Travel Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
JXG vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
JXG vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Travel Services | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $928K | $8M | $19.73B | $25M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $50M | $115M | $127M | $299M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-53M | $-289M | $-4M |
| Gross Margin | 16.8% | 64.3% | 25.8% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | -44.2% | -68.3% | -1.4% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $46M | $24M | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $847K | $87M | $28M |
JXG vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| JX Luxventure Limit… (JXG) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 170.9 | +70.9% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 80.9 | -19.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JXG vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JXG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 7.9%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 0.15, current ratio 1.32x
- 56.5% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3%
- 6.2% margin vs BBAI's -226.7%
AIXI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 52.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
BBAI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- -57.6% 10Y total return vs CLPS's -78.5%
- +36.7% vs JXG's -89.3%
CLPS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.5% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.2% margin vs BBAI's -226.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs BBAI's 3.31 | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.7% vs JXG's -89.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.4% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 16.1% vs -34.4% |
JXG vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JXG vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JXG leads in 3 of 6 categories
BBAI leads 1 • CLPS leads 1 • AIXI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JXG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 6.0x JXG's $50M. JXG is the more profitable business, keeping 6.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBAI's -2.3%. On growth, JXG holds the edge at +110.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $50M | $115M | $127M | $299M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | -$49M | -$75M | -$1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$53M | -$289M | -$4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | -$2M | -$56M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +64.3% | +25.8% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | -44.2% | -68.3% | -1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | -45.9% | -2.3% | -1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | -2.0% | -44.3% | -2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +110.1% | -64.9% | -0.9% | +15.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -90.3% | -29.9% | +52.0% | +75.8% |
Valuation Metrics
JXG leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $927,853 | $8M | $19.7B | $25M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $53M | $19.7B | $31M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.30x | -0.45x | -5.09x | -3.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.20x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 0.11x | 154.51x | 0.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.04x | — | 24.45x | 0.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.13x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
JXG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JXG delivers a 14.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-51 for BBAI. BBAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JXG scores 5/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.7% | — | -50.7% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.4% | -65.3% | -35.3% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.1% | -34.4% | -19.5% | -7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.5% | -3.4% | -19.6% | -9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | — | 0.04x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $471,477 | $45M | -$63M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $846,593 | $87M | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $46M | $24M | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 295.25x | -14.13x | -18.17x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BBAI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BBAI five years ago would be worth $4,308 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20 for JXG. Over the past 12 months, BBAI leads with a +36.7% total return vs JXG's -89.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BBAI at 14.3% vs JXG's -76.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.1% | +68.1% | -28.6% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.3% | -79.2% | +36.7% | -5.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -98.6% | +49.5% | +0.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -98.6% | -56.9% | -69.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -98.6% | -57.6% | -78.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -76.4% | -75.9% | +14.3% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JXG and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JXG is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLPS currently trades 48.2% from its 52-week high vs JXG's 9.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.15x | 0.94x | 3.31x | 0.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.70 | $4.02 | $9.39 | $1.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.01 | $0.08 | $2.96 | $0.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.4% | +18.0% | +44.4% | +48.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.8 | 49.3 | 63.3 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 60.6M | 34.6M | 15K |
Analyst Outlook
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $6.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 4 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +14.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
JXG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BBAI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
JXG vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JXG or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JX Luxventure Limited (JXG) is the stronger pick with 56.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). JX Luxventure Limited (JXG) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — JXG or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS?
Over the past 5 years, BigBear.
ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) delivered a total return of -56. 9%, compared to -99. 8% for JX Luxventure Limited (JXG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BBAI returned -57. 6% versus JXG's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — JXG or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JX Luxventure Limited (JXG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
15β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning BBAI is approximately 2040% more volatile than JXG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — JXG or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JX Luxventure Limited (JXG) is pulling ahead at 56.
5% versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xiao-I Corporation grew EPS 52. 7% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — JXG or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS?
JX Luxventure Limited (JXG) is the more profitable company, earning 6.
2% net margin versus -230. 2% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JXG leads at 7. 8% versus -65. 3% for BBAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIXI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — JXG or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield) pays a dividend. JXG, AIXI, BBAI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is JXG or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27), 14. 6% yield). BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a higher beta of 3. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, BBAI: -57. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between JXG and AIXI and BBAI and CLPS?
These companies operate in different sectors (JXG (Consumer Cyclical) and AIXI (Technology) and BBAI (Technology) and CLPS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JXG is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while JXG, AIXI, BBAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.