% vs NCLH's -0.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NCLH | 2.5% ROA vs INSE's -3.8%, ROIC 7.5% vs 8.8% |
INSE vs NCLH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
INSE vs NCLH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLINSELAGGINGNCLH
NCLHNorwegian Cruise Line…
1leads
INSEInspired Entertainmen…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs NCLHMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
NCLH3/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
INSE3/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
INSE5/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
INSE4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
INSE2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NCLH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NCLH is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.0B annually — 33.3x INSE's $301M. NCLH is the more profitable business, keeping 5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INSE's -5.8%. On growth, NCLH holds the edge at +9.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | INSEInspired Entertai… | NCLHNorwegian Cruise … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $301M | $10.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $72M | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | $568M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | -$949M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.9% | +43.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +15.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | +5.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | -9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.3% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +3.5% |
NCLH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
INSE leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, INSE's 5.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NCLH's 8.1x.
| Metric | INSEInspired Entertai… | NCLHNorwegian Cruise … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $219M | $7.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $549M | $22.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.97x | 19.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.76x | 8.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.83x | 8.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.72x | 0.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.45x | — |
INSE leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSE leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NCLH scores 6/9 vs INSE's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | INSEInspired Entertai… | NCLHNorwegian Cruise … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +27.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.8% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.8% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.5% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 6.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $330M | $14.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | $210M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $372M | $14.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.74x | 1.60x |
INSE leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSE five years ago would be worth $9,552 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,046 for NCLH. Over the past 12 months, INSE leads with a +8.4% total return vs NCLH's -0.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NCLH at 6.5% vs INSE's -13.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | INSEInspired Entertai… | NCLHNorwegian Cruise … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.7% | -24.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.4% | -0.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.6% | +20.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.5% | -39.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.9% | -65.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.2% | +6.5% |
INSE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INSE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INSE is the less volatile stock with a 1.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NCLH's 2.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INSE currently trades 81.4% from its 52-week high vs NCLH's 63.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | INSEInspired Entertai… | NCLHNorwegian Cruise … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.77x | 2.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.95 | $27.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.10 | $16.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.4% | +63.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.9 | 42.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 127K | 21.8M |
INSE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates INSE as "Buy" and NCLH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.5% upside for INSE (target: $19) vs 40.4% for NCLH (target: $24).
| Metric | INSEInspired Entertai… | NCLHNorwegian Cruise … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.75 | $24.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.3% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
INSE leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NCLH leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
Best OverallInspired Entertainment, Inc. (INSE)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
INSE vs NCLH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INSE or NCLH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
(NCLH) is the stronger pick with 3. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for Inspired Entertainment, Inc. (INSE). Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) offers the better valuation at 19. 1x trailing P/E (8. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Inspired Entertainment, Inc. (INSE) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INSE or NCLH?
On forward P/E, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
is actually cheaper at 8. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INSE or NCLH?
Over the past 5 years, Inspired Entertainment, Inc.
(INSE) delivered a total return of -4. 5%, compared to -39. 5% for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSE returned -17. 9% versus NCLH's -65. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INSE or NCLH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Inspired Entertainment, Inc.
(INSE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 77β versus Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. 's 2. 26β — meaning NCLH is approximately 27% more volatile than INSE relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — INSE or NCLH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
(NCLH) is pulling ahead at 3. 7% versus 2. 4% for Inspired Entertainment, Inc. (INSE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. grew EPS -52. 4% year-over-year, compared to -126. 1% for Inspired Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NCLH leads at 26. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INSE or NCLH?
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
(NCLH) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 3% net margin versus -5. 6% for Inspired Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NCLH leads at 16. 2% versus 12. 2% for INSE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSE leads at 54. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INSE or NCLH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
(NCLH) trades at 8. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for Inspired Entertainment, Inc. — 12. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INSE: 131. 5% to $18. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — INSE or NCLH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is INSE or NCLH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Inspired Entertainment, Inc.
(INSE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSE: -17. 9%, NCLH: -65. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INSE and NCLH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(INSE: -5.3% · NCLH: 9.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Closest Rival
Compare NCLH vs CCL
CCL is one of the most direct listed alternatives to NCLH.
Segment Rival
Compare INSE vs LNW
LNW overlaps with INSE in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand Peer Set
Expand With MGM + CCL
MGM and CCL are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.