REIT - Residential
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IRT vs AIV vs AVB vs EQR vs ESS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
IRT vs AIV vs AVB vs EQR vs ESS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $3.86B | $604M | $25.85B | $24.68B | $17.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $662M | $193M | $3.04B | $3.12B | $1.91B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $48M | $554M | $1.05B | $954M | $576M |
| Gross Margin | 20.2% | 55.2% | 67.0% | 46.3% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 17.5% | 66.3% | 30.1% | 28.5% | 38.4% |
| Forward P/E | 99.9x | 1.1x | 37.7x | 50.6x | 46.7x |
| Total Debt | $2.28B | $0.00 | $9.33B | $8.78B | $6.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $48M | $395M | $187M | $56M | $86M |
IRT vs AIV vs AVB vs EQR vs ESS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independence Realty… (IRT) | 100 | 165.5 | +65.5% |
| Apartment Investmen… (AIV) | 100 | 87.8 | -12.2% |
| AvalonBay Communiti… (AVB) | 100 | 119.1 | +19.1% |
| Equity Residential (EQR) | 100 | 108.8 | +8.8% |
| Essex Property Trus… (ESS) | 100 | 110.1 | +10.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IRT vs AIV vs AVB vs EQR vs ESS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IRT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 191.8% 10Y total return vs AIV's 85.0%
AIV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (1.1x vs 50.6x)
- 287.7% margin vs IRT's 7.3%
- 68.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ESS's 3.8%
- -1.4% vs IRT's -11.9%
AVB is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 8.06 vs ESS's 12.60
EQR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 4.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 77.0%, current ratio 0.05x
- Beta 0.38 vs AIV's 0.69
ESS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth -9.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.8%
- Beta 0.43, yield 3.8%, current ratio 2.30x
- 7.1% FFO/revenue growth vs AIV's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.1% FFO/revenue growth vs AIV's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.1x vs 50.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 287.7% margin vs IRT's 7.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs AIV's 0.69 | |
| Dividends | 68.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ESS's 3.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.4% vs IRT's -11.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 29.6% ROA vs IRT's 0.8%, ROIC 4.2% vs 1.6% |
IRT vs AIV vs AVB vs EQR vs ESS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IRT vs AIV vs AVB vs EQR vs ESS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AIV leads in 2 of 6 categories
EQR leads 1 • IRT leads 0 • AVB leads 0 • ESS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AIV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EQR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 16.2x AIV's $193M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.9% (AIV) to 7.3% (IRT). On growth, AVB holds the edge at +3.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $662M | $193M | $3.0B | $3.1B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $365M | $186M | $1.8B | $1.9B | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $48M | $554M | $1.1B | $954M | $576M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $139M | -$230M | $1.5B | $1.3B | $962M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +55.2% | +67.0% | +46.3% | +69.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.5% | +66.3% | +30.1% | +28.5% | +38.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +2.9% | +34.6% | +30.6% | +30.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.1% | -119.5% | +49.7% | +42.7% | +50.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | -3.4% | +3.7% | +2.5% | +1.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -101.4% | +25.9% | -40.9% | -64.2% | -47.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IRT and AIV each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.1x trailing earnings, AIV trades at a 98% valuation discount to IRT's 68.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EQR offers better value at 4.44x vs ESS's 6.94x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.9B | $604M | $25.8B | $24.7B | $17.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.1B | $209M | $35.0B | $33.4B | $24.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 68.21x | 1.11x | 25.14x | 22.63x | 25.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 99.88x | — | 37.72x | 50.61x | 46.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 5.37x | 4.44x | 6.94x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.71x | 2.09x | 19.15x | 15.61x | 16.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.87x | — | 8.51x | 7.96x | 9.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | 1.17x | 2.23x | 2.24x | 3.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.33x | — | 18.28x | 19.13x | 16.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AIV leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AIV delivers a 162.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $163 in annual profit, vs $1 for IRT. IRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.64x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ESS's 1.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IRT scores 6/9 vs AIV's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.3% | +162.9% | +8.8% | +8.4% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +29.6% | +4.8% | +4.6% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.6% | +4.2% | +3.3% | +4.2% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +2.3% | +4.4% | +5.7% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | — | 0.79x | 0.77x | 1.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.2B | -$395M | $9.1B | $8.7B | $6.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $48M | $395M | $187M | $56M | $86M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.3B | $0 | $9.3B | $8.8B | $6.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.73x | 0.70x | 5.07x | 5.58x | 3.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AIV and ESS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AIV five years ago would be worth $12,353 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,667 for EQR. Over the past 12 months, AIV leads with a -1.4% total return vs IRT's -11.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ESS at 10.7% vs AIV's 1.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.0% | -2.4% | +3.9% | +8.4% | +6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.9% | -1.4% | -7.2% | -2.7% | -2.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.4% | +5.1% | +14.4% | +17.5% | +35.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.8% | +23.5% | +12.1% | +6.7% | +8.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +191.8% | +85.0% | +31.6% | +29.3% | +50.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.4% | +1.7% | +4.6% | +5.5% | +10.7% |
