Steel
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KBSX vs CVBF vs FFIN vs WAFD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
KBSX vs CVBF vs FFIN vs WAFD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $56M | $2.78B | $4.61B | $2.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $52M | $643M | $739M | $1.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $209M | $243M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 44.8% | 79.9% | 70.8% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | -0.9% | 43.8% | 36.8% | 20.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.2x | 15.9x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $35M | $991M | $197M | $1.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $108M | $763M | $657M |
KBSX vs CVBF vs FFIN vs WAFD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FST Corp. (KBSX) | 100 | 12.9 | -87.1% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 95.8 | -4.2% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 89.8 | -10.2% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 110.6 | +10.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KBSX vs CVBF vs FFIN vs WAFD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KBSX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 31.4%, EPS growth 66.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.55, current ratio 0.79x
- 31.4% revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3%
CVBF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.
- 32.5% margin vs KBSX's -4.5%
- 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 3.05 vs CVBF's 4.48
- NIM 3.1% vs WAFD's 2.5%
- 1.6% ROA vs KBSX's -3.8%, ROIC 11.0% vs -7.2%
WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 3.0%
- 84.4% 10Y total return vs FFIN's 145.4%
- Better valuation composite
- +28.5% vs KBSX's -36.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.4% revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.5% margin vs KBSX's -4.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs FFIN's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.5% vs KBSX's -36.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs KBSX's -3.8%, ROIC 11.0% vs -7.2% |
KBSX vs CVBF vs FFIN vs WAFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KBSX vs CVBF vs FFIN vs WAFD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WAFD leads in 2 of 6 categories
CVBF leads 1 • FFIN leads 1 • KBSX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAFD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 27.4x KBSX's $52M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KBSX's -4.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $52M | $643M | $739M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $510,674 | $294M | $310M | $277M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $209M | $243M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $217M | $290M | $226M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.8% | +79.9% | +70.8% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +43.8% | +36.8% | +20.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +32.5% | +30.2% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +33.8% | +39.6% | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.0% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +164.1% | +11.1% | -7.7% | +46.3% |
Valuation Metrics
WAFD leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, CVBF trades at a 35% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FFIN offers better value at 3.98x vs WAFD's 4.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $56M | $2.8B | $4.6B | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $84M | $3.7B | $4.0B | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.75x | 13.49x | 20.76x | 13.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.24x | 15.92x | 10.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.25x | 3.98x | 4.41x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.02x | 14.17x | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.16x | 4.33x | 6.23x | 1.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.84x | 1.21x | 2.89x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.81x | 15.73x | 13.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-19 for KBSX. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KBSX's 3.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WAFD scores 7/9 vs KBSX's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.6% | +9.3% | +13.3% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.8% | +1.4% | +1.6% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.2% | +6.8% | +11.0% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.0% | +9.3% | +16.0% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.73x | 0.43x | 0.12x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $28M | $883M | -$566M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $108M | $763M | $657M