Real Estate - Diversified
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
JOE vs JBGS vs UDR vs CLPR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
JOE vs JBGS vs UDR vs CLPR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Diversified | REIT - Office | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $3.73B | $912M | $12.04B | $50M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $518M | $506M | $1.72B | $153M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $112M | $-112M | $491M | $-20M |
| Gross Margin | 92.6% | -10.2% | 46.0% | 80.2% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | -0.5% | 27.4% | 2.7% |
| Forward P/E | 260.2x | — | 66.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $394M | $2.54B | $6.19B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $130M | $75M | $37M | $31M |
JOE vs JBGS vs UDR vs CLPR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The St. Joe Company (JOE) | 100 | 337.9 | +237.9% |
| JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) | 100 | 52.0 | -48.0% |
| UDR, Inc. (UDR) | 100 | 99.9 | -0.1% |
| Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR) | 100 | 42.3 | -57.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JOE vs JBGS vs UDR vs CLPR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JOE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 27.5%, EPS growth 57.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.7%
- 301.3% 10Y total return vs UDR's 38.8%
- 27.5% FFO/revenue growth vs JBGS's -8.9%
- +49.9% vs CLPR's -14.2%
JBGS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
UDR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 4.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, current ratio 3.31x
- PEG 1.60 vs JOE's 12.37
- Beta 0.39, yield 4.6%, current ratio 3.31x
CLPR is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 13.9% yield, vs UDR's 4.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.5% FFO/revenue growth vs JBGS's -8.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.6% margin vs JBGS's -22.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs CLPR's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 13.9% yield, vs UDR's 4.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.9% vs CLPR's -14.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.3% ROA vs JBGS's -2.5%, ROIC 9.3% vs -0.1% |
JOE vs JBGS vs UDR vs CLPR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JOE vs JBGS vs UDR vs CLPR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JOE leads in 2 of 6 categories
UDR leads 1 • CLPR leads 1 • JBGS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UDR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UDR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 11.2x CLPR's $153M. UDR is the more profitable business, keeping 28.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JBGS's -22.2%. On growth, JBGS holds the edge at +5.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $518M | $506M | $1.7B | $153M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $194M | $129M | $1.1B | $36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $112M | -$112M | $491M | -$20M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $201M | $93M | $892M | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.6% | -10.2% | +46.0% | +80.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | -0.5% | +27.4% | +2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.6% | -22.2% | +28.6% | -13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.8% | +18.3% | +52.0% | +4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.1% | +5.7% | +0.9% | -2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.0% | +42.9% | +147.8% | -5.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CLPR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 32.5x trailing earnings, JOE trades at a 1% valuation discount to UDR's 32.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UDR offers better value at 0.79x vs JOE's 1.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.7B | $912M | $12.0B | $50M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $3.4B | $18.2B | $20M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.52x | -7.40x | 32.69x | -6.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 260.20x | — | 66.06x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.55x | — | 0.79x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.64x | 18.41x | 18.15x | 0.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.28x | 1.83x | 7.03x | 0.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.83x | 0.62x | 2.95x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.01x | — | 19.61x | 2.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JOE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JOE delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-6 for JBGS. JOE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JBGS's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JOE scores 9/9 vs CLPR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.6% | -6.5% | +12.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | -2.5% | +4.7% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.3% | -0.1% | +2.3% | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | -0.1% | +3.1% | +0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 4 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 1.52x | 1.49x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $264M | $2.5B | $6.2B | -$31M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $130M | $75M | $37M | $31M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $394M | $2.5B | $6.2B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.01x | -0.13x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JOE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JOE five years ago would be worth $14,290 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,757 for CLPR. Over the past 12 months, JOE leads with a +49.9% total return vs CLPR's -14.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JOE at 16.8% vs CLPR's -8.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.0% | -7.4% | +3.0% | -9.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.9% | +5.4% | -9.5% | -14.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.3% | +23.2% | +1.9% | -23.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.9% | -39.3% | -2.6% | -42.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +301.3% | -28.5% | +38.8% | -50.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.8% | +7.2% | +0.6% | -8.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JOE and UDR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UDR is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLPR's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JOE currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs JBGS's 63.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 0.63x | 0.39x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $73.54 | $24.30 | $43.12 | $4.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $42.65 | $14.03 | $32.94 | $2.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.5% | +63.6% | +85.7% | +67.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 58.6 | 64.9 | 42.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 257K | 599K | 3.2M | 70K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — UDR and CLPR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JOE as "Hold", JBGS as "Hold", UDR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.4% upside for JBGS (target: $18) vs 9.0% for UDR (target: $40). For income investors, CLPR offers the higher dividend yield at 13.93% vs JOE's 0.90%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $40.25 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 6 | 38 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +4.7% | +4.6% | +13.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 1 | 15 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.58 | $0.72 | $1.72 | $0.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +48.6% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
JOE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). UDR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
JOE vs JBGS vs UDR vs CLPR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JOE or JBGS or UDR or CLPR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The St.
Joe Company (JOE) is the stronger pick with 27. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 9% for JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS). The St. Joe Company (JOE) offers the better valuation at 32. 5x trailing P/E (260. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UDR, Inc. (UDR) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JOE or JBGS or UDR or CLPR?
On trailing P/E, The St.
Joe Company (JOE) is the cheapest at 32. 5x versus UDR, Inc. at 32. 7x. On forward P/E, UDR, Inc. is actually cheaper at 66. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: UDR, Inc. wins at 1. 60x versus The St. Joe Company's 12. 37x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JOE or JBGS or UDR or CLPR?
Over the past 5 years, The St.
Joe Company (JOE) delivered a total return of +42. 9%, compared to -42. 4% for Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JOE returned +301. 3% versus CLPR's -50. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JOE or JBGS or UDR or CLPR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), UDR, Inc.
(UDR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Clipper Realty Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning CLPR is approximately 145% more volatile than UDR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The St. Joe Company (JOE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 152% for JBG SMITH Properties — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JOE or JBGS or UDR or CLPR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The St.
Joe Company (JOE) is pulling ahead at 27. 5% versus -8. 9% for JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UDR, Inc. grew EPS 334. 6% year-over-year, compared to -88. 0% for Clipper Realty Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JOE leads at 26. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JOE or JBGS or UDR or CLPR?
The St.
Joe Company (JOE) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 5% net margin versus -27. 9% for JBG SMITH Properties — meaning it keeps 22. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JOE leads at 28. 5% versus -1. 3% for JBGS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JOE leads at 93. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JOE or JBGS or UDR or CLPR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, UDR, Inc. (UDR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 60x versus The St. Joe Company's 12. 37x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, UDR, Inc. (UDR) trades at 66. 1x forward P/E versus 260. 2x for The St. Joe Company — 194. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JBGS: 16. 4% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JOE or JBGS or UDR or CLPR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR) offers the highest yield at 13. 9%, versus 0. 9% for The St. Joe Company (JOE).
09Is JOE or JBGS or UDR or CLPR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, UDR, Inc.
(UDR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 4. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UDR: +38. 8%, CLPR: -50. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JOE and JBGS and UDR and CLPR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JOE is a small-cap high-growth stock; JBGS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; UDR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CLPR is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.