Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IOTR vs SOND vs ABNB vs APLE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Lodging
Travel Services
REIT - Hotel & Motel
IOTR vs SOND vs ABNB vs APLE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Travel Lodging | Travel Services | REIT - Hotel & Motel |
| Market Cap | $6M | $3K | $84.82B | $3.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $589M | $12.65B | $1.42B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-231K | $-249M | $2.52B | $172M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | 37.9% | 82.9% | 30.5% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | -22.5% | 20.5% | 17.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 28.5x | 20.9x |
| Total Debt | $724K | $1.40B | $2.07B | $1.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $443K | $21M | $6.56B | $39M |
IOTR vs SOND vs ABNB vs APLE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| iOThree Limited Ord… (IOTR) | 100 | 59.3 | -40.7% |
| Sonder Holdings Inc. (SOND) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) | 100 | 116.1 | +16.1% |
| Apple Hospitality R… (APLE) | 100 | 120.1 | +20.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IOTR vs SOND vs ABNB vs APLE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IOTR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.48
- Rev growth 22.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.2%
- 22.3% revenue growth vs APLE's -1.3%
SOND lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ABNB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, Low D/E 25.2%, current ratio 1.38x
- Beta 1.31, current ratio 1.38x
- 19.9% margin vs SOND's -42.3%
- 10.2% ROA vs SOND's -24.8%, ROIC 50.6% vs -12.3%
APLE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 18.8% 10Y total return vs ABNB's -2.2%
- Lower P/E (20.9x vs 28.5x)
- Beta 0.88 vs IOTR's 1.48
- 6.8% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.3% revenue growth vs APLE's -1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.9x vs 28.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.9% margin vs SOND's -42.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.88 vs IOTR's 1.48 | |
| Dividends | 6.8% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.0% vs SOND's -100.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.2% ROA vs SOND's -24.8%, ROIC 50.6% vs -12.3% |
IOTR vs SOND vs ABNB vs APLE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
IOTR vs SOND vs ABNB vs APLE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABNB leads in 2 of 6 categories
APLE leads 2 • IOTR leads 1 • SOND leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABNB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABNB is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 1206.9x IOTR's $10M. ABNB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOND's -42.3%. On growth, ABNB holds the edge at +17.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $589M | $12.6B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $25M | $2.6B | $444M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$249M | $2.5B | $172M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$84M | $4.5B | $320M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | +37.9% | +82.9% | +30.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.9% | -22.5% | +20.5% | +17.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | -42.3% | +19.9% | +12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | -14.2% | +36.0% | +22.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -10.6% | +17.9% | +3.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.3% | +4.0% | -7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
APLE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.1x trailing earnings, APLE trades at a 46% valuation discount to ABNB's 35.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, APLE's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SOND's 252.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $2,662 | $84.8B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $1.4B | $80.3B | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 0.00x | 35.11x | 19.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 28.48x | 20.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.85x | 252.91x | 31.58x | 11.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.56x | 0.00x | 6.93x | 2.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.39x | — | 10.75x | 1.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 18.26x | 11.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABNB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABNB delivers a 31.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-12 for IOTR. ABNB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APLE's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABNB scores 6/9 vs SOND's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.4% | — | +31.2% | +5.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.0% | -24.8% | +10.2% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.9% | -12.3% | +50.6% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.3% | -20.1% | +26.3% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | — | 0.25x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $280,935 | $1.4B | -$4.5B | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $443,117 | $21M | $6.6B | $39M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $724,052 | $1.4B | $2.1B | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.84x | -7.37x | — | 2.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APLE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APLE five years ago would be worth $11,793 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for SOND. Over the past 12 months, APLE leads with a +30.0% total return vs SOND's -100.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABNB at 4.0% vs SOND's -97.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.0% | -98.2% | +6.4% | +19.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -48.7% | -100.0% | +11.9% | +30.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | -100.0% | +12.6% | +11.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | -100.0% | -3.6% | +17.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | -100.0% | -2.2% | +18.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -59.8% | -97.2% | +4.0% | +3.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SOND and APLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SOND is the less volatile stock with a -0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IOTR's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APLE currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs SOND's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | -0.46x | 1.31x | 0.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.47 | $3.44 | $147.25 | $14.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.51 | $0.00 | $110.81 | $10.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.9% | +0.0% | +96.1% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.0 | 25.1 | 57.3 | 70.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 194K | 10K | 3.5M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
IOTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ABNB as "Buy", APLE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.5% upside for ABNB (target: $152) vs -0.9% for APLE (target: $14). APLE is the only dividend payer here at 6.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $152.17 | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 45 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +6.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.5% | +1.9% |
ABNB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). APLE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
IOTR vs SOND vs ABNB vs APLE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IOTR or SOND or ABNB or APLE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, iOThree Limited Ordinary Shares (IOTR) is the stronger pick with 22.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE). Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) offers the better valuation at 19. 1x trailing P/E (20. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IOTR or SOND or ABNB or APLE?
On trailing P/E, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
(APLE) is the cheapest at 19. 1x versus Airbnb, Inc. at 35. 1x. On forward P/E, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IOTR or SOND or ABNB or APLE?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
(APLE) delivered a total return of +17. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Sonder Holdings Inc. (SOND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APLE returned +18. 8% versus SOND's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IOTR or SOND or ABNB or APLE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sonder Holdings Inc.
(SOND) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 46β versus iOThree Limited Ordinary Shares's 1. 48β — meaning IOTR is approximately -423% more volatile than SOND relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 56% for Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IOTR or SOND or ABNB or APLE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), iOThree Limited Ordinary Shares (IOTR) is pulling ahead at 22.
3% versus -1. 3% for Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sonder Holdings Inc. grew EPS 28. 1% year-over-year, compared to -16. 9% for Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IOTR leads at 39. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IOTR or SOND or ABNB or APLE?
Airbnb, Inc.
(ABNB) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus -36. 1% for Sonder Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABNB leads at 20. 8% versus -29. 4% for SOND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ABNB leads at 83. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IOTR or SOND or ABNB or APLE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
(APLE) trades at 20. 9x forward P/E versus 28. 5x for Airbnb, Inc. — 7. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABNB: 7. 5% to $152. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — IOTR or SOND or ABNB or APLE?
In this comparison, APLE (6.
8% yield) pays a dividend. IOTR, SOND, ABNB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IOTR or SOND or ABNB or APLE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sonder Holdings Inc.
(SOND) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 46)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOND: -100. 0%, IOTR: -93. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IOTR and SOND and ABNB and APLE?
These companies operate in different sectors (IOTR (Technology) and SOND (Consumer Cyclical) and ABNB (Consumer Cyclical) and APLE (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IOTR is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABNB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; APLE is a small-cap income-oriented stock. APLE pays a dividend while IOTR, SOND, ABNB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.