Insurance - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ITIC vs WD vs OPEN vs PFSI vs RKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Mortgages
Real Estate - Services
Financial - Mortgages
Financial - Mortgages
ITIC vs WD vs OPEN vs PFSI vs RKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Specialty | Financial - Mortgages | Real Estate - Services | Financial - Mortgages | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $456M | $1.88B | $4.08B | $4.62B | $39.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $273M | $1.23B | $3.94B | $4.36B | $6.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $35M | $72M | $-1.39B | $507M | $-68M |
| Gross Margin | 90.0% | 61.3% | 7.9% | 91.4% | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | 17.3% | -9.9% | 34.6% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | 39.7x | 15.3x | — | 7.2x | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $2.25B | $193M | $23.06B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $299M | $962M | $302M | $2.70B |
ITIC vs WD vs OPEN vs PFSI vs RKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investors Title Com… (ITIC) | 100 | 177.5 | +77.5% |
| Walker & Dunlop, In… (WD) | 100 | 99.9 | -0.1% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 49.6 | -50.4% |
| PennyMac Financial … (PFSI) | 100 | 168.2 | +68.2% |
| Rocket Companies, I… (RKT) | 100 | 50.5 | -49.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ITIC vs WD vs OPEN vs PFSI vs RKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ITIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 2.93x
- Beta 0.77, yield 4.4%, current ratio 2.93x
- 12.9% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
- Beta 0.77 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage
WD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.32, yield 5.0%
- 5.0% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs PFSI's 1.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +5.1% vs WD's -19.6%
PFSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 173.8%, EPS growth 59.2%
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs ITIC's 257.8%
- 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
- Lower P/E (7.2x vs 15.3x)
Among these 5 stocks, RKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 15.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.9% margin vs OPEN's -35.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.0% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs PFSI's 1.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs WD's -19.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 13.7% vs -15.8% |
ITIC vs WD vs OPEN vs PFSI vs RKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ITIC vs WD vs OPEN vs PFSI vs RKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ITIC leads in 3 of 6 categories
OPEN leads 1 • WD leads 1 • PFSI leads 0 • RKT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITIC leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 25.2x ITIC's $273M. ITIC is the more profitable business, keeping 12.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, ITIC holds the edge at -1.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $273M | $1.2B | $3.9B | $4.4B | $6.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $49M | $418M | -$363M | $1.0B | $639M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $35M | $72M | -$1.4B | $507M | -$68M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $25M | -$1.5B | $1.1B | -$3.8B | -$4.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.0% | +61.3% | +7.9% | +91.4% | +91.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +17.3% | -9.9% | +34.6% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +4.6% | -35.2% | +11.5% | -1.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | -55.1% | +27.2% | -32.4% | -58.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.6% | — | -37.6% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.2% | +4.8% | -50.0% | +7.7% | -89.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OPEN and RKT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, PFSI trades at a 71% valuation discount to WD's 33.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WD's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RKT's 41.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $456M | $1.9B | $4.1B | $4.6B | $39.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $443M | $3.8B | $3.3B | $27.4B | $37.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.00x | 33.37x | -3.13x | 9.53x | -282.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 39.69x | 15.28x | — | 7.17x | 19.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.05x | 8.47x | — | 18.11x | 41.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.67x | 1.52x | 0.93x | 1.06x | 5.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.71x | 1.05x | 4.06x | 1.11x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.96x | — | 3.93x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ITIC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITIC delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. ITIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFSI's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ITIC scores 5/9 vs RKT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.2% | +4.1% | -163.2% | +12.0% | -0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.0% | +1.3% | -53.6% | +1.8% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.7% | +4.3% | -15.8% | +4.4% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.0% | +6.0% | -11.7% | +10.4% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 1.29x | 0.19x | 5.35x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | $2.0B | -$769M | $22.8B | -$2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $299M | $962M | $302M | $2.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $2.2B | $193M | $23.1B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.11x | -8.92x | 1.35x | 0.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OPEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PFSI five years ago would be worth $16,366 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,845 for OPEN. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs WD's -19.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPEN at 37.4% vs WD's -0.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.9% | -5.7% | -12.4% | -32.4% | -28.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.5% | -19.6% | +510.1% | -8.0% | +21.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.4% | -0.9% | +159.5% | +59.2% | +77.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.7% | -35.8% | -71.6% | +63.7% | -11.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +257.8% | +200.6% | -50.8% | +603.4% | -20.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.9% | -0.3% | +37.4% | +16.8% | +21.0% |
Risk & Volatility
ITIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ITIC currently trades 83.6% from its 52-week high vs OPEN's 48.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 1.32x | 3.09x | 0.93x | 1.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $288.98 | $90.00 | $10.87 | $160.36 | $24.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $190.20 | $42.12 | $0.51 | $82.67 | $11.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.6% | +60.8% | +48.9% | +55.3% | +58.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.7 | 66.2 | 56.2 | 40.4 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 363K | 36.3M | 604K | 25.0M |
Analyst Outlook
WD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WD as "Buy", OPEN as "Hold", PFSI as "Buy", RKT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.3% upside for PFSI (target: $143) vs 22.2% for OPEN (target: $7). For income investors, WD offers the higher dividend yield at 5.03% vs PFSI's 1.31%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $72.00 | $6.50 | $143.00 | $21.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 26 | 20 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.4% | +5.0% | — | +1.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 | — | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $10.52 | $2.75 | — | $1.16 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
ITIC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OPEN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
ITIC vs WD vs OPEN vs PFSI vs RKT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ITIC or WD or OPEN or PFSI or RKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the stronger pick with 173. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ITIC or WD or OPEN or PFSI or RKT?
On trailing P/E, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus Walker & Dunlop, Inc. at 33. 4x. On forward P/E, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ITIC or WD or OPEN or PFSI or RKT?
Over the past 5 years, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) delivered a total return of +63. 7%, compared to -71. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFSI returned +603. 4% versus OPEN's -50. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ITIC or WD or OPEN or PFSI or RKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Investors Title Company (ITIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
77β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 302% more volatile than ITIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Investors Title Company (ITIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 5% for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ITIC or WD or OPEN or PFSI or RKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is pulling ahead at 173. 8% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. grew EPS 59. 2% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ITIC leads at -1. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ITIC or WD or OPEN or PFSI or RKT?
Investors Title Company (ITIC) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
9% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFSI leads at 34. 6% versus -6. 2% for OPEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ITIC leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ITIC or WD or OPEN or PFSI or RKT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 39. 7x for Investors Title Company — 32. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PFSI: 61. 3% to $143. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ITIC or WD or OPEN or PFSI or RKT?
In this comparison, WD (5.
0% yield), ITIC (4. 4% yield), PFSI (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. OPEN, RKT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ITIC or WD or OPEN or PFSI or RKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 1. 3% yield, +603. 4% 10Y return). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFSI: +603. 4%, OPEN: -50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ITIC and WD and OPEN and PFSI and RKT?
These companies operate in different sectors (ITIC (Financial Services) and WD (Financial Services) and OPEN (Real Estate) and PFSI (Financial Services) and RKT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ITIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; WD is a small-cap income-oriented stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PFSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; RKT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. ITIC, WD, PFSI pay a dividend while OPEN, RKT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.