INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$4.46B
5Y Perf.+297.6%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
INSW vs XOM vs CVX vs BP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$620.85B
5Y Perf.+222.2%
CVX
Chevron Corporation
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$364.18B
5Y Perf.+99.0%
BP
BP p.l.c.
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$114.36B
5Y Perf.+89.3%
INSW vs XOM vs CVX vs BP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | INSW | XOM | CVX | BP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $4.46B | $620.85B | $364.18B | $114.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $676M | $323.90B | $184.43B | $194.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $546M | $28.84B | $12.30B | $3.20B |
| Gross Margin | 40.6% | 21.7% | 30.4% | 19.3% |
| Operating Margin | 44.4% | 10.5% | 9.0% | 10.7% |
| Forward P/E | 8.5x | 14.8x | 15.0x | 8.5x |
| Total Debt | $576M | $43.54B | $46.74B | $84.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $117M | $10.68B | $6.47B | $36.56B |
INSW vs XOM vs CVX vs BP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
INSW
XOM
CVX
BP
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 397.6 | +297.6% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 322.2 | +222.2% |
| Chevron Corporation (CVX) | 100 | 199.0 | +99.0% |
| BP p.l.c. (BP) | 100 | 189.3 | +89.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INSW vs XOM vs CVX vs BP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: INSW leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. BP p.l.c. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. XOM also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 10.1% 10Y total return vs CVX's 135.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 28.5%, current ratio 3.71x
- Lower P/E (8.5x vs 15.0x)
- 80.8% margin vs BP's 1.6%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Growth Play
XOM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth -14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
- Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 113.9%)
Best for: growth exposure
CVX
Chevron Corporation
The Income Angle
CVX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: energy exposure
BP
BP p.l.c.
The Income Pick
BP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta -0.01, yield 4.4%
- Beta -0.01, yield 4.4%, current ratio 1.26x
- 0.1% revenue growth vs INSW's -11.4%
- 4.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BP | 0.1% revenue growth vs INSW's -11.4% |
| Value | INSW | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 15.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | INSW | 80.8% margin vs BP's 1.6% |
| Stability / Safety | XOM | Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 113.9%) |
| Dividends | BP | 4.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | INSW | +160.2% vs CVX's +39.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | INSW | 20.1% ROA vs BP's 1.1%, ROIC 9.4% vs 9.8% |
INSW vs XOM vs CVX vs BP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
INSW vs XOM vs CVX vs BP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLINSWLAGGINGCVX
Who Leads Where
INSW leads in 3 of 6 categories
BP leads 1 • XOM leads 0 • CVX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓CVXChevron Corporation
0leads
XOMExxon Mobil Corporati…
0leads
BPBP p.l.c.
1leads
INSWInternational Seaways…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BPvs XOMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
INSW5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
BP4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
INSW5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
INSW6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 479.2x INSW's $676M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BP's 1.6%. On growth, BP holds the edge at +11.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | INSWInternational Sea… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… | CVXChevron Corporati… | BPBP p.l.c. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $676M | $323.9B | $184.4B | $194.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $465M | $59.9B | $37.1B | $38.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $546M | $28.8B | $12.3B | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $193M | $23.6B | $16.2B | $11.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.6% | +21.7% | +30.4% | +19.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +44.4% | +10.5% | +9.0% | +10.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +80.8% | +8.9% | +6.7% | +1.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +7.3% | +8.8% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -91.3% | -1.3% | -5.3% | +11.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.8% | -11.0% | -24.5% | +4.5% |
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
BP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, INSW trades at a 99% valuation discount to BP's 2147.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BP's 4.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 10.9x.
