Leisure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ISPO vs KNTK vs HESM vs SOND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Travel Lodging
ISPO vs KNTK vs HESM vs SOND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Travel Lodging |
| Market Cap | $54M | $3.33B | $8.05B | $3K |
| Revenue (TTM) | $248M | $1.73B | $1.62B | $589M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $228M | $353M | $-249M |
| Gross Margin | 33.2% | 24.8% | 75.0% | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | -3.0% | 8.2% | 62.2% | -22.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 42.4x | 13.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $206M | $3.87B | $3.77B | $1.40B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $4M | $2M | $21M |
ISPO vs KNTK vs HESM vs SOND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inspirato Incorpora… (ISPO) | 100 | 2.2 | -97.8% |
| Kinetik Holdings In… (KNTK) | 100 | 155.9 | +55.9% |
| Hess Midstream LP (HESM) | 100 | 158.2 | +58.2% |
| Sonder Holdings Inc. (SOND) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ISPO vs KNTK vs HESM vs SOND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ISPO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.
- Beta 0.06 vs KNTK's 0.60
- +29.1% vs SOND's -100.0%
KNTK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 16.5%
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 157.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.3%
- 19.0% revenue growth vs ISPO's -15.0%
- 16.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs HESM's 7.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
HESM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 121.2% 10Y total return vs KNTK's -33.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, current ratio 0.85x
- Beta 0.27, yield 7.4%, current ratio 0.85x
- Better valuation composite
SOND lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs ISPO's -15.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.8% margin vs SOND's -42.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs KNTK's 0.60 | |
| Dividends | 16.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs HESM's 7.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.1% vs SOND's -100.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs SOND's -24.8%, ROIC 18.6% vs -12.3% |
ISPO vs KNTK vs HESM vs SOND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ISPO vs KNTK vs HESM vs SOND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HESM leads in 2 of 6 categories
KNTK leads 1 • ISPO leads 0 • SOND leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HESM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KNTK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 7.0x ISPO's $248M. HESM is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOND's -42.3%. On growth, HESM holds the edge at +2.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $248M | $1.7B | $1.6B | $589M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $42M | $534M | $1.2B | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $228M | $353M | -$249M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $441M | $585M | -$84M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +24.8% | +75.0% | +37.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +8.2% | +62.2% | -22.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +13.2% | +21.8% | -42.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +25.5% | +36.1% | -14.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.6% | -7.5% | +2.3% | -10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -162.1% | -2.4% | +5.9% | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ISPO and HESM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, HESM trades at a 27% valuation discount to KNTK's 18.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ISPO's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SOND's 252.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $54M | $3.3B | $8.0B | $2,662 |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $225M | $7.2B | $11.8B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.68x | 18.43x | 13.50x | 0.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 42.44x | 13.29x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.80x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.59x | 13.14x | 9.67x | 252.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.19x | 1.89x | 4.96x | 0.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.04x | 10.85x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 44.78x | 11.05x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HESM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HESM delivers a 74.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $75 in annual profit, vs $21 for KNTK. KNTK carries lower financial leverage with a 1.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HESM's 8.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HESM scores 6/9 vs SOND's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +21.1% | +74.9% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.6% | +4.2% | +8.1% | -24.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.7% | +1.9% | +18.6% | -12.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | +2.5% | +24.8% | -20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.32x | 8.61x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $171M | $3.9B | $3.8B | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $4M | $2M | $21M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $206M | $3.9B | $3.8B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.09x | 5.98x | 4.54x | -7.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KNTK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HESM five years ago would be worth $22,310 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for SOND. Over the past 12 months, ISPO leads with a +29.1% total return vs SOND's -100.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KNTK at 24.7% vs SOND's -97.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | +37.4% | +13.6% | -98.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.1% | +28.0% | +10.9% | -100.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.1% | +93.9% | +62.9% | -100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | +93.1% | +123.1% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | -33.5% | +121.2% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -33.9% | +24.7% | +17.7% | -97.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KNTK and SOND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SOND is the less volatile stock with a -0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KNTK's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KNTK currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs SOND's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 0.60x | 0.27x | -0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.90 | $51.11 | $44.14 | $3.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.19 | $31.33 | $31.63 | $0.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.9% | +94.8% | +87.5% | +0.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 81.0 | 51.3 | 49.1 | 25.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 1.2M | 1.6M | 10K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KNTK and HESM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KNTK as "Buy", HESM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -1.8% upside for KNTK (target: $48) vs -17.1% for HESM (target: $32). For income investors, KNTK offers the higher dividend yield at 16.47% vs HESM's 7.37%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $47.57 | $32.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 9 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +16.5% | +7.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 3 | 7 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $7.98 | $2.84 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.3% | +5.0% | 0.0% |
HESM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KNTK leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
ISPO vs KNTK vs HESM vs SOND: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ISPO or KNTK or HESM or SOND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kinetik Holdings Inc.
(KNTK) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 0% for Inspirato Incorporated (ISPO). Hess Midstream LP (HESM) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (13. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ISPO or KNTK or HESM or SOND?
On trailing P/E, Hess Midstream LP (HESM) is the cheapest at 13.
5x versus Kinetik Holdings Inc. at 18. 4x. On forward P/E, Hess Midstream LP is actually cheaper at 13. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ISPO or KNTK or HESM or SOND?
Over the past 5 years, Hess Midstream LP (HESM) delivered a total return of +123.
1%, compared to -100. 0% for Sonder Holdings Inc. (SOND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HESM returned +121. 2% versus SOND's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ISPO or KNTK or HESM or SOND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sonder Holdings Inc.
(SOND) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 42β versus Kinetik Holdings Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning KNTK is approximately -243% more volatile than SOND relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 132% versus 9% for Hess Midstream LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ISPO or KNTK or HESM or SOND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kinetik Holdings Inc.
(KNTK) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -15. 0% for Inspirato Incorporated (ISPO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kinetik Holdings Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to 14. 9% for Hess Midstream LP. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOND leads at 38. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ISPO or KNTK or HESM or SOND?
Hess Midstream LP (HESM) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
8% net margin versus -36. 1% for Sonder Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HESM leads at 62. 2% versus -29. 4% for SOND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HESM leads at 63. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ISPO or KNTK or HESM or SOND more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hess Midstream LP (HESM) trades at 13.
3x forward P/E versus 42. 4x for Kinetik Holdings Inc. — 29. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KNTK: -1. 8% to $47. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — ISPO or KNTK or HESM or SOND?
In this comparison, KNTK (16.
5% yield), HESM (7. 4% yield) pay a dividend. ISPO, SOND do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ISPO or KNTK or HESM or SOND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hess Midstream LP (HESM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27), 7. 4% yield, +121. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HESM: +121. 2%, ISPO: -97. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ISPO and KNTK and HESM and SOND?
These companies operate in different sectors (ISPO (Consumer Cyclical) and KNTK (Energy) and HESM (Energy) and SOND (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ISPO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KNTK is a small-cap high-growth stock; HESM is a small-cap deep-value stock; SOND is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KNTK, HESM pay a dividend while ISPO, SOND do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.