Financial - Mortgages
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IOR vs UMH vs NXRT vs NNN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Retail
IOR vs UMH vs NXRT vs NNN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Mortgages | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $73M | $1.35B | $756M | $8.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $201M | $252M | $936M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $22M | $-32M | $387M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.2% | 91.1% | 81.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 18.0% | 11.5% | 63.3% |
| Forward P/E | 18.3x | 149.8x | — | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $761M | $1.56B | $4.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6K | $72M | $14M | $5M |
IOR vs UMH vs NXRT vs NNN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income Opportunity … (IOR) | 100 | 171.4 | +71.4% |
| UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) | 100 | 127.2 | +27.2% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 93.2 | -6.8% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 141.8 | +41.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IOR vs UMH vs NXRT vs NNN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IOR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 155.5% 10Y total return vs NXRT's 211.1%
- Lower P/E (18.3x vs 21.7x)
UMH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 8.8%, EPS growth 112.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 83.9%, current ratio 12.28x
- 8.8% FFO/revenue growth vs IOR's -100.0%
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs UMH's 5.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
NNN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 5.3%
- Beta 0.15, yield 5.3%, current ratio 0.19x
- 41.4% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
- Beta 0.15 vs NXRT's 0.62, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.8% FFO/revenue growth vs IOR's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.3x vs 21.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.4% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs NXRT's 0.62, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs UMH's 5.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.4% vs NXRT's -15.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC 4.8% vs 1.1% |
IOR vs UMH vs NXRT vs NNN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
IOR vs UMH vs NXRT vs NNN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NNN leads in 3 of 6 categories
NXRT leads 2 • IOR leads 1 • UMH leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NNN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NNN and IOR operate at a comparable scale, with $936M and $0 in trailing revenue. NNN is the more profitable business, keeping 41.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, NNN holds the edge at +4.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $201M | $252M | $936M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $86M | $125M | $867M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $22M | -$32M | $387M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$338,000 | $87M | $79M | $464M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +37.2% | +91.1% | +81.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +18.0% | +11.5% | +63.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +10.8% | -12.7% | +41.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +43.2% | +31.2% | +49.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% | +0.5% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.2% | — | 0.0% | -2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NXRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.3x trailing earnings, IOR trades at a 92% valuation discount to UMH's 226.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IOR's 14.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NXRT's 18.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $73M | $1.4B | $756M | $8.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $73M | $2.0B | $2.3B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.33x | 226.86x | -23.65x | 21.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 149.81x | — | 21.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.46x | 18.22x | 18.60x | 15.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.17x | 3.01x | 9.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.58x | 1.50x | 2.52x | 1.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.51x | 9.05x | 12.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NXRT. UMH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.84x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UMH scores 6/9 vs IOR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.2% | +2.4% | -10.1% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +1.7% | -1.7% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | +2.3% | +1.1% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.3% | +2.8% | +1.5% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.84x | 5.18x | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6,000 | $689M | $1.5B | $4.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6,000 | $72M | $14M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $761M | $1.6B | $4.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.89x | 0.47x | 2.93x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IOR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IOR five years ago would be worth $14,566 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,705 for NXRT. Over the past 12 months, NNN leads with a +12.4% total return vs NXRT's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IOR at 18.5% vs NXRT's -5.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | +1.3% | +2.6% | +15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.9% | -3.0% | -15.2% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.3% | +19.0% | -15.5% | +15.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.7% | -9.5% | -23.0% | +15.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.5% | +139.1% | +211.1% | +37.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.5% | +6.0% | -5.5% | +4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
NNN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NNN is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NXRT's 0.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNN currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs NXRT's 77.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 0.36x | 0.62x | 0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.69 | $17.49 | $38.30 | $46.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.50 | $13.93 | $23.79 | $38.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.2% | +90.8% | +77.8% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.4 | 58.9 | 71.0 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 692 | 621K | 216K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
NXRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UMH as "Buy", NXRT as "Hold", NNN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.9% upside for UMH (target: $17) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, NXRT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.07% vs UMH's 5.25%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $16.50 | $27.00 | $46.06 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 10 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.2% | +7.1% | +5.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 | 12 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.83 | $2.11 | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
NNN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NXRT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
IOR vs UMH vs NXRT vs NNN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IOR or UMH or NXRT or NNN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UMH Properties, Inc.
(UMH) is the stronger pick with 8. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. (IOR). Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. (IOR) offers the better valuation at 18. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IOR or UMH or NXRT or NNN?
On trailing P/E, Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.
(IOR) is the cheapest at 18. 3x versus UMH Properties, Inc. at 226. 9x. On forward P/E, NNN REIT, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IOR or UMH or NXRT or NNN?
Over the past 5 years, Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.
(IOR) delivered a total return of +45. 7%, compared to -23. 0% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXRT returned +211. 1% versus NNN's +37. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IOR or UMH or NXRT or NNN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. 's 0. 62β — meaning NXRT is approximately 307% more volatile than NNN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 84% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IOR or UMH or NXRT or NNN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UMH Properties, Inc.
(UMH) is pulling ahead at 8. 8% versus -100. 0% for Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. (IOR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UMH Properties, Inc. grew EPS 112. 1% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UMH leads at 10. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IOR or UMH or NXRT or NNN?
NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NNN leads at 61. 5% versus 0. 0% for IOR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IOR or UMH or NXRT or NNN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) trades at 21. 7x forward P/E versus 149. 8x for UMH Properties, Inc. — 128. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UMH: 3. 9% to $16. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — IOR or UMH or NXRT or NNN?
In this comparison, NXRT (7.
1% yield), NNN (5. 3% yield), UMH (5. 2% yield) pay a dividend. IOR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IOR or UMH or NXRT or NNN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 5. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NNN: +37. 8%, IOR: +155. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IOR and UMH and NXRT and NNN?
These companies operate in different sectors (IOR (Financial Services) and UMH (Real Estate) and NXRT (Real Estate) and NNN (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IOR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UMH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. UMH, NXRT, NNN pay a dividend while IOR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.