Travel Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JXG vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
JXG vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Travel Services | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $928K | $8M | $19.73B | $25M | $3.13T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $50M | $115M | $127M | $299M | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-53M | $-289M | $-4M | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 16.8% | 64.3% | 25.8% | 22.8% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | -44.2% | -68.3% | -1.4% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | — | — | — | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $46M | $24M | $34M | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $847K | $87M | $28M | $30.24B |
JXG vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| JX Luxventure Limit… (JXG) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 170.9 | +70.9% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 80.9 | -19.1% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 146.0 | +46.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JXG vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JXG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 7.9%, current ratio 1.32x
- 56.5% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3%
- Lower P/E (0.3x vs 25.3x)
- Beta 0.15 vs BBAI's 3.31
AIXI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 52.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
BBAI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +36.7% vs JXG's -89.3%
CLPS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- Beta 0.27, yield 14.6%, current ratio 1.58x
- 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MSFT's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
MSFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs BBAI's -57.6%
- 39.3% margin vs BBAI's -226.7%
- 19.2% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 24.9% vs -34.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.5% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs BBAI's -226.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs BBAI's 3.31 | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MSFT's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.7% vs JXG's -89.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.2% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 24.9% vs -34.4% |
JXG vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JXG vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories
JXG leads 1 • BBAI leads 1 • AIXI leads 0 • CLPS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 6385.9x JXG's $50M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBAI's -2.3%. On growth, JXG holds the edge at +110.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $50M | $115M | $127M | $299M | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | -$49M | -$75M | -$1M | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$53M | -$289M | -$4M | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | -$2M | -$56M | $0 | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +64.3% | +25.8% | +22.8% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | -44.2% | -68.3% | -1.4% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | -45.9% | -2.3% | -1.3% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | -2.0% | -44.3% | -2.3% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +110.1% | -64.9% | -0.9% | +15.3% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -90.3% | -29.9% | +52.0% | +75.8% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
JXG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, JXG trades at a 99% valuation discount to MSFT's 30.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JXG's 0.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MSFT's 19.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $927,853 | $8M | $19.7B | $25M | $3.13T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $53M | $19.7B | $31M | $3.21T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.30x | -0.45x | -5.09x | -3.48x | 30.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 25.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.20x | — | — | — | 19.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 0.11x | 154.51x | 0.15x | 11.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.04x | — | 24.45x | 0.43x | 9.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.13x | — | — | — | 43.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-51 for BBAI. BBAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSFT scores 6/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.7% | — | -50.7% | -6.1% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.4% | -65.3% | -35.3% | -3.2% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.1% | -34.4% | -19.5% | -7.9% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.5% | -3.4% | -19.6% | -9.8% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | — | 0.04x | 0.59x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $471,477 | $45M | -$63M | $6M | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $846,593 | $87M | $28M | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $46M | $24M | $34M | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 295.25x | -14.13x | -18.17x | — | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BBAI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth $17,246 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20 for JXG. Over the past 12 months, BBAI leads with a +36.7% total return vs JXG's -89.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BBAI at 14.3% vs JXG's -76.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.1% | +68.1% | -28.6% | -10.3% | -10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.3% | -79.2% | +36.7% | -5.4% | -2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -98.6% | +49.5% | +0.5% | +39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -98.6% | -56.9% | -69.3% | +72.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -98.6% | -57.6% | -78.5% | +787.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -76.4% | -75.9% | +14.3% | +0.2% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JXG and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JXG is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSFT currently trades 75.8% from its 52-week high vs JXG's 9.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.15x | 0.94x | 3.31x | 0.27x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.70 | $4.02 | $9.39 | $1.88 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.01 | $0.08 | $2.96 | $0.80 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.4% | +18.0% | +44.4% | +48.2% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.8 | 49.3 | 63.3 | 49.8 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 60.6M | 34.6M | 15K | 32.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLPS and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BBAI as "Hold", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.9% upside for BBAI (target: $6) vs 31.1% for MSFT (target: $552). For income investors, CLPS offers the higher dividend yield at 14.60% vs MSFT's 0.77%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $6.00 | — | $551.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 4 | — | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +14.6% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 3 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.13 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JXG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
JXG vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JXG or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JX Luxventure Limited (JXG) is the stronger pick with 56.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). JX Luxventure Limited (JXG) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) a "Buy" — based on 81 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JXG or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, JX Luxventure Limited (JXG) is the cheapest at 0.
3x versus Microsoft Corporation at 30. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JXG or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) delivered a total return of +72.
5%, compared to -99. 8% for JX Luxventure Limited (JXG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +787. 7% versus JXG's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JXG or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JX Luxventure Limited (JXG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
15β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning BBAI is approximately 2040% more volatile than JXG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JXG or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JX Luxventure Limited (JXG) is pulling ahead at 56.
5% versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xiao-I Corporation grew EPS 52. 7% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JXG or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -230. 2% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -65. 3% for BBAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSFT leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JXG or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or MSFT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBAI: 43.
9% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JXG or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or MSFT?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield), MSFT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. JXG, AIXI, BBAI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JXG or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a higher beta of 3. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, BBAI: -57. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JXG and AIXI and BBAI and CLPS and MSFT?
These companies operate in different sectors (JXG (Consumer Cyclical) and AIXI (Technology) and BBAI (Technology) and CLPS (Technology) and MSFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JXG is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. CLPS, MSFT pay a dividend while JXG, AIXI, BBAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.