Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JBTM vs MIDD vs TRMK vs PFGC vs SYY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Banks - Regional
Food Distribution
Food Distribution
JBTM vs MIDD vs TRMK vs PFGC vs SYY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Banks - Regional | Food Distribution | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $7.18B | $7.38B | $2.64B | $14.57B | $34.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.88B | $3.73B | $1.12B | $66.75B | $83.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $168M | $-278M | $224M | $329M | $1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 35.3% | 37.9% | 71.0% | 11.9% | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | -2.5% | 25.5% | 1.2% | 3.6% |
| Forward P/E | 16.8x | 17.0x | 11.5x | 19.9x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.88B | $2.17B | $1.12B | $8.00B | $14.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $187M | $222M | $668M | $79M | $1.07B |
JBTM vs MIDD vs TRMK vs PFGC vs SYY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| JBT Marel Corporati… (JBTM) | 100 | 167.9 | +67.9% |
| The Middleby Corpor… (MIDD) | 100 | 232.3 | +132.3% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
| Performance Food Gr… (PFGC) | 100 | 347.9 | +247.9% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 132.1 | +32.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JBTM vs MIDD vs TRMK vs PFGC vs SYY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JBTM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 121.3%, EPS growth -137.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.7%
- 121.3% revenue growth vs MIDD's -17.4%
MIDD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TRMK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 19.9x)
- 20.0% margin vs MIDD's -7.4%
- +32.5% vs SYY's +6.4%
PFGC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 249.2% 10Y total return vs JBTM's 156.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, current ratio 1.58x
SYY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 2.8%
- PEG 0.29 vs TRMK's 1.42
- Beta 0.47, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.47 vs JBTM's 1.30
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 121.3% revenue growth vs MIDD's -17.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 19.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.0% margin vs MIDD's -7.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs JBTM's 1.30 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs JBTM's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.5% vs SYY's +6.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs MIDD's -4.1%, ROIC 15.7% vs 8.7% |
JBTM vs MIDD vs TRMK vs PFGC vs SYY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
JBTM vs MIDD vs TRMK vs PFGC vs SYY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRMK leads in 3 of 6 categories
SYY leads 2 • JBTM leads 0 • MIDD leads 0 • PFGC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYY is the larger business by revenue, generating $83.6B annually — 74.6x TRMK's $1.1B. TRMK is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MIDD's -7.4%. On growth, JBTM holds the edge at +9.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.9B | $3.7B | $1.1B | $66.7B | $83.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $557M | $26M | $323M | $1.0B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $168M | -$278M | $224M | $329M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $317M | $559M | $230M | $1.0B | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.3% | +37.9% | +71.0% | +11.9% | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | -2.5% | +25.5% | +1.2% | +3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | -7.4% | +20.0% | +0.5% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +15.0% | +20.7% | +1.5% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.6% | -14.5% | — | +6.4% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +125.7% | -64.3% | +5.4% | -27.0% | -13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 71% valuation discount to PFGC's 42.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.36x vs TRMK's 1.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.2B | $7.4B | $2.6B | $14.6B | $34.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.9B | $9.3B | $3.1B | $22.5B | $48.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -139.32x | -29.41x | 12.13x | 42.53x | 19.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.81x | 17.03x | 11.50x | 19.88x | 15.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.50x | — | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.79x | 13.56x | 9.49x | 14.65x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.89x | 2.30x | 2.36x | 0.23x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.62x | 2.94x | 1.28x | 3.24x | 19.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.15x | 13.21x | 11.39x | 20.69x | 19.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $-9 for MIDD. JBTM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.42x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRMK scores 7/9 vs JBTM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.8% | -8.5% | +10.8% | +7.1% | +80.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | -4.1% | +1.2% | +1.8% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +8.7% | +7.1% | +5.7% | +15.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +10.1% | +3.2% | +7.1% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 0.78x | 0.53x | 1.79x | 7.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $2.0B | $448M | $7.9B | $13.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $187M | $222M | $668M | $79M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $2.2B | $1.1B | $8.0B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.83x | -1.20x | 0.75x | 1.69x | 4.