Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
INTA vs APPF vs PCTY vs CSGP vs PAYC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Real Estate - Services
Software - Application
INTA vs APPF vs PCTY vs CSGP vs PAYC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Real Estate - Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.93B | $6.12B | $5.93B | $14.83B | $7.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $554M | $995M | $1.73B | $3.41B | $2.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-39M | $152M | $258M | $25M | $470M |
| Gross Margin | 75.0% | 63.2% | 69.3% | 77.4% | 81.0% |
| Operating Margin | -7.5% | 17.1% | 21.3% | -0.8% | 28.3% |
| Forward P/E | 19.7x | 25.0x | 14.0x | 25.8x | 13.2x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $71M | $218M | $1.14B | $152M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $313M | $107M | $398M | $1.73B | $370M |
INTA vs APPF vs PCTY vs CSGP vs PAYC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intapp, Inc. (INTA) | 100 | 85.6 | -14.4% |
| AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) | 100 | 120.5 | +20.5% |
| Paylocity Holding C… (PCTY) | 100 | 57.2 | -42.8% |
| CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) | 100 | 42.2 | -57.8% |
| Paycom Software, In… (PAYC) | 100 | 38.1 | -61.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INTA vs APPF vs PCTY vs CSGP vs PAYC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INTA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
APPF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth -30.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.3%
- 12.8% 10Y total return vs PAYC's 271.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 3.20x
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 3.20x
PCTY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- beta 0.43
- Beta 0.43 vs INTA's 0.95
Among these 5 stocks, CSGP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PAYC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.49 vs PCTY's 0.50
- Lower P/E (13.2x vs 25.8x)
- 22.4% margin vs INTA's -7.0%
- 1.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs PAYC's 8.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 25.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.4% margin vs INTA's -7.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs INTA's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -20.7% vs INTA's -55.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.2% ROA vs INTA's -4.8%, ROIC 22.4% vs -9.2% |
INTA vs APPF vs PCTY vs CSGP vs PAYC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INTA vs APPF vs PCTY vs CSGP vs PAYC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAYC leads in 3 of 6 categories
APPF leads 1 • PCTY leads 1 • INTA leads 0 • CSGP leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAYC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSGP is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 6.2x INTA's $554M. PAYC is the more profitable business, keeping 22.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INTA's -7.0%. On growth, CSGP holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $554M | $995M | $1.7B | $3.4B | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$30M | $192M | $394M | $278M | $780M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$39M | $152M | $258M | $25M | $470M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $123M | $234M | $470M | $241M | $444M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.0% | +63.2% | +69.3% | +77.4% | +81.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | +17.1% | +21.3% | -0.8% | +28.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +15.3% | +14.9% | +0.7% | +22.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +23.5% | +27.2% | +7.1% | +21.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.1% | +20.4% | +10.5% | +22.5% | +7.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.4% | +37.2% | +26.7% | +127.7% | +22.6% |
Valuation Metrics
PAYC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, PAYC trades at a 99% valuation discount to CSGP's 2107.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PAYC offers better value at 0.64x vs PCTY's 0.96x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $6.1B | $5.9B | $14.8B | $7.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $6.1B | $5.8B | $14.2B | $7.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -104.26x | 43.83x | 27.14x | 2107.23x | 17.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.66x | 24.99x | 14.05x | 25.84x | 13.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.96x | — | 0.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 34.66x | 14.25x | 83.74x | 9.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.82x | 6.44x | 3.72x | 4.57x | 3.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.63x | 11.39x | 5.00x | 1.77x | 4.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.82x | 25.62x | 17.31x | 361.59x | 18.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYC delivers a 31.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-9 for INTA. INTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PCTY's 0.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCTY scores 8/9 vs PAYC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.9% | +30.9% | +22.4% | +0.3% | +31.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.8% | +24.2% | +4.9% | +0.2% | +9.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.2% | +22.4% | +26.2% | -0.9% | +30.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.0% | +25.9% | +23.3% | -0.8% | +27.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.13x | 0.18x | 0.14x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$297M | -$36M | -$180M | -$589M | -$218M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $313M | $107M | $398M | $1.7B | $370M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $71M | $218M | $1.1B | $152M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -23.77x | — | 23.29x | 1.58x | 95.