Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

JG vs APPS vs MGNI vs PUBM vs META

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
JG
Aurora Mobile Limited

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$113M
5Y Perf.-90.6%
APPS
Digital Turbine, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$477M
5Y Perf.-92.9%
MGNI
Magnite, Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.01B
5Y Perf.-54.4%
PUBM
PubMatic, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$485M
5Y Perf.-63.4%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.56T
5Y Perf.+125.8%

JG vs APPS vs MGNI vs PUBM vs META — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
JG logoJG
APPS logoAPPS
MGNI logoMGNI
PUBM logoPUBM
META logoMETA
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - ApplicationAdvertising AgenciesSoftware - ApplicationInternet Content & Information
Market Cap$113M$477M$2.01B$485M$1.56T
Revenue (TTM)$300M$532M$723M$282M$214.96B
Net Income (TTM)$-78M$-42M$159M$-17M$70.59B
Gross Margin68.7%60.1%63.4%63.2%81.9%
Operating Margin-22.8%0.1%14.8%-7.3%41.2%
Forward P/E10.1x13.4x20.4x
Total Debt$21M$418M$279M$44M$83.90B
Cash & Equiv.$119M$40M$553M$146M$35.87B

JG vs APPS vs MGNI vs PUBM vs METALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

JG
APPS
MGNI
PUBM
META
StockDec 20May 26Return
Aurora Mobile Limit… (JG)1009.4-90.6%
Digital Turbine, In… (APPS)1007.1-92.9%
Magnite, Inc. (MGNI)10045.6-54.4%
PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM)10036.6-63.4%
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META)100225.8+125.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: JG vs APPS vs MGNI vs PUBM vs META

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: META leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Aurora Mobile Limited is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. APPS and MGNI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
JG
Aurora Mobile Limited
The Income Pick

JG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • beta 0.33
  • Beta 0.33 vs APPS's 1.72, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability
APPS
Digital Turbine, Inc.
The Value Play

APPS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (10.1x vs 20.4x)
Best for: value
MGNI
Magnite, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

MGNI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +12.6% vs JG's -21.7%
Best for: momentum
PUBM
PubMatic, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

PUBM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 16.7%, current ratio 1.39x
  • Beta 1.51, current ratio 1.39x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
The Growth Play

META carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 22.2%, EPS growth -1.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.9%
  • 421.2% 10Y total return vs MGNI's -4.7%
  • 22.2% revenue growth vs APPS's -9.9%
  • 32.8% margin vs JG's -25.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMETA logoMETA22.2% revenue growth vs APPS's -9.9%
ValueAPPS logoAPPSLower P/E (10.1x vs 20.4x)
Quality / MarginsMETA logoMETA32.8% margin vs JG's -25.9%
Stability / SafetyJG logoJGBeta 0.33 vs APPS's 1.72, lower leverage
DividendsMETA logoMETA0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MGNI logoMGNI+12.6% vs JG's -21.7%
Efficiency (ROA)META logoMETA20.8% ROA vs JG's -25.5%, ROIC 27.6% vs -7.0%

JG vs APPS vs MGNI vs PUBM vs META — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

JGAurora Mobile Limited
FY 2024
Subscription Services
62.2%$197M
Vertical Applications
27.4%$87M
Value Added Services
10.4%$33M
APPSDigital Turbine, Inc.
FY 2022
On Device Media
100.0%$503M
MGNIMagnite, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PUBMPubMatic, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$283M
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.
FY 2025
Family of Apps
98.9%$198.8B
Reality Labs
1.1%$2.2B

JG vs APPS vs MGNI vs PUBM vs META — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMETALAGGINGPUBM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

META leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

META is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.0B annually — 763.2x PUBM's $282M. META is the more profitable business, keeping 32.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JG's -25.9%. On growth, META holds the edge at +33.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricJG logoJGAurora Mobile Lim…APPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.PUBM logoPUBMPubMatic, Inc.META logoMETAMeta Platforms, I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$300M$532M$723M$282M$215.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$78M$70M$145M$11M$109.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$78M-$42M$159M-$17M$70.6B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$554M$19M$44M$43M$48.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+68.7%+60.1%+63.4%+63.2%+81.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-22.8%+0.1%+14.8%-7.3%+41.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-25.9%-7.9%+22.0%-6.2%+32.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+184.7%+3.5%+6.1%+15.1%+22.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-7.9%+12.4%+5.5%-2.0%+33.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+67.4%+113.6%+142.9%-35.0%+62.4%
META leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — APPS and PUBM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.7x trailing earnings, MGNI trades at a 44% valuation discount to META's 26.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGNI's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APPS's 29.7x.

MetricJG logoJGAurora Mobile Lim…APPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.PUBM logoPUBMPubMatic, Inc.META logoMETAMeta Platforms, I…
Market CapShares × price$113M$477M$2.0B$485M$1.56T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$99M$855M$1.7B$384M$1.61T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-38.09x-4.48x14.74x-33.03x26.26x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.10x13.45x20.36x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple29.66x11.43x14.47x15.81x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.44x0.97x2.81x1.72x7.78x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.72x2.69x2.33x1.83x7.31x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF216.38x12.11x7.28x33.90x
Evenly matched — APPS and PUBM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

META leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

META delivers a 33.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-73 for JG. PUBM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APPS's 2.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JG scores 6/9 vs APPS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricJG logoJGAurora Mobile Lim…APPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.PUBM logoPUBMPubMatic, Inc.META logoMETAMeta Platforms, I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-73.2%-21.5%+18.6%-7.0%+33.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-25.5%-4.9%+5.3%-2.6%+20.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-7.0%-7.4%+9.5%-6.8%+27.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-8.8%-8.9%+7.3%-5.5%+29.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964655
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.21x2.72x0.30x0.17x0.39x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$98M$378M-$275M-$102M$48.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$119M$40M$553M$146M$35.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$21M$418M$279M$44M$83.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-80.09x-1.83x4.03x78.84x
META leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

META leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in META five years ago would be worth $19,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $613 for APPS. Over the past 12 months, MGNI leads with a +12.6% total return vs JG's -21.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors META at 38.6% vs APPS's -30.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricJG logoJGAurora Mobile Lim…APPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.PUBM logoPUBMPubMatic, Inc.META logoMETAMeta Platforms, I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+6.6%-16.5%-12.8%+19.2%-5.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-21.7%+10.5%+12.6%+2.0%+3.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-4.9%-66.5%+58.7%-18.5%+166.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-89.4%-93.9%-60.9%-77.1%+94.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.2%+353.4%-4.7%-65.2%+421.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-1.6%-30.6%+16.7%-6.6%+38.6%
META leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — JG and META each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

JG is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than APPS's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. META currently trades 77.5% from its 52-week high vs APPS's 48.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricJG logoJGAurora Mobile Lim…APPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.PUBM logoPUBMPubMatic, Inc.META logoMETAMeta Platforms, I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.33x1.72x1.63x1.51x1.59x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$12.80$8.28$26.65$13.88$796.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.85$2.74$10.82$6.21$520.26
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+52.0%+48.2%+52.5%+73.8%+77.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.062.955.466.542.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3K2.1M2.1M746K15.6M
Evenly matched — JG and META each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: JG as "Buy", APPS as "Hold", MGNI as "Buy", PUBM as "Buy", META as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 150.6% upside for APPS (target: $10) vs 5.1% for JG (target: $7). META is the only dividend payer here at 0.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricJG logoJGAurora Mobile Lim…APPS logoAPPSDigital Turbine, …MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.PUBM logoPUBMPubMatic, Inc.META logoMETAMeta Platforms, I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.00$10.00$18.00$14.00$821.80
# AnalystsCovering analysts411311660
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.07
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%0.0%+2.3%+9.6%+1.7%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

META leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallMeta Platforms, Inc. (META)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

JG vs APPS vs MGNI vs PUBM vs META: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is JG or APPS or MGNI or PUBM or META a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Meta Platforms, Inc.

(META) is the stronger pick with 22. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Digital Turbine, Inc. (APPS). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aurora Mobile Limited (JG) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — JG or APPS or MGNI or PUBM or META?

On trailing P/E, Magnite, Inc.

(MGNI) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Meta Platforms, Inc. at 26. 3x. On forward P/E, Digital Turbine, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — JG or APPS or MGNI or PUBM or META?

Over the past 5 years, Meta Platforms, Inc.

(META) delivered a total return of +94. 8%, compared to -93. 9% for Digital Turbine, Inc. (APPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: META returned +421. 2% versus JG's -96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — JG or APPS or MGNI or PUBM or META?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aurora Mobile Limited (JG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

33β versus Digital Turbine, Inc. 's 1. 72β — meaning APPS is approximately 422% more volatile than JG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for Digital Turbine, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — JG or APPS or MGNI or PUBM or META?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Meta Platforms, Inc.

(META) is pulling ahead at 22. 2% versus -9. 9% for Digital Turbine, Inc. (APPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to -234. 8% for PubMatic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, META leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — JG or APPS or MGNI or PUBM or META?

Meta Platforms, Inc.

(META) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 1% net margin versus -18. 8% for Digital Turbine, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: META leads at 41. 4% versus -11. 0% for APPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — META leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is JG or APPS or MGNI or PUBM or META more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Digital Turbine, Inc.

(APPS) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for Meta Platforms, Inc. — 10. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APPS: 150. 6% to $10. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — JG or APPS or MGNI or PUBM or META?

In this comparison, META (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. JG, APPS, MGNI, PUBM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is JG or APPS or MGNI or PUBM or META better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Aurora Mobile Limited (JG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

33)). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JG: -96. 2%, MGNI: -4. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between JG and APPS and MGNI and PUBM and META?

These companies operate in different sectors (JG (Technology) and APPS (Technology) and MGNI (Communication Services) and PUBM (Technology) and META (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: JG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APPS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock; PUBM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; META is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

JG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 41%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

APPS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MGNI

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PUBM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 37%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

META

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform JG and APPS and MGNI and PUBM and META on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(JG: -7.9% · APPS: 12.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.