Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

JL vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
JL
J-Long Group Limited

Apparel - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-95.0%
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.

Construction Materials

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$340K
5Y Perf.-99.6%
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$204M
5Y Perf.+39.2%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-10.0%
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.35B
5Y Perf.+0.1%

JL vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
JL logoJL
RETO logoRETO
PESI logoPESI
CLPS logoCLPS
CWST logoCWST
IndustryApparel - ManufacturersConstruction MaterialsWaste ManagementInformation Technology ServicesWaste Management
Market Cap$25M$340K$204M$25M$5.35B
Revenue (TTM)$34M$9M$59M$299M$1.88B
Net Income (TTM)$3M$-25M$-18M$-4M$7M
Gross Margin23.8%14.0%4.1%22.8%17.4%
Operating Margin5.4%-237.8%-26.3%-1.4%4.5%
Forward P/E8.0x62.7x
Total Debt$2M$110K$4M$34M$1.24B
Cash & Equiv.$11M$671K$12M$28M$124M

JL vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWSTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

JL
RETO
PESI
CLPS
CWST
StockJan 24May 26Return
J-Long Group Limited (JL)1005.0-95.0%
ReTo Eco-Solutions,… (RETO)1000.4-99.6%
Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI)100139.2+39.2%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)10090.0-10.0%
Casella Waste Syste… (CWST)100100.1+0.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: JL vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JL leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. CLPS Incorporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
JL
J-Long Group Limited
The Growth Play

JL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 37.7%, EPS growth 219.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 99.5%
  • 37.7% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5%
  • Lower P/E (8.0x vs 62.7x)
  • 9.1% margin vs RETO's -291.9%
Best for: growth exposure
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
The Basic Materials Pick

RETO plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: basic materials exposure
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
The Industrials Pick

PESI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 14.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.58x
  • Beta 0.19, yield 14.7%, current ratio 1.58x
  • Beta 0.19 vs RETO's 1.75
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CWST is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 10.6% 10Y total return vs PESI's 174.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJL logoJL37.7% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5%
ValueJL logoJLLower P/E (8.0x vs 62.7x)
Quality / MarginsJL logoJL9.1% margin vs RETO's -291.9%
Stability / SafetyCLPS logoCLPSBeta 0.19 vs RETO's 1.75
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS14.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs JL's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)JL logoJL+87.6% vs RETO's -96.3%
Efficiency (ROA)JL logoJL18.3% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC 24.1% vs -14.5%

JL vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

JLJ-Long Group Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

RETOReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
FY 2024
Technology Equipment
100.0%$652,906
PESIPerma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Segments Total
50.0%$62M
Treatment
36.6%$45M
Services
13.4%$17M
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598
CWSTCasella Waste Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Collection
74.3%$1.2B
Processing Services
8.9%$144M
Transfer
8.8%$143M
Landfill Revenue
6.1%$98M
Transportation
1.4%$23M
Landfill - Gas To Energy
0.5%$8M

JL vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJLLAGGINGCWST

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CWST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 216.8x RETO's $9M. JL is the more profitable business, keeping 9.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RETO's -2.9%. On growth, RETO holds the edge at +49.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricJL logoJLJ-Long Group Limi…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$34M$9M$59M$299M$1.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2M-$19M-$14M-$1M$414M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$3M-$25M-$18M-$4M$7M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$1M-$7M-$13M$0$102M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+23.8%+14.0%+4.1%+22.8%+17.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.4%-2.4%-26.3%-1.4%+4.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.1%-2.9%-30.1%-1.3%+0.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.5%-77.8%-22.0%-2.3%+5.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-13.2%+49.0%-20.1%+15.3%+9.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-102.4%+98.8%-110.5%+75.8%-18.6%
JL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JL leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 8.0x trailing earnings, JL trades at a 99% valuation discount to CWST's 712.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JL's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CWST's 15.7x.

MetricJL logoJLJ-Long Group Limi…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Market CapShares × price$25M$340,425$204M$25M$5.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$17M-$221,330$197M$31M$6.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS8.05x-0.04x-14.67x-3.46x712.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.62.70x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.44x15.74x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.64x0.19x3.31x0.15x2.91x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.39x0.01x4.05x0.43x3.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.05x63.16x
JL leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

JL delivers a 30.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-183 for RETO. RETO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWST's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JL scores 7/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricJL logoJLJ-Long Group Limi…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+30.5%-183.4%-34.5%-6.1%+0.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+18.3%-75.1%-20.2%-3.2%+0.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+24.1%-14.5%-21.7%-7.9%+2.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+17.2%-21.6%-16.7%-9.8%+2.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975524
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.16x0.00x0.09x0.59x0.79x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$8M-$561,755-$7M$6M$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$11M$671,355$12M$28M$124M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$109,600$4M$34M$1.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense196.53x-31.78x-42.14x1.12x
JL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PESI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,667 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for RETO. Over the past 12 months, JL leads with a +87.6% total return vs RETO's -96.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PESI at 6.2% vs RETO's -92.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricJL logoJLJ-Long Group Limi…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.2%-67.5%-10.2%-10.9%-13.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+87.6%-96.3%+15.8%-9.4%-27.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.5%-100.0%+19.8%+0.0%-6.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.5%-100.0%+46.7%-69.2%+26.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.5%-100.0%+174.4%-78.6%+1059.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-51.3%-92.1%+6.2%+0.0%-2.2%
PESI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — JL and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RETO's 1.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JL currently trades 81.3% from its 52-week high vs RETO's 3.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricJL logoJLJ-Long Group Limi…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.51x1.75x1.74x0.19x0.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$8.22$19.55$16.50$1.88$121.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.50$0.48$8.02$0.80$74.05
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+81.3%+3.2%+66.7%+47.9%+70.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.043.435.746.854.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded26K911K164K15K849K
Evenly matched — JL and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PESI as "Hold", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.6% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 31.5% for CWST (target: $112). For income investors, CLPS offers the higher dividend yield at 14.69% vs JL's 1.91%.

MetricJL logoJLJ-Long Group Limi…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.00$112.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts119
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%+14.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0131
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.13$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

JL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PESI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallJ-Long Group Limited (JL)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

JL vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is JL or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST a better buy right now?

For growth investors, J-Long Group Limited (JL) is the stronger pick with 37.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). J-Long Group Limited (JL) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — JL or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

On trailing P/E, J-Long Group Limited (JL) is the cheapest at 8.

0x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — JL or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.

(PESI) delivered a total return of +46. 7%, compared to -100. 0% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus RETO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — JL or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

19β versus ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 75β — meaning RETO is approximately 800% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 79% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — JL or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), J-Long Group Limited (JL) is pulling ahead at 37.

7% versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: J-Long Group Limited grew EPS 219. 2% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, JL leads at 99. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — JL or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

J-Long Group Limited (JL) is the more profitable company, earning 6.

6% net margin versus -456. 7% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JL leads at 6. 1% versus -225. 9% for RETO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RETO leads at 45. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is JL or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 63.

6% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — JL or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

7% yield), JL (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. RETO, PESI, CWST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is JL or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), +1059% 10Y return). ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a higher beta of 1. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, RETO: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between JL and RETO and PESI and CLPS and CWST?

These companies operate in different sectors (JL (Consumer Cyclical) and RETO (Basic Materials) and PESI (Industrials) and CLPS (Technology) and CWST (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: JL is a small-cap high-growth stock; RETO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock. JL, CLPS pay a dividend while RETO, PESI, CWST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

JL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RETO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PESI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CWST

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform JL and RETO and PESI and CLPS and CWST on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(JL: -13.2% · RETO: 49.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.