Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JCSE vs PESI vs ENVX vs CWST vs CLH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Waste Management
Waste Management
JCSE vs PESI vs ENVX vs CWST vs CLH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Waste Management | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Waste Management | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $13M | $204M | $1.37B | $5.35B | $15.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37M | $59M | $32M | $1.88B | $6.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $551K | $-18M | $-157M | $7M | $395M |
| Gross Margin | 25.6% | 4.1% | 15.4% | 17.4% | 30.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | -26.3% | -5.6% | 4.5% | 11.2% |
| Forward P/E | 222.6x | — | — | 62.7x | 34.5x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $4M | $21M | $1.24B | $3.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $12M | $106M | $124M | $826M |
JCSE vs PESI vs ENVX vs CWST vs CLH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| JE Cleantech Holdin… (JCSE) | 100 | 8.5 | -91.5% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 193.3 | +93.3% |
| Enovix Corporation (ENVX) | 100 | 73.1 | -26.9% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 103.9 | +3.9% |
| Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) | 100 | 277.5 | +177.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JCSE vs PESI vs ENVX vs CWST vs CLH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JCSE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.24, Low D/E 61.1%, current ratio 2.55x
- Beta 0.24, yield 9.0%, current ratio 2.55x
- Beta 0.24 vs ENVX's 3.35
- 9.0% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
PESI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ENVX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 37.9%, EPS growth 40.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 37.9% revenue growth vs CLH's 2.4%
CWST is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.33
CLH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs CWST's 10.6%
- Lower P/E (34.5x vs 62.7x)
- 6.5% margin vs ENVX's -492.6%
- 5.2% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 9.8% vs -21.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.9% revenue growth vs CLH's 2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (34.5x vs 62.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.5% margin vs ENVX's -492.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs ENVX's 3.35 | |
| Dividends | 9.0% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +72.6% vs CWST's -27.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 9.8% vs -21.7% |
JCSE vs PESI vs ENVX vs CWST vs CLH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JCSE vs PESI vs ENVX vs CWST vs CLH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CLH leads in 3 of 6 categories
JCSE leads 1 • PESI leads 0 • ENVX leads 0 • CWST leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 190.4x ENVX's $32M. CLH is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ENVX's -4.9%. On growth, ENVX holds the edge at +15.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37M | $59M | $32M | $1.9B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | -$14M | -$142M | $414M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $551,000 | -$18M | -$157M | $7M | $395M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | -$13M | -$114M | $102M | $466M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.6% | +4.1% | +15.4% | +17.4% | +30.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | -26.3% | -5.6% | +4.5% | +11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | -30.1% | -4.9% | +0.4% | +6.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | -22.0% | -3.6% | +5.5% | +7.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.4% | -20.1% | +15.9% | +9.6% | +1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.3% | -110.5% | +20.0% | -18.6% | +9.2% |
Valuation Metrics
JCSE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 40.0x trailing earnings, CLH trades at a 94% valuation discount to CWST's 712.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CWST's 15.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JCSE's 22.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $204M | $1.4B | $5.4B | $15.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17M | $197M | $1.3B | $6.5B | $18.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 222.58x | -14.67x | -8.81x | 712.00x | 39.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 62.70x | 34.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.27x | — | — | 15.74x | 16.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.87x | 3.31x | 43.13x | 2.91x | 2.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.43x | 4.05x | 5.01x | 3.46x | 5.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.03x | — | — | 63.16x | 35.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLH delivers a 14.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PESI. ENVX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLH's 1.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JCSE scores 6/9 vs CWST's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.3% | -34.5% | -0.1% | +0.5% | +14.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | -20.2% | -0.0% | +0.2% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | -21.7% | -74.2% | +2.6% | +9.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | -16.7% | -27.5% | +2.9% | +10.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 0.09x | 0.08x | 0.79x | 1.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | -$7M | -$85M | $1.1B | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $12M | $106M | $124M | $826M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $4M | $21M | $1.2B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.04x | -42.14x | -7.03x | 1.12x | 6.