KBH vs TOL

For growth investors, Toll Brothers, Inc.

(TOL) is the stronger pick with 1. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 0% for KB Home (KBH). KB Home (KBH) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KB Home (KBH) a "Hold" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, KB Home (KBH) is the cheapest at 8.

0x versus Toll Brothers, Inc. at 10. 2x. On forward P/E, Toll Brothers, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Toll Brothers, Inc. wins at 0. 34x versus KB Home's 1. 04x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Toll Brothers, Inc.

(TOL) delivered a total return of +109. 0%, compared to +4. 7% for KB Home (KBH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TOL returned +437. 2% versus KBH's +316. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KB Home (KBH) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

00β versus Toll Brothers, Inc. 's 1. 21β — meaning TOL is approximately 21% more volatile than KBH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 44% for KB Home — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Toll Brothers, Inc.

(TOL) is pulling ahead at 1. 1% versus -10. 0% for KB Home (KBH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Toll Brothers, Inc. grew EPS -10. 1% year-over-year, compared to -27. 2% for KB Home. Over a 3-year CAGR, TOL leads at 2. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Toll Brothers, Inc.

(TOL) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus 6. 9% for KB Home — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TOL leads at 15. 7% versus 8. 4% for KBH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TOL leads at 26. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 34x versus KB Home's 1. 04x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for KB Home — 4. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KBH: 27. 2% to $62. 57.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

KB Home (KBH) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 7% for Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL).

For long-horizon retirement investors, KB Home (KBH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

00), 2. 0% yield, +316. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KBH: +316. 4%, TOL: +437. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.