Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IVVD vs ADMA vs ALNY vs ARCT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
IVVD vs ADMA vs ALNY vs ARCT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $102M | $1.90B | $37.74B | $198M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $56M | $510M | $4.29B | $45M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-78M | $165M | $577M | $-79M |
| Gross Margin | 92.0% | 61.3% | 80.9% | 91.2% |
| Operating Margin | -146.4% | 42.1% | 17.5% | -196.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.9x | 37.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $80M | $1.28B | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $227M | $88M | $1.66B | $231M |
IVVD vs ADMA vs ALNY vs ARCT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) | 100 | 612.7 | +512.7% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 140.4 | +40.4% |
| Arcturus Therapeuti… (ARCT) | 100 | 12.7 | -87.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IVVD vs ADMA vs ALNY vs ARCT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IVVD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.03, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 7.24x
- 110.5% revenue growth vs ARCT's -51.4%
ADMA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.11
- Beta 1.11, current ratio 6.71x
- Better valuation composite
- 32.4% margin vs ARCT's -173.5%
ALNY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- 366.4% 10Y total return vs ADMA's 15.3%
- Beta 0.60 vs ARCT's 2.46
- -7.2% vs ADMA's -62.0%
ARCT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 110.5% revenue growth vs ARCT's -51.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.4% margin vs ARCT's -173.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs ARCT's 2.46 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -7.2% vs ADMA's -62.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs IVVD's -41.6%, ROIC 36.0% vs -494.9% |
IVVD vs ADMA vs ALNY vs ARCT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IVVD vs ADMA vs ALNY vs ARCT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ADMA leads in 5 of 6 categories
ALNY leads 1 • IVVD leads 0 • ARCT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADMA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 94.5x ARCT's $45M. ADMA is the more profitable business, keeping 32.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARCT's -173.5%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $56M | $510M | $4.3B | $45M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$80M | $221M | $677M | -$86M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$78M | $165M | $577M | -$79M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$79M | $108M | $641M | -$59M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.0% | +61.3% | +80.9% | +91.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -146.4% | +42.1% | +17.5% | -196.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -138.9% | +32.4% | +13.5% | -173.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -142.2% | +21.2% | +15.0% | -129.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | -0.3% | +96.4% | -97.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +72.7% | +4.4% | -82.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ADMA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.7x trailing earnings, ADMA trades at a 89% valuation discount to ALNY's 121.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ADMA's 9.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALNY's 67.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $102M | $1.9B | $37.7B | $198M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$122M | $1.9B | $37.4B | -$8M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.57x | 13.68x | 121.39x | -2.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.92x | 37.74x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.50x | 67.05x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.91x | 3.73x | 10.16x | 2.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 4.21x | 48.27x | 0.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 68.40x | 81.09x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ADMA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $-53 for IVVD. IVVD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALNY's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs ARCT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -53.5% | +39.0% | +98.3% | -36.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.6% | +27.4% | +11.8% | -28.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.9% | +36.0% | +33.4% | -2.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.8% | +38.8% | +15.3% | -29.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.17x | 1.62x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$224M | -$8M | -$379M | -$206M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $227M | $88M | $1.7B | $231M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $80M | $1.3B | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 50.85x | 2.02x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ADMA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ADMA five years ago would be worth $44,620 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $369 for IVVD. Over the past 12 months, ALNY leads with a -7.2% total return vs ADMA's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADMA at 28.5% vs ARCT's -36.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -69.2% | -54.1% | -29.3% | +11.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.1% | -62.0% | -7.2% | -44.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.8% | +112.1% | +46.5% | -74.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | +346.2% | +69.7% | -80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | +15.3% | +366.4% | -79.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.0% | +28.5% | +13.6% | -36.6% |
Risk & Volatility
ALNY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALNY is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARCT's 2.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALNY currently trades 57.1% from its 52-week high vs IVVD's 25.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 1.11x | 0.60x | 2.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.07 | $22.20 | $495.55 | $24.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.48 | $7.21 | $281.76 | $5.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.1% | +37.0% | +57.1% | +28.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.0 | 44.9 | 44.0 | 39.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 5.0M | 1.0M | 398K |
Analyst Outlook
ADMA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IVVD as "Buy", ADMA as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy", ARCT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1133.8% upside for IVVD (target: $10) vs 57.6% for ALNY (target: $446).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.50 | $21.00 | $445.67 | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 10 | 52 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ADMA leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ALNY leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
IVVD vs ADMA vs ALNY vs ARCT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IVVD or ADMA or ALNY or ARCT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Invivyd, Inc.
(IVVD) is the stronger pick with 110. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 4% for Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT). ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) offers the better valuation at 13. 7x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IVVD or ADMA or ALNY or ARCT?
On trailing P/E, ADMA Biologics, Inc.
(ADMA) is the cheapest at 13. 7x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 121. 4x. On forward P/E, ADMA Biologics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IVVD or ADMA or ALNY or ARCT?
Over the past 5 years, ADMA Biologics, Inc.
(ADMA) delivered a total return of +346. 2%, compared to -96. 3% for Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALNY returned +366. 4% versus IVVD's -96. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IVVD or ADMA or ALNY or ARCT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. 's 2. 46β — meaning ARCT is approximately 308% more volatile than ALNY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 162% for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IVVD or ADMA or ALNY or ARCT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Invivyd, Inc.
(IVVD) is pulling ahead at 110. 5% versus -51. 4% for Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -25. 9% for ADMA Biologics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IVVD or ADMA or ALNY or ARCT?
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
(ADMA) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 8% net margin versus -98. 2% for Invivyd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ADMA leads at 37. 5% versus -111. 5% for ARCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARCT leads at 95. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IVVD or ADMA or ALNY or ARCT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ADMA Biologics, Inc.
(ADMA) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 37. 7x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 27. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IVVD: 1133. 8% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — IVVD or ADMA or ALNY or ARCT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is IVVD or ADMA or ALNY or ARCT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), +366. 4% 10Y return). Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALNY: +366. 4%, IVVD: -96. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IVVD and ADMA and ALNY and ARCT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IVVD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ADMA is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ARCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.