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLH five years ago would be worth $31,039 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $364 for JCSE. Over the past 12 months, JCSE leads with a +72.6% total return vs CWST's -27.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLH at 28.6% vs ENVX's -20.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +85.5% | -10.2% | -16.2% | -13.4% | +19.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +72.6% | +15.8% | +2.0% | -27.9% | +28.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.4% | +19.8% | -50.4% | -6.3% | +112.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.4% | +46.7% | -47.1% | +26.6% | +210.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.4% | +174.4% | -47.3% | +1059.3% | +515.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.3% | +6.2% | -20.8% | -2.2% | +28.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JCSE and CLH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JCSE is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENVX's 3.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLH currently trades 91.9% from its 52-week high vs ENVX's 40.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.24x | 1.74x | 3.35x | 0.33x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.50 | $16.50 | $16.49 | $121.04 | $316.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.77 | $8.02 | $4.62 | $74.05 | $201.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.2% | +66.7% | +40.1% | +70.6% | +91.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.9 | 35.7 | 52.1 | 54.3 | 34.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 832K | 164K | 5.6M | 849K | 516K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PESI and CWST each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PESI as "Hold", ENVX as "Buy", CWST as "Buy", CLH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 66.4% upside for ENVX (target: $11) vs 2.8% for CLH (target: $299). JCSE is the only dividend payer here at 8.99% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $11.00 | $112.33 | $299.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 16 | 19 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.13 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +4.3% | 0.0% | +1.6% |
CLH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JCSE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
JCSE vs PESI vs ENVX vs CWST vs CLH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JCSE or PESI or ENVX or CWST or CLH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Enovix Corporation (ENVX) is the stronger pick with 37.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH). Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) offers the better valuation at 40. 0x trailing P/E (34. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enovix Corporation (ENVX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JCSE or PESI or ENVX or CWST or CLH?
On trailing P/E, Clean Harbors, Inc.
(CLH) is the cheapest at 40. 0x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 0x. On forward P/E, Clean Harbors, Inc. is actually cheaper at 34. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JCSE or PESI or ENVX or CWST or CLH?
Over the past 5 years, Clean Harbors, Inc.
(CLH) delivered a total return of +210. 4%, compared to -96. 4% for JE Cleantech Holdings Limited (JCSE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus JCSE's -96. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JCSE or PESI or ENVX or CWST or CLH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JE Cleantech Holdings Limited (JCSE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
24β versus Enovix Corporation's 3. 35β — meaning ENVX is approximately 1301% more volatile than JCSE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Enovix Corporation (ENVX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 126% for Clean Harbors, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JCSE or PESI or ENVX or CWST or CLH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Enovix Corporation (ENVX) is pulling ahead at 37.
9% versus 2. 4% for Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to -93. 7% for JE Cleantech Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, ENVX leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JCSE or PESI or ENVX or CWST or CLH?
Clean Harbors, Inc.
(CLH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus -492. 6% for Enovix Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLH leads at 11. 2% versus -557. 0% for ENVX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLH leads at 29. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JCSE or PESI or ENVX or CWST or CLH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Clean Harbors, Inc.
(CLH) trades at 34. 5x forward P/E versus 62. 7x for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — 28. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENVX: 66. 4% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JCSE or PESI or ENVX or CWST or CLH?
In this comparison, JCSE (9.
0% yield) pays a dividend. PESI, ENVX, CWST, CLH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JCSE or PESI or ENVX or CWST or CLH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), +1059% 10Y return). Enovix Corporation (ENVX) carries a higher beta of 3. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, ENVX: -47. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JCSE and PESI and ENVX and CWST and CLH?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JCSE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ENVX is a small-cap high-growth stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. JCSE pays a dividend while PESI, ENVX, CWST, CLH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.