Financial - Mortgages
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IOR vs ARL vs UMH vs NXRT vs IRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Development
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
IOR vs ARL vs UMH vs NXRT vs IRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Mortgages | Real Estate - Development | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $73M | $223M | $1.35B | $756M | $3.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $50M | $201M | $252M | $662M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $13M | $22M | $-32M | $48M |
| Gross Margin | — | -36.9% | 37.2% | 91.1% | 20.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -11.2% | 18.0% | 11.5% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 18.3x | 0.7x | 149.8x | — | 99.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $214M | $761M | $1.56B | $2.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6K | $14M | $72M | $14M | $48M |
IOR vs ARL vs UMH vs NXRT vs IRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income Opportunity … (IOR) | 100 | 171.4 | +71.4% |
| American Realty Inv… (ARL) | 100 | 183.8 | +83.8% |
| UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) | 100 | 127.2 | +27.2% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 93.2 | -6.8% |
| Independence Realty… (IRT) | 100 | 165.5 | +65.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IOR vs ARL vs UMH vs NXRT vs IRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IOR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and efficiency is your priority.
- Beta 0.21 vs ARL's 1.00
- 3.2% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC -0.2% vs 1.1%
ARL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 197.4% 10Y total return vs NXRT's 211.1%
- Lower P/E (0.7x vs 99.9x)
- 25.2% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
- +9.1% vs NXRT's -15.2%
UMH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 8.8%, EPS growth 112.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 83.9%, current ratio 12.28x
- Beta 0.36, yield 5.2%, current ratio 12.28x
- 8.8% FFO/revenue growth vs IOR's -100.0%
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.1%
- 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs UMH's 5.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, IRT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.8% FFO/revenue growth vs IOR's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 99.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.2% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs ARL's 1.00 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs UMH's 5.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.1% vs NXRT's -15.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC -0.2% vs 1.1% |
IOR vs ARL vs UMH vs NXRT vs IRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
IOR vs ARL vs UMH vs NXRT vs IRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NXRT leads in 2 of 6 categories
IOR leads 2 • ARL leads 0 • UMH leads 0 • IRT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ARL and UMH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRT and IOR operate at a comparable scale, with $662M and $0 in trailing revenue. ARL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, ARL holds the edge at +2.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $50M | $201M | $252M | $662M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $5M | $86M | $125M | $365M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $13M | $22M | -$32M | $48M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$338,000 | $3M | $87M | $79M | $139M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -36.9% | +37.2% | +91.1% | +20.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -11.2% | +18.0% | +11.5% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +25.2% | +10.8% | -12.7% | +7.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +5.4% | +43.2% | +31.2% | +21.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.8% | -100.0% | +0.5% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.2% | -116.7% | — | 0.0% | -101.4% |
Valuation Metrics
NXRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, ARL trades at a 94% valuation discount to UMH's 226.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IOR's 14.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARL's 68.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $73M | $223M | $1.4B | $756M | $3.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $73M | $423M | $2.0B | $2.3B | $6.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.33x | 14.23x | 226.86x | -23.65x | 68.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 0.66x | 149.81x | — | 99.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.23x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.46x | 68.82x | 18.22x | 18.60x | 16.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.46x | 5.17x | 3.01x | 5.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.58x | 0.27x | 1.50x | 2.52x | 1.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 16.51x | 9.05x | 26.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IOR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IOR delivers a 3.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NXRT. ARL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UMH scores 6/9 vs IOR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.2% | +1.6% | +2.4% | -10.1% | +1.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +1.2% | +1.7% | -1.7% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | -0.5% | +2.3% | +1.1% | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.3% | -0.6% | +2.8% | +1.5% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.26x | 0.84x | 5.18x | 0.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6,000 | $200M | $689M | $1.5B | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6,000 | $14M | $72M | $14M | $48M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $214M | $761M | $1.6B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.11x | 1.89x | 0.47x | 1.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — IOR and ARL and NXRT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARL five years ago would be worth $17,692 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,705 for NXRT. Over the past 12 months, ARL leads with a +9.1% total return vs NXRT's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IOR at 18.5% vs ARL's -10.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | -15.0% | +1.3% | +2.6% | -6.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.9% | +9.1% | -3.0% | -15.2% | -11.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.3% | -27.7% | +19.0% | -15.5% | +7.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.7% | +76.9% | -9.5% | -23.0% | +17.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.5% | +197.4% | +139.1% | +211.1% | +191.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.5% | -10.2% | +6.0% | -5.5% | +2.4% |
Risk & Volatility
IOR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IOR is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARL's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IOR currently trades 91.2% from its 52-week high vs ARL's 69.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 1.00x | 0.36x | 0.62x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.69 | $20.00 | $17.49 | $38.30 | $19.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.50 | $11.95 | $13.93 | $23.79 | $14.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.2% | +69.0% | +90.8% | +77.8% | +83.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.4 | 40.3 | 58.9 | 71.0 | 62.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 692 | 3K | 621K | 216K | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
NXRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UMH as "Buy", NXRT as "Hold", IRT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.7% upside for IRT (target: $20) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, NXRT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.07% vs IRT's 4.02%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $16.50 | $27.00 | $20.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 15 | 10 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +5.2% | +7.1% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.83 | $2.11 | $0.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | +0.4% | +1.0% | +0.8% |
NXRT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). IOR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
IOR vs ARL vs UMH vs NXRT vs IRT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IOR or ARL or UMH or NXRT or IRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UMH Properties, Inc.
(UMH) is the stronger pick with 8. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. (IOR). American Realty Investors, Inc. (ARL) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (0. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IOR or ARL or UMH or NXRT or IRT?
On trailing P/E, American Realty Investors, Inc.
(ARL) is the cheapest at 14. 2x versus UMH Properties, Inc. at 226. 9x. On forward P/E, American Realty Investors, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IOR or ARL or UMH or NXRT or IRT?
Over the past 5 years, American Realty Investors, Inc.
(ARL) delivered a total return of +76. 9%, compared to -23. 0% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXRT returned +211. 1% versus UMH's +139. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IOR or ARL or UMH or NXRT or IRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.
(IOR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus American Realty Investors, Inc. 's 1. 00β — meaning ARL is approximately 368% more volatile than IOR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Realty Investors, Inc. (ARL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IOR or ARL or UMH or NXRT or IRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UMH Properties, Inc.
(UMH) is pulling ahead at 8. 8% versus -100. 0% for Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. (IOR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Realty Investors, Inc. grew EPS 206. 6% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UMH leads at 10. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IOR or ARL or UMH or NXRT or IRT?
American Realty Investors, Inc.
(ARL) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IRT leads at 18. 4% versus -12. 9% for ARL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IOR or ARL or UMH or NXRT or IRT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, American Realty Investors, Inc.
(ARL) trades at 0. 7x forward P/E versus 149. 8x for UMH Properties, Inc. — 149. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IRT: 22. 7% to $20. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — IOR or ARL or UMH or NXRT or IRT?
In this comparison, NXRT (7.
1% yield), UMH (5. 2% yield), IRT (4. 0% yield) pay a dividend. IOR, ARL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IOR or ARL or UMH or NXRT or IRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, UMH Properties, Inc.
(UMH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 36), 5. 2% yield, +139. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UMH: +139. 1%, ARL: +197. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IOR and ARL and UMH and NXRT and IRT?
These companies operate in different sectors (IOR (Financial Services) and ARL (Real Estate) and UMH (Real Estate) and NXRT (Real Estate) and IRT (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IOR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARL is a small-cap deep-value stock; UMH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. UMH, NXRT, IRT pay a dividend while IOR, ARL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.