Real Estate - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JOE vs FCPT vs PINE vs JBGS vs FOR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Office
Real Estate - Development
JOE vs FCPT vs PINE vs JBGS vs FOR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Office | Real Estate - Development |
| Market Cap | $3.73B | $2.80B | $281M | $912M | $1.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $518M | $301M | $65M | $506M | $1.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $112M | $117M | $-415K | $-112M | $167M |
| Gross Margin | 92.6% | 98.0% | -4.1% | -10.2% | 21.3% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | 56.0% | 28.0% | -0.5% | 12.3% |
| Forward P/E | 260.2x | 21.8x | 59.3x | — | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $394M | $1.21B | $394M | $2.54B | $817M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $130M | $12M | $5M | $75M | $379M |
JOE vs FCPT vs PINE vs JBGS vs FOR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The St. Joe Company (JOE) | 100 | 337.9 | +237.9% |
| Four Corners Proper… (FCPT) | 100 | 117.8 | +17.8% |
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 100 | 158.8 | +58.8% |
| JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) | 100 | 52.0 | -48.0% |
| Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) | 100 | 179.7 | +79.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JOE vs FCPT vs PINE vs JBGS vs FOR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JOE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 27.5%, EPS growth 57.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.7%
- 301.3% 10Y total return vs FOR's 118.1%
- 27.5% FFO/revenue growth vs JBGS's -8.9%
- +49.9% vs FCPT's -3.0%
FCPT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 5.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 74.2%, current ratio 0.30x
- Beta 0.14, yield 5.5%, current ratio 0.30x
- 38.7% margin vs JBGS's -22.2%
PINE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, JBGS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FOR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.44 vs JOE's 12.37
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.5% FFO/revenue growth vs JBGS's -8.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.7% margin vs JBGS's -22.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs FOR's 1.14 | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs JOE's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.9% vs FCPT's -3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.3% ROA vs JBGS's -2.5%, ROIC 9.3% vs -0.1% |
JOE vs FCPT vs PINE vs JBGS vs FOR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JOE vs FCPT vs PINE vs JBGS vs FOR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FCPT leads in 2 of 6 categories
JOE leads 2 • FOR leads 1 • PINE leads 0 • JBGS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FOR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 26.4x PINE's $65M. FCPT is the more profitable business, keeping 38.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JBGS's -22.2%. On growth, PINE holds the edge at +29.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $518M | $301M | $65M | $506M | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $194M | $231M | $45M | $129M | $213M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $112M | $117M | -$415,000 | -$112M | $167M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $201M | $188M | -$46M | $93M | $266M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.6% | +98.0% | -4.1% | -10.2% | +21.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +56.0% | +28.0% | -0.5% | +12.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.6% | +38.7% | -0.6% | -22.2% | +9.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.8% | +62.5% | -71.7% | +18.3% | +15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.1% | +9.4% | +29.6% | +5.7% | +6.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.0% | +7.7% | +185.7% | +42.9% | +1.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FOR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, FOR trades at a 75% valuation discount to JOE's 32.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FOR offers better value at 0.39x vs FCPT's 118.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.7B | $2.8B | $281M | $912M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $4.0B | $671M | $3.4B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.52x | 23.37x | -89.27x | -7.40x | 8.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 260.20x | 21.81x | 59.32x | — | 9.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.55x | 118.24x | — | — | 0.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.64x | 17.81x | 14.63x | 18.41x | 8.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.28x | 9.51x | 4.65x | 1.83x | 0.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.83x | 1.61x | 1.01x | 0.62x | 0.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.01x | 14.54x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
JOE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JOE delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-6 for JBGS. FOR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JBGS's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JOE scores 9/9 vs FOR's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.6% | +7.4% | -0.1% | -6.5% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | +4.1% | -0.1% | -2.5% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.3% | +4.5% | +2.2% | -0.1% | +7.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | +6.0% | +2.8% | -0.1% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.74x | 1.31x | 1.52x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $264M | $1.2B | $390M | $2.5B | $438M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $130M | $12M | $5M | $75M | $379M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $394M | $1.2B | $394M | $2.5B | $817M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.01x | 3.17x | 0.82x | -0.13x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JOE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JOE five years ago would be worth $14,290 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,067 for JBGS. Over the past 12 months, JOE leads with a +49.9% total return vs FCPT's -3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JOE at 16.8% vs FCPT's 4.