Leisure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ISPO vs BKNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
ISPO vs BKNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $54M | $128.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $248M | $27.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $6.15B |
| Gross Margin | 33.2% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | -3.0% | 34.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $206M | $19.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $17.20B |
ISPO vs BKNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inspirato Incorpora… (ISPO) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
| Booking Holdings In… (BKNG) | 100 | 214.8 | +114.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ISPO vs BKNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ISPO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.03
- Lower volatility, beta 0.03, current ratio 0.28x
- Beta 0.03, current ratio 0.28x
BKNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.4%, EPS growth -4.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.3%
- 240.1% 10Y total return vs ISPO's -97.9%
- 13.4% revenue growth vs ISPO's -15.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.4% revenue growth vs ISPO's -15.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.2% margin vs ISPO's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs BKNG's 0.73 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.4% vs BKNG's -18.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.1% ROA vs ISPO's -4.6% |
ISPO vs BKNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ISPO vs BKNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.7B annually — 111.8x ISPO's $248M. BKNG is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ISPO's -4.2%. On growth, BKNG holds the edge at +16.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $248M | $27.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $42M | $10.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $6.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $9.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +100.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +34.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +22.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +32.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.6% | +16.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -162.1% | +2.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ISPO leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ISPO's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKNG's 13.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $54M | $128.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $225M | $130.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.68x | 25.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.59x | 13.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.19x | 4.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BKNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BKNG scores 6/9 vs ISPO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.6% | +21.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | +75.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $171M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $17.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $206M | $19.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.09x | 7.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BKNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BKNG five years ago would be worth $18,709 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $214 for ISPO. Over the past 12 months, ISPO leads with a +26.4% total return vs BKNG's -18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKNG at 17.1% vs ISPO's -33.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | -21.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.4% | -18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.1% | +60.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | +87.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | +240.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -33.9% | +17.1% |
Risk & Volatility
ISPO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ISPO is the less volatile stock with a 0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BKNG's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ISPO currently trades 86.9% from its 52-week high vs BKNG's 3.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.03x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.90 | $5129.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.19 | $150.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.9% | +3.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 81.0 | 46.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 8.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
BKNG is the only dividend payer here at 0.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $231.72 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 71 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.53 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.0% |
BKNG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ISPO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
ISPO vs BKNG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ISPO or BKNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 0% for Inspirato Incorporated (ISPO). Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) offers the better valuation at 25. 1x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) a "Buy" — based on 71 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ISPO or BKNG?
Over the past 5 years, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) delivered a total return of +87. 1%, compared to -97. 9% for Inspirato Incorporated (ISPO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKNG returned +240. 1% versus ISPO's -97. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ISPO or BKNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Inspirato Incorporated (ISPO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
03β versus Booking Holdings Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning BKNG is approximately 2001% more volatile than ISPO relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ISPO or BKNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus -15. 0% for Inspirato Incorporated (ISPO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Inspirato Incorporated grew EPS 94. 1% year-over-year, compared to -4. 2% for Booking Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BKNG leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ISPO or BKNG?
Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 1% net margin versus -1. 9% for Inspirato Incorporated — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKNG leads at 34. 5% versus -1. 4% for ISPO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKNG leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ISPO or BKNG?
In this comparison, BKNG (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. ISPO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ISPO or BKNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 0. 9% yield, +240. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKNG: +240. 1%, ISPO: -97. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ISPO and BKNG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
BKNG pays a dividend while ISPO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.