Other Precious Metals
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
ITRG vs EXK vs MUX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Other Precious Metals
Other Precious Metals
ITRG vs EXK vs MUX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Other Precious Metals | Other Precious Metals | Other Precious Metals |
| Market Cap | $582M | $2.95B | $1.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $218M | $330M | $236M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $-94M | $74M |
| Gross Margin | 31.9% | 9.3% | 23.3% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | -1.7% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | 6.2x | 14.2x | 21.0x |
| Total Debt | $25M | $120M | $926K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $52M | $106M | $51M |
ITRG vs EXK vs MUX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Integra Resources C… (ITRG) | 100 | 27.6 | -72.4% |
| Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK) | 100 | 232.3 | +132.3% |
| McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) | 100 | 175.6 | +75.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ITRG vs EXK vs MUX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ITRG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 19.5%, current ratio 2.28x
- Beta 1.22, current ratio 2.28x
- 208.4% revenue growth vs EXK's 5.9%
EXK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 179.5% 10Y total return vs MUX's 3.5%
MUX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.49
- Rev growth 13.2%, EPS growth 168.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.4%
- 31.4% margin vs EXK's -28.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 208.4% revenue growth vs EXK's 5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 21.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.4% margin vs EXK's -28.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.22 vs EXK's 1.80, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +227.9% vs ITRG's +67.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs EXK's -9.2%, ROIC -1.9% vs 1.5% |
ITRG vs EXK vs MUX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ITRG vs EXK vs MUX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITRG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXK is the larger business by revenue, generating $330M annually — 1.5x ITRG's $218M. MUX is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXK's -28.4%. On growth, EXK holds the edge at +154.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $218M | $330M | $236M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $67M | $49M | $34M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | -$94M | $74M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $47M | -$129M | -$24M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +9.3% | +23.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | -1.7% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | -28.4% | +31.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.6% | -39.1% | -10.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +154.0% | +107.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.1% | -97.5% | +4.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ITRG and EXK each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, EXK's 75.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MUX's 77.9x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $582M | $3.0B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $556M | $3.0B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -28.90x | -77.19x | 41.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.21x | 14.18x | 20.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 75.17x | 77.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 19.19x | 13.56x | 7.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.14x | 5.02x | 2.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MUX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MUX delivers a 13.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-18 for EXK. MUX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXK's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ITRG scores 6/9 vs EXK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | -18.4% | +13.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.1% | -9.2% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.0% | +1.5% | -1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.4% | +1.6% | -1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.25x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$27M | $14M | -$50M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52M | $106M | $51M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $25M | $120M | $926,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.11x | -39.17x | 1.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MUX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MUX five years ago would be worth $19,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,765 for ITRG. Over the past 12 months, MUX leads with a +227.9% total return vs ITRG's +67.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MUX at 39.8% vs ITRG's 25.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.7% | +11.3% | +29.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +67.1% | +198.7% | +227.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.3% | +141.2% | +173.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.3% | +67.0% | +93.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.4% | +179.5% | +3.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.6% | +34.1% | +39.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ITRG and MUX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITRG is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXK's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MUX currently trades 81.6% from its 52-week high vs ITRG's 59.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 1.80x | 1.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.87 | $15.15 | $29.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.41 | $3.14 | $6.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.3% | +66.2% | +81.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.3 | 56.2 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 9.3M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
MUX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ITRG as "Buy", EXK as "Buy", MUX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 142.2% upside for ITRG (target: $7) vs 23.8% for MUX (target: $30).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $12.75 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 14 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MUX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ITRG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
ITRG vs EXK vs MUX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ITRG or EXK or MUX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, McEwen Mining Inc.
(MUX) is the stronger pick with 13. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) offers the better valuation at 41. 1x trailing P/E (21. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Integra Resources Corp. (ITRG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ITRG or EXK or MUX?
On forward P/E, Integra Resources Corp.
is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ITRG or EXK or MUX?
Over the past 5 years, McEwen Mining Inc.
(MUX) delivered a total return of +93. 8%, compared to -62. 3% for Integra Resources Corp. (ITRG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXK returned +179. 5% versus ITRG's -72. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ITRG or EXK or MUX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Integra Resources Corp.
(ITRG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 22β versus Endeavour Silver Corp. 's 1. 80β — meaning EXK is approximately 47% more volatile than ITRG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 25% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ITRG or EXK or MUX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), McEwen Mining Inc.
(MUX) is pulling ahead at 13. 2% versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: McEwen Mining Inc. grew EPS 168. 6% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MUX leads at 21. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ITRG or EXK or MUX?
McEwen Mining Inc.
(MUX) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 4% net margin versus -31. 3% for Integra Resources Corp. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXK leads at 3. 8% versus -51. 7% for ITRG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXK leads at 19. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ITRG or EXK or MUX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Integra Resources Corp.
(ITRG) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 21. 0x for McEwen Mining Inc. — 14. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ITRG: 142. 2% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ITRG or EXK or MUX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ITRG or EXK or MUX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Integra Resources Corp.
(ITRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22)). Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITRG: -72. 4%, EXK: +179. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ITRG and EXK and MUX?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.