| Metric | INSWInternational Sea… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… | CVXChevron Corporati… | BPBP p.l.c. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $620.8B | $364.2B | $114.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.9B | $653.7B | $404.5B | $162.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.48x | 21.86x | 27.53x | 2147.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.52x | 14.79x | 15.02x | 8.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.48x | 10.91x | 10.89x | 4.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.29x | 1.92x | 1.97x | 0.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.21x | 2.37x | 1.76x | 1.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 117.08x | 26.29x | 21.95x | 10.12x |
BP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $4 for BP. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BP's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BP scores 7/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | INSWInternational Sea… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… | CVXChevron Corporati… | BPBP p.l.c. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.1% | +10.7% | +7.2% | +4.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.1% | +6.4% | +4.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | +8.6% | +6.2% | +9.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.1% | +8.9% | +6.6% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.16x | 0.24x | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $459M | $32.9B | $40.3B | $47.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $117M | $10.7B | $6.5B | $36.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $576M | $43.5B | $46.7B | $84.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.90x | 69.44x | 17.22x | 3.55x |
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSW five years ago would be worth $53,809 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,368 for BP. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +160.2% total return vs CVX's +39.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 40.9% vs CVX's 8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | INSWInternational Sea… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… | CVXChevron Corporati… | BPBP p.l.c. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +96.5% | +20.3% | +18.2% | +23.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +160.2% | +43.9% | +39.5% | +62.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.7% | +44.9% | +26.7% | +33.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +438.1% | +164.6% | +94.0% | +93.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1014.5% | +105.0% | +135.8% | +101.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.9% | +13.2% | +8.2% | +10.0% |
INSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INSW and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSW's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INSW currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | INSWInternational Sea… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… | CVXChevron Corporati… | BPBP p.l.c. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.43x | -0.15x | -0.05x | -0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $91.58 | $176.41 | $214.71 | $48.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.60 | $101.19 | $133.77 | $27.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.5% | +83.0% | +85.0% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.3 | 42.4 | 42.1 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 597K | 18.9M | 11.0M | 15.1M |
Evenly matched — INSW and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — XOM and BP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INSW as "Buy", XOM as "Hold", CVX as "Buy", BP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.5% upside for XOM (target: $160) vs -7.6% for INSW (target: $83). For income investors, BP offers the higher dividend yield at 4.36% vs XOM's 2.73%.
| Metric | INSWInternational Sea… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… | CVXChevron Corporati… | BPBP p.l.c. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $83.33 | $160.43 | $190.93 | $43.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 55 | 53 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +2.7% | +3.8% | +4.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 26 | 8 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.92 | $4.00 | $6.87 | $1.91 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% | +3.3% | +3.9% |
Evenly matched — XOM and BP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
INSW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallInternational Seaways, Inc. (INSW)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
INSW vs XOM vs CVX vs BP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INSW or XOM or CVX or BP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BP p.
l. c. (BP) is the stronger pick with 0. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 4% for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INSW or XOM or CVX or BP?
On trailing P/E, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus BP p. l. c. at 2147. 5x. On forward P/E, International Seaways, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INSW or XOM or CVX or BP?
Over the past 5 years, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) delivered a total return of +438. 1%, compared to +93. 7% for BP p. l. c. (BP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1015% versus BP's +101. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INSW or XOM or CVX or BP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus International Seaways, Inc. 's 0. 43β — meaning INSW is approximately -394% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 114% for BP p. l. c. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INSW or XOM or CVX or BP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BP p.
l. c. (BP) is pulling ahead at 0. 1% versus -11. 4% for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exxon Mobil Corporation grew EPS -14. 5% year-over-year, compared to -85. 4% for BP p. l. c.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INSW leads at -0. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INSW or XOM or CVX or BP?
International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 0. 0% for BP p. l. c. — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 8. 2% for BP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSW leads at 42. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INSW or XOM or CVX or BP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for Chevron Corporation — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOM: 9. 5% to $160. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — INSW or XOM or CVX or BP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
BP p. l. c. (BP) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 2. 7% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM).
09Is INSW or XOM or CVX or BP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 2% yield, +1015% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1015%, BP: +101. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INSW and XOM and CVX and BP?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; CVX is a large-cap income-oriented stock; BP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(INSW: -91.3% · XOM: -1.3%)Net Margin>
%
(INSW: 80.8% · XOM: 8.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(INSW: 14.5x · XOM: 21.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.