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.0% | +11.2% | +18.8% | -7.4% | +12.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.9% | -3.0% | +37.3% | +5.4% | +39.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.3% | +14.0% | +46.6% | +23.2% | +37.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.9% | +17.2% | +41.2% | -39.3% | +8.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +301.3% | +99.1% | +38.3% | -28.5% | +118.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.8% | +4.5% | +13.6% | +7.2% | +11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FCPT and PINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FCPT is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FOR's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PINE currently trades 94.4% from its 52-week high vs JBGS's 63.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 0.14x | 0.33x | 0.63x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $73.54 | $28.14 | $20.80 | $24.30 | $30.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $42.65 | $22.78 | $13.10 | $14.03 | $18.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.5% | +90.5% | +94.4% | +63.6% | +88.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 55.6 | 54.0 | 58.6 | 52.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 257K | 658K | 176K | 599K | 134K |
Analyst Outlook
FCPT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JOE as "Hold", FCPT as "Hold", PINE as "Buy", JBGS as "Hold", FOR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.4% upside for JBGS (target: $18) vs 4.1% for FOR (target: $28). For income investors, FCPT offers the higher dividend yield at 5.49% vs PINE's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $20.75 | $18.00 | $28.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 15 | 12 | 6 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +5.5% | +0.2% | +4.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.58 | $1.40 | $0.04 | $0.72 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | 0.0% | +3.1% | +48.6% | +0.1% |
FCPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). JOE leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
JOE vs FCPT vs PINE vs JBGS vs FOR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JOE or FCPT or PINE or JBGS or FOR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The St.
Joe Company (JOE) is the stronger pick with 27. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 9% for JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS). Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (9. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JOE or FCPT or PINE or JBGS or FOR?
On trailing P/E, Forestar Group Inc.
(FOR) is the cheapest at 8. 3x versus The St. Joe Company at 32. 5x. On forward P/E, Forestar Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Forestar Group Inc. wins at 0. 44x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 118. 24x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JOE or FCPT or PINE or JBGS or FOR?
Over the past 5 years, The St.
Joe Company (JOE) delivered a total return of +42. 9%, compared to -39. 3% for JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JOE returned +301. 3% versus JBGS's -28. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JOE or FCPT or PINE or JBGS or FOR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Forestar Group Inc. 's 1. 14β — meaning FOR is approximately 699% more volatile than FCPT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 152% for JBG SMITH Properties — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JOE or FCPT or PINE or JBGS or FOR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The St.
Joe Company (JOE) is pulling ahead at 27. 5% versus -8. 9% for JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The St. Joe Company grew EPS 57. 5% year-over-year, compared to -257. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JOE leads at 26. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JOE or FCPT or PINE or JBGS or FOR?
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 2% net margin versus -27. 9% for JBG SMITH Properties — meaning it keeps 38. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCPT leads at 55. 7% versus -1. 3% for JBGS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCPT leads at 95. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JOE or FCPT or PINE or JBGS or FOR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 44x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 118. 24x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 260. 2x for The St. Joe Company — 251. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JBGS: 16. 4% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JOE or FCPT or PINE or JBGS or FOR?
In this comparison, FCPT (5.
5% yield), JBGS (4. 7% yield), JOE (0. 9% yield), PINE (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. FOR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JOE or FCPT or PINE or JBGS or FOR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 5. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCPT: +99. 1%, FOR: +118. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JOE and FCPT and PINE and JBGS and FOR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JOE is a small-cap high-growth stock; FCPT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PINE is a small-cap high-growth stock; JBGS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FOR is a small-cap deep-value stock. JOE, FCPT, JBGS pay a dividend while PINE, FOR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.