Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
JKHY vs NTRS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
JKHY vs NTRS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $10.34B | $30.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.46B | $14.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $507M | $1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 43.8% | 56.5% |
| Operating Margin | 25.9% | 16.3% |
| Forward P/E | 21.3x | 15.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $16.43B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $102M | $61.13B |
JKHY vs NTRS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 79.0 | -21.0% |
| Northern Trust Corp… (NTRS) | 100 | 206.7 | +106.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JKHY vs NTRS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JKHY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 1.6%
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, current ratio 1.27x
NTRS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 173.7% 10Y total return vs JKHY's 92.3%
- PEG 1.53 vs JKHY's 2.11
- Lower P/E (15.1x vs 21.3x), PEG 1.53 vs 2.11
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.2% revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.1x vs 21.3x), PEG 1.53 vs 2.11 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs NTRS's 12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs NTRS's 1.14 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, 32-year raise streak, vs NTRS's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +71.8% vs JKHY's -15.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.8% ROA vs NTRS's 1.0%, ROIC 21.0% vs 6.0% |
JKHY vs NTRS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JKHY vs NTRS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JKHY leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTRS is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.3B annually — 5.8x JKHY's $2.5B. JKHY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTRS's 12.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $14.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $845M | $3.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $507M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $654M | $4.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +56.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.9% | +16.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | +12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.5% | +38.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.4% | +7.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NTRS leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.7x trailing earnings, NTRS trades at a 18% valuation discount to JKHY's 22.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTRS offers better value at 1.89x vs JKHY's 2.27x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.3B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.2B | -$14.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.90x | 18.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.32x | 15.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.27x | 1.89x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.24x | -4.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.35x | 2.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.90x | 2.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.58x | 5.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 23.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $13 for NTRS.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.8% | +13.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.8% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.0% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.7% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$102M | -$44.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $102M | $61.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $16.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 96.67x | 0.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTRS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTRS five years ago would be worth $14,998 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,682 for JKHY. Over the past 12 months, NTRS leads with a +71.8% total return vs JKHY's -15.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRS at 33.2% vs JKHY's -1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.5% | +17.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.6% | +71.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.0% | +136.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.2% | +50.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.3% | +173.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.0% | +33.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JKHY and NTRS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTRS's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTRS currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs JKHY's 73.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.28x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $193.39 | $173.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $141.81 | $96.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.9% | +94.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.9 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 900K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JKHY and NTRS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates JKHY as "Buy" and NTRS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for JKHY (target: $204) vs -5.8% for NTRS (target: $154). For income investors, NTRS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.92% vs JKHY's 1.58%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $203.75 | $153.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 32 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.25 | $3.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +4.2% |
JKHY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NTRS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
JKHY vs NTRS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JKHY or NTRS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) offers the better valuation at 18. 7x trailing P/E (15. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JKHY or NTRS?
On trailing P/E, Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) is the cheapest at 18.
7x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. at 22. 9x. On forward P/E, Northern Trust Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northern Trust Corporation wins at 1. 53x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 11x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JKHY or NTRS?
Over the past 5 years, Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) delivered a total return of +50.
0%, compared to -3. 2% for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTRS returned +173. 7% versus JKHY's +92. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JKHY or NTRS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Northern Trust Corporation's 1. 14β — meaning NTRS is approximately 303% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — JKHY or NTRS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. grew EPS 19. 3% year-over-year, compared to -10. 5% for Northern Trust Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JKHY or NTRS?
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 2% net margin versus 12. 1% for Northern Trust Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JKHY leads at 23. 9% versus 16. 3% for NTRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTRS leads at 56. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JKHY or NTRS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 11x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) trades at 15. 1x forward P/E versus 21. 3x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JKHY: 42. 6% to $203. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — JKHY or NTRS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) offers the highest yield at 1. 9%, versus 1. 6% for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY).
09Is JKHY or NTRS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +92. 3%, NTRS: +173. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JKHY and NTRS?
These companies operate in different sectors (JKHY (Technology) and NTRS (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.