Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ITGR vs NVCR vs LIVN vs ANIK vs LAKE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
Apparel - Manufacturers
ITGR vs NVCR vs LIVN vs ANIK vs LAKE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $3.03B | $1.92B | $3.88B | $203M | $106M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.85B | $674M | $1.43B | $116M | $193M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $142M | $-173M | $107M | $-11M | $-38M |
| Gross Margin | 23.3% | 75.2% | 67.5% | 58.6% | 34.8% |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | -27.2% | 13.4% | -10.5% | -7.2% |
| Forward P/E | 13.5x | — | 16.8x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $1.40B | $290M | $473M | $24M | $32M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $103M | $636M | $57M | $17M |
ITGR vs NVCR vs LIVN vs ANIK vs LAKE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Integer Holdings Co… (ITGR) | 100 | 111.0 | +11.0% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
| LivaNova PLC (LIVN) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
| Anika Therapeutics,… (ANIK) | 100 | 45.2 | -54.8% |
| Lakeland Industries… (LAKE) | 100 | 74.8 | -25.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ITGR vs NVCR vs LIVN vs ANIK vs LAKE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ITGR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.72
- 165.1% 10Y total return vs LIVN's 46.2%
- Better valuation composite
- 7.7% margin vs NVCR's -25.7%
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LIVN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +63.0% vs LAKE's -33.3%
- 4.2% ROA vs LAKE's -17.0%, ROIC 11.5% vs -5.1%
ANIK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 16.9%, current ratio 4.72x
- Beta 1.14, current ratio 4.72x
LAKE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 34.1%, EPS growth -437.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.2%
- 34.1% revenue growth vs ANIK's -5.9%
- 1.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.1% revenue growth vs ANIK's -5.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.7% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.0% vs LAKE's -33.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs LAKE's -17.0%, ROIC 11.5% vs -5.1% |
ITGR vs NVCR vs LIVN vs ANIK vs LAKE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ITGR vs NVCR vs LIVN vs ANIK vs LAKE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LIVN leads in 3 of 6 categories
ITGR leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • ANIK leads 0 • LAKE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIVN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITGR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 15.9x ANIK's $116M. ITGR is the more profitable business, keeping 7.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, LIVN holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $674M | $1.4B | $116M | $193M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $328M | -$165M | $220M | -$7M | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $142M | -$173M | $107M | -$11M | -$38M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $168M | -$48M | $161M | $1M | -$16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +75.2% | +67.5% | +58.6% | +34.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | -27.2% | +13.4% | -10.5% | -7.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | -25.7% | +7.5% | -9.5% | -19.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | -7.1% | +11.2% | +0.9% | -8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.8% | +12.3% | +14.3% | +13.2% | +4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +172.7% | -100.0% | +106.7% | -8.8% | -165.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ITGR and LAKE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ITGR's 13.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LIVN's 15.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $1.9B | $3.9B | $203M | $106M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $2.1B | $3.7B | $170M | $120M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.42x | -13.80x | -15.94x | -19.92x | -4.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.55x | — | 16.84x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 6.91x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.15x | — | 15.40x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.64x | 2.92x | 2.79x | 1.80x | 0.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.79x | 5.51x | 3.22x | 1.51x | 0.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.78x | — | 22.40x | 46.51x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LIVN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIVN delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. ANIK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ANIK scores 6/9 vs LAKE's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.2% | -50.8% | +9.1% | -7.7% | -27.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | -16.5% | +4.2% | -5.9% | -17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | -16.4% | +11.5% | -7.1% | -5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.9% | -28.9% | +10.2% | -6.4% | -5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.80x | 0.85x | 0.39x | 0.17x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $187M | -$162M | -$33M | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $103M | $636M | $57M | $17M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $290M | $473M | $24M | $32M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.07x | -96.80x | 3.98x | — | -23.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LIVN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ITGR five years ago would be worth $9,252 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, LIVN leads with a +63.0% total return vs LAKE's -33.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LIVN at 14.6% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.5% | +28.3% | +17.0% | +61.9% | +22.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.1% | +1.1% | +63.0% | +4.5% | -33.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.8% | -75.7% | +50.5% | -41.7% | -4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.5% | -91.3% | -14.5% | -63.9% | -58.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +165.1% | +30.3% | +46.2% | -65.9% | +34.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.9% | -37.6% | +14.6% | -16.5% | -1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ITGR and LIVN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITGR is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIVN currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs LAKE's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 2.20x | 1.29x | 1.14x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $123.78 | $20.06 | $71.92 | $16.24 | $20.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $62.00 | $9.82 | $39.36 | $7.87 | $7.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.0% | +83.9% | +98.6% | +93.2% | +52.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 69.8 | 57.6 | 53.3 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 628K | 1.5M | 808K | 135K | 100K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ITGR as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", LIVN as "Buy", ANIK as "Buy", LAKE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 7.0% for LIVN (target: $76). LAKE is the only dividend payer here at 1.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $98.00 | $33.50 | $75.88 | — | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 15 | 14 | 6 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +4.7% | +0.4% |
LIVN leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
ITGR vs NVCR vs LIVN vs ANIK vs LAKE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ITGR or NVCR or LIVN or ANIK or LAKE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is the stronger pick with 34. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 9% for Anika Therapeutics, Inc. (ANIK). Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) offers the better valuation at 30. 4x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ITGR or NVCR or LIVN or ANIK or LAKE?
On forward P/E, Integer Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 13.
5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ITGR or NVCR or LIVN or ANIK or LAKE?
Over the past 5 years, Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) delivered a total return of -7.
5%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ITGR returned +165. 1% versus ANIK's -65. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ITGR or NVCR or LIVN or ANIK or LAKE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
72β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 206% more volatile than ITGR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Anika Therapeutics, Inc. (ANIK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ITGR or NVCR or LIVN or ANIK or LAKE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is pulling ahead at 34. 1% versus -5. 9% for Anika Therapeutics, Inc. (ANIK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Anika Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 80. 2% year-over-year, compared to -483. 6% for LivaNova PLC. Over a 3-year CAGR, LAKE leads at 12. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ITGR or NVCR or LIVN or ANIK or LAKE?
Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
6% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 5. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIVN leads at 14. 4% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ITGR or NVCR or LIVN or ANIK or LAKE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) trades at 13.
5x forward P/E versus 16. 8x for LivaNova PLC — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ITGR or NVCR or LIVN or ANIK or LAKE?
In this comparison, LAKE (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. ITGR, NVCR, LIVN, ANIK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ITGR or NVCR or LIVN or ANIK or LAKE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Integer Holdings Corporation (ITGR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
72), +165. 1% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITGR: +165. 1%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ITGR and NVCR and LIVN and ANIK and LAKE?
These companies operate in different sectors (ITGR (Healthcare) and NVCR (Healthcare) and LIVN (Healthcare) and ANIK (Healthcare) and LAKE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ITGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LIVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ANIK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LAKE is a small-cap high-growth stock. LAKE pays a dividend while ITGR, NVCR, LIVN, ANIK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.