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APPF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APPF five years ago would be worth $13,059 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,112 for CSGP. Over the past 12 months, APPF leads with a -20.7% total return vs INTA's -55.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APPF at 7.3% vs CSGP's -22.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.3% | -26.2% | -25.1% | -46.7% | -8.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.1% | -20.7% | -40.6% | -53.6% | -38.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.8% | +23.4% | -37.1% | -52.9% | -47.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.4% | +30.6% | -35.2% | -58.9% | -56.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.4% | +1277.1% | +218.2% | +77.5% | +271.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.2% | +7.3% | -14.3% | -22.2% | -19.5% |
Risk & Volatility
PCTY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INTA's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PCTY currently trades 54.0% from its 52-week high vs CSGP's 35.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.71x | 0.43x | 0.80x | 0.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $58.84 | $326.04 | $201.97 | $97.43 | $267.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.24 | $142.72 | $92.99 | $33.31 | $104.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.8% | +52.2% | +54.0% | +35.9% | +51.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 53.2 | 45.7 | 30.4 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 930K | 349K | 733K | 5.9M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INTA as "Buy", APPF as "Buy", PCTY as "Buy", CSGP as "Buy", PAYC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 77.0% upside for CSGP (target: $62) vs 7.9% for PAYC (target: $149). PAYC is the only dividend payer here at 1.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.80 | $236.67 | $168.08 | $61.91 | $149.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 13 | 41 | 25 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% | +2.5% | +3.9% | +4.3% |
PAYC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). APPF leads in 1 (Total Returns).
INTA vs APPF vs PCTY vs CSGP vs PAYC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INTA or APPF or PCTY or CSGP or PAYC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 9% for Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC). Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intapp, Inc. (INTA) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INTA or APPF or PCTY or CSGP or PAYC?
On trailing P/E, Paycom Software, Inc.
(PAYC) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus CoStar Group, Inc. at 2107. 2x. On forward P/E, Paycom Software, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Paycom Software, Inc. wins at 0. 49x versus Paylocity Holding Corporation's 0. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INTA or APPF or PCTY or CSGP or PAYC?
Over the past 5 years, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) delivered a total return of +30. 6%, compared to -58. 9% for CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APPF returned +1277% versus INTA's -14. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INTA or APPF or PCTY or CSGP or PAYC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
43β versus Intapp, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning INTA is approximately 121% more volatile than PCTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intapp, Inc. (INTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 18% for Paylocity Holding Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INTA or APPF or PCTY or CSGP or PAYC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus 8. 9% for Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intapp, Inc. grew EPS 48. 9% year-over-year, compared to -95. 1% for CoStar Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APPF leads at 26. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INTA or APPF or PCTY or CSGP or PAYC?
Paycom Software, Inc.
(PAYC) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus -3. 6% for Intapp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAYC leads at 27. 6% versus -5. 4% for INTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAYC leads at 78. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INTA or APPF or PCTY or CSGP or PAYC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 49x versus Paylocity Holding Corporation's 0. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 8x for CoStar Group, Inc. — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CSGP: 77. 0% to $61. 91.
08Which pays a better dividend — INTA or APPF or PCTY or CSGP or PAYC?
In this comparison, PAYC (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. INTA, APPF, PCTY, CSGP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is INTA or APPF or PCTY or CSGP or PAYC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +1277% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (APPF: +1277%, INTA: -14. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INTA and APPF and PCTY and CSGP and PAYC?
These companies operate in different sectors (INTA (Technology) and APPF (Technology) and PCTY (Technology) and CSGP (Real Estate) and PAYC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: INTA is a small-cap high-growth stock; APPF is a small-cap high-growth stock; PCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CSGP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PAYC is a small-cap deep-value stock. PAYC pays a dividend while INTA, APPF, PCTY, CSGP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.