Risk & Volatility
EQR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EQR is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIV's 0.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EQR currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs AIV's 48.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 0.69x | 0.48x | 0.38x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.61 | $8.87 | $209.86 | $71.80 | $294.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.60 | $3.94 | $160.09 | $57.58 | $238.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.5% | +48.6% | +88.5% | +91.7% | +90.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.4 | 50.1 | 71.2 | 69.8 | 66.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 2.9M | 940K | 2.4M | 429K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AIV and ESS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IRT as "Buy", AIV as "Hold", AVB as "Hold", EQR as "Hold", ESS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 132.0% upside for AIV (target: $10) vs 3.2% for AVB (target: $192). For income investors, AIV offers the higher dividend yield at 68.35% vs AVB's 3.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.08 | $10.00 | $191.70 | $70.15 | $279.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 3 | 42 | 46 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | +68.4% | +3.8% | +4.1% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.66 | $2.95 | $6.99 | $2.69 | $10.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +0.0% | +1.9% | +1.1% | +0.0% |
AIV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EQR leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.
IRT vs AIV vs AVB vs EQR vs ESS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IRT or AIV or AVB or EQR or ESS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Essex Property Trust, Inc.
(ESS) is the stronger pick with 7. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV). Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) offers the better valuation at 1. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IRT or AIV or AVB or EQR or ESS?
On trailing P/E, Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) is the cheapest at 1.
1x versus Independence Realty Trust, Inc. at 68. 2x. On forward P/E, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. is actually cheaper at 37. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: AvalonBay Communities, Inc. wins at 8. 06x versus Essex Property Trust, Inc. 's 12. 60x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IRT or AIV or AVB or EQR or ESS?
Over the past 5 years, Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) delivered a total return of +23.
5%, compared to +6. 7% for Equity Residential (EQR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRT returned +191. 8% versus EQR's +29. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IRT or AIV or AVB or EQR or ESS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Equity Residential (EQR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus Apartment Investment and Management Company's 0. 69β — meaning AIV is approximately 82% more volatile than EQR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 64% versus 120% for Essex Property Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IRT or AIV or AVB or EQR or ESS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Essex Property Trust, Inc.
(ESS) is pulling ahead at 7. 1% versus -100. 0% for Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Apartment Investment and Management Company grew EPS 623. 0% year-over-year, compared to -9. 8% for Essex Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ESS leads at 5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IRT or AIV or AVB or EQR or ESS?
Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) is the more profitable company, earning 287.
7% net margin versus 8. 6% for Independence Realty Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 287. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AIV leads at 66. 3% versus 18. 4% for IRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ESS leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IRT or AIV or AVB or EQR or ESS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 8. 06x versus Essex Property Trust, Inc. 's 12. 60x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB) trades at 37. 7x forward P/E versus 99. 9x for Independence Realty Trust, Inc. — 62. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AIV: 132. 0% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IRT or AIV or AVB or EQR or ESS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) offers the highest yield at 68. 4%, versus 3. 8% for AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB).
09Is IRT or AIV or AVB or EQR or ESS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independence Realty Trust, Inc.
(IRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48), 4. 0% yield, +191. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IRT: +191. 8%, AIV: +85. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IRT and AIV and AVB and EQR and ESS?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AIV is a small-cap deep-value stock; AVB is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; EQR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ESS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.