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PFGC five years ago would be worth $16,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,654 for MIDD. Over the past 12 months, TRMK leads with a +32.5% total return vs SYY's +6.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRMK at 29.8% vs SYY's 1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.3% | +4.9% | +15.5% | +5.3% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.2% | +20.2% | +32.5% | +11.8% | +6.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.3% | +8.6% | +118.5% | +51.6% | +4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.5% | -13.5% | +47.6% | +69.7% | -3.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +156.3% | +46.1% | +127.7% | +249.2% | +82.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.8% | +2.8% | +29.8% | +14.9% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRMK and SYY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYY is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JBTM's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs SYY's 79.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 1.22x | 0.94x | 0.60x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $170.19 | $169.44 | $45.99 | $109.05 | $91.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $105.27 | $110.82 | $33.39 | $77.44 | $68.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.0% | +93.4% | +97.6% | +85.0% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 52.2 | 56.0 | 59.3 | 41.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 547K | 571K | 392K | 1.7M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SYY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JBTM as "Buy", MIDD as "Buy", TRMK as "Hold", PFGC as "Buy", SYY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.5% upside for JBTM (target: $180) vs 1.4% for TRMK (target: $46). For income investors, SYY offers the higher dividend yield at 2.80% vs JBTM's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $180.00 | $176.67 | $45.50 | $111.75 | $90.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 20 | 9 | 25 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — | +2.2% | — | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | — | $0.97 | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.8% | +3.0% | +0.5% | +3.6% |
TRMK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SYY leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
JBTM vs MIDD vs TRMK vs PFGC vs SYY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JBTM or MIDD or TRMK or PFGC or SYY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JBT Marel Corporation (JBTM) is the stronger pick with 121.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for The Middleby Corporation (MIDD). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JBT Marel Corporation (JBTM) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JBTM or MIDD or TRMK or PFGC or SYY?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Performance Food Group Company at 42. 5x. On forward P/E, Trustmark Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus Trustmark Corporation's 1. 42x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JBTM or MIDD or TRMK or PFGC or SYY?
Over the past 5 years, Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) delivered a total return of +69.
7%, compared to -13. 5% for The Middleby Corporation (MIDD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFGC returned +249. 2% versus MIDD's +46. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JBTM or MIDD or TRMK or PFGC or SYY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus JBT Marel Corporation's 1. 30β — meaning JBTM is approximately 176% more volatile than SYY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JBT Marel Corporation (JBTM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 42% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JBTM or MIDD or TRMK or PFGC or SYY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JBT Marel Corporation (JBTM) is pulling ahead at 121.
3% versus -17. 4% for The Middleby Corporation (MIDD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trustmark Corporation grew EPS 1. 9% year-over-year, compared to -168. 1% for The Middleby Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, JBTM leads at 33. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JBTM or MIDD or TRMK or PFGC or SYY?
Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
0% net margin versus -8. 7% for The Middleby Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMK leads at 25. 5% versus 1. 3% for PFGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMK leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JBTM or MIDD or TRMK or PFGC or SYY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Trustmark Corporation's 1. 42x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 19. 9x for Performance Food Group Company — 8. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JBTM: 30. 5% to $180. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JBTM or MIDD or TRMK or PFGC or SYY?
In this comparison, SYY (2.
8% yield), TRMK (2. 2% yield), JBTM (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. MIDD, PFGC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JBTM or MIDD or TRMK or PFGC or SYY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
47), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYY: +82. 2%, JBTM: +156. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JBTM and MIDD and TRMK and PFGC and SYY?
These companies operate in different sectors (JBTM (Industrials) and MIDD (Industrials) and TRMK (Financial Services) and PFGC (Consumer Defensive) and SYY (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JBTM is a small-cap high-growth stock; MIDD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; PFGC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TRMK, SYY pay a dividend while JBTM, MIDD, PFGC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.