Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
JJSF vs NWFL vs CZWI vs RMCF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Food Confectioners
JJSF vs NWFL vs CZWI vs RMCF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Food Confectioners |
| Market Cap | $1.44B | $283M | $203M | $20M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.55B | $136M | $90M | $30M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $28M | $14M | $-4M |
| Gross Margin | 30.5% | 63.6% | 54.7% | 21.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 26.1% | 7.0% | -10.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.5x | 8.9x | 11.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $164M | $74M | $52M | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $106M | $44M | $119M | $720K |
JJSF vs NWFL vs CZWI vs RMCF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| J&J Snack Foods Cor… (JJSF) | 100 | 58.9 | -41.1% |
| Norwood Financial C… (NWFL) | 100 | 125.2 | +25.2% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| Rocky Mountain Choc… (RMCF) | 100 | 59.2 | -40.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JJSF vs NWFL vs CZWI vs RMCF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JJSF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 4.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 16.9%, current ratio 2.72x
- PEG 0.62 vs CZWI's 2.32
- Beta 0.15, yield 4.1%, current ratio 2.72x
NWFL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and bank quality is your priority.
- Rev growth 34.2%, EPS growth 152.5%
- NIM 3.2% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- 34.2% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- Better valuation composite
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 157.0% 10Y total return vs NWFL's 120.6%
RMCF is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +103.2% vs JJSF's -30.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.2% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs RMCF's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs RMCF's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.2% vs JJSF's -30.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs RMCF's -19.5%, ROIC 6.1% vs -35.7% |
JJSF vs NWFL vs CZWI vs RMCF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JJSF vs NWFL vs CZWI vs RMCF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NWFL leads in 3 of 6 categories
CZWI leads 1 • JJSF leads 1 • RMCF leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWFL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JJSF is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 52.4x RMCF's $30M. NWFL is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RMCF's -13.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $136M | $90M | $30M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $160M | $37M | $9M | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $28M | $14M | -$4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $90M | $30M | $11M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +63.6% | +54.7% | +21.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +26.1% | +7.0% | -10.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +20.4% | +16.0% | -13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +21.2% | +11.5% | -7.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.2% | — | — | -4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -64.6% | +152.6% | +63.0% | +81.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NWFL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.1x trailing earnings, NWFL trades at a 55% valuation discount to JJSF's 22.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JJSF offers better value at 0.79x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $283M | $203M | $20M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $313M | $136M | $26M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.53x | 10.12x | 14.44x | -2.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.53x | 8.89x | 11.78x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.79x | 1.31x | 2.85x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.50x | 8.56x | 15.28x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.91x | 2.08x | 2.25x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.53x | 1.16x | 1.09x | 2.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.50x | 9.79x | 19.55x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NWFL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NWFL delivers a 12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-67 for RMCF. JJSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RMCF's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWFL scores 7/9 vs RMCF's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +12.0% | +7.8% | -67.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +1.2% | +0.8% | -19.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +7.3% | +2.0% | -35.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | +11.8% | +0.6% | -44.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.31x | 0.28x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $58M | $30M | -$67M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $106M | $44M | $119M | $720,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $164M | $74M | $52M | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 50.00x | 0.74x | 0.16x | -3.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,233 for RMCF. Over the past 12 months, RMCF leads with a +103.2% total return vs JJSF's -30.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs RMCF's -22.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.5% | +11.8% | +21.5% | +31.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.6% | +23.9% | +45.6% | +103.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.1% | +33.0% | +160.0% | -53.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.4% | +45.8% | +71.2% | -57.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.2% | +120.6% | +157.0% | -56.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.6% | +10.0% | +37.5% | -22.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JJSF and NWFL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JJSF is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RMCF's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NWFL currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs JJSF's 58.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.15x | 0.72x | 0.46x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $129.24 | $32.23 | $22.62 | $2.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $73.75 | $23.70 | $12.83 | $1.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.6% | +95.2% | +93.2% | +84.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.2 | 50.6 | 63.7 | 65.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 254K | 21K | 40K | 32K |
Analyst Outlook
JJSF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JJSF as "Buy", NWFL as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy". For income investors, JJSF offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $33.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 1 | 2 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +4.1% | +1.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 21 | 9 | 7 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.11 | $1.25 | $0.37 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +0.1% | +3.1% | 0.0% |
NWFL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
JJSF vs NWFL vs CZWI vs RMCF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JJSF or NWFL or CZWI or RMCF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is the stronger pick with 34. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JJSF or NWFL or CZWI or RMCF?
On trailing P/E, Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is the cheapest at 10. 1x versus J&J Snack Foods Corp. at 22. 5x. On forward P/E, Norwood Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: J&J Snack Foods Corp. wins at 0. 62x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JJSF or NWFL or CZWI or RMCF?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to -57. 7% for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. (RMCF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +157. 0% versus RMCF's -56. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JJSF or NWFL or CZWI or RMCF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), J&J Snack Foods Corp.
(JJSF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning RMCF is approximately 620% more volatile than JJSF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 103% for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JJSF or NWFL or CZWI or RMCF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is pulling ahead at 34. 2% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Norwood Financial Corp. grew EPS 152. 5% year-over-year, compared to -30. 3% for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JJSF leads at 4. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JJSF or NWFL or CZWI or RMCF?
Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -20. 7% for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NWFL leads at 26. 1% versus -20. 1% for RMCF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWFL leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JJSF or NWFL or CZWI or RMCF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, J&J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 17. 5x for J&J Snack Foods Corp. — 8. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — JJSF or NWFL or CZWI or RMCF?
In this comparison, JJSF (4.
1% yield), NWFL (4. 1% yield), CZWI (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. RMCF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JJSF or NWFL or CZWI or RMCF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, J&J Snack Foods Corp.
(JJSF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 4. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JJSF: -5. 2%, RMCF: -56. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JJSF and NWFL and CZWI and RMCF?
These companies operate in different sectors (JJSF (Consumer Defensive) and NWFL (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and RMCF (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JJSF is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NWFL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; RMCF is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JJSF, NWFL, CZWI pay a dividend while RMCF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.