Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IQST vs NFLX vs CSCO vs DIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Communication Equipment
Entertainment
IQST vs NFLX vs CSCO vs DIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Entertainment | Communication Equipment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $7M | $374.00B | $364.95B | $192.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $332M | $45.18B | $59.05B | $97.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $10.98B | $11.08B | $11.22B |
| Gross Margin | 2.7% | 48.5% | 64.4% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 29.5% | 23.0% | 15.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.8x | 22.2x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $14.46B | $29.64B | $44.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $9.03B | $9.47B | $5.70B |
IQST vs NFLX vs CSCO vs DIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| iQSTEL Inc. (IQST) | 100 | 24.5 | -75.5% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) | 100 | 192.7 | +92.7% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 92.7 | -7.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IQST vs NFLX vs CSCO vs DIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IQST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 96.0%, EPS growth -69.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 63.6%
- 96.0% revenue growth vs DIS's 3.4%
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs CSCO's 301.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- 24.3% margin vs IQST's -2.5%
- Beta 0.39 vs IQST's 1.34, lower leverage
CSCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.7%
- Beta 0.92, yield 1.7%, current ratio 1.00x
- 1.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs DIS's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +57.5% vs IQST's -80.8%
DIS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 22.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 96.0% revenue growth vs DIS's 3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 22.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs IQST's -2.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs IQST's 1.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs DIS's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.5% vs IQST's -80.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs IQST's -15.1%, ROIC 29.8% vs -5.0% |
IQST vs NFLX vs CSCO vs DIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IQST vs NFLX vs CSCO vs DIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories
DIS leads 1 • CSCO leads 1 • IQST leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.3B annually — 293.4x IQST's $332M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IQST's -2.5%. On growth, IQST holds the edge at +89.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $332M | $45.2B | $59.1B | $97.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $30.1B | $16.1B | $20.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $11.0B | $11.1B | $11.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $9.5B | $12.8B | $7.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +48.5% | +64.4% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +29.5% | +23.0% | +15.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +24.3% | +18.8% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +20.9% | +21.8% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.6% | +17.6% | +9.7% | +6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +31.1% | +29.5% | -29.8% |
Valuation Metrics
DIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.9x trailing earnings, DIS trades at a 56% valuation discount to CSCO's 36.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DIS's 12.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSCO's 26.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $374.0B | $365.0B | $192.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12M | $379.4B | $385.1B | $231.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -41.64x | 34.89x | 36.14x | 15.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.80x | 22.18x | 16.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.61x | 26.34x | 12.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 8.28x | 6.44x | 2.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 20.98x | 14.32x | 7.87x | 1.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.53x | 27.46x | 19.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-60 for IQST. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQST's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSCO scores 8/9 vs IQST's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -59.6% | +41.3% | +23.2% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.1% | +19.8% | +9.0% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.0% | +29.8% | +13.0% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.1% | +30.5% | +13.7% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 0.54x | 0.63x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $5.4B | $20.2B | $39.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $9.0B | $9.5B | $5.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $14.5B | $29.6B | $44.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.39x | 17.33x | 9.64x | 9.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NFLX and CSCO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSCO five years ago would be worth $18,718 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $294 for IQST. Over the past 12 months, CSCO leads with a +57.5% total return vs IQST's -80.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs IQST's -46.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.1% | -3.0% | +22.3% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -80.8% | -23.6% | +57.5% | +7.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.4% | +166.5% | +109.3% | +8.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.1% | +75.2% | +87.2% | -39.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | +875.3% | +301.7% | +11.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.2% | +38.6% | +27.9% | +2.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NFLX and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IQST's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSCO currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs IQST's 7.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 0.39x | 0.92x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.00 | $134.12 | $94.72 | $124.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.28 | $75.01 | $59.07 | $92.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.2% | +65.8% | +97.3% | +87.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.9 | 35.3 | 63.9 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 358K | 44.0M | 18.9M | 9.1M |
Analyst Outlook
CSCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IQST as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", CSCO as "Buy", DIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 4.7% for CSCO (target: $97). For income investors, CSCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.75% vs DIS's 0.92%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $116.29 | $96.50 | $139.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 99 | 73 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.7% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 15 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.61 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +2.0% | +1.8% |
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
IQST vs NFLX vs CSCO vs DIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IQST or NFLX or CSCO or DIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, iQSTEL Inc.
(IQST) is the stronger pick with 96. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 4% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). The Walt Disney Company (DIS) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate iQSTEL Inc. (IQST) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IQST or NFLX or CSCO or DIS?
On trailing P/E, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the cheapest at 15.
9x versus Cisco Systems, Inc. at 36. 1x. On forward P/E, The Walt Disney Company is actually cheaper at 16. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IQST or NFLX or CSCO or DIS?
Over the past 5 years, Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) delivered a total return of +87. 2%, compared to -97. 1% for iQSTEL Inc. (IQST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus IQST's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IQST or NFLX or CSCO or DIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus iQSTEL Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning IQST is approximately 244% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 68% for iQSTEL Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IQST or NFLX or CSCO or DIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), iQSTEL Inc.
(IQST) is pulling ahead at 96. 0% versus 3. 4% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to 0. 4% for Cisco Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IQST leads at 63. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IQST or NFLX or CSCO or DIS?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -2. 1% for iQSTEL Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -0. 3% for IQST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSCO leads at 64. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IQST or NFLX or CSCO or DIS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) trades at 16.
5x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — IQST or NFLX or CSCO or DIS?
In this comparison, CSCO (1.
7% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. IQST, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IQST or NFLX or CSCO or DIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, IQST: -99. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IQST and NFLX and CSCO and DIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (IQST (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and CSCO (Technology) and DIS (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IQST is a small-cap high-growth stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. CSCO, DIS pay a dividend while IQST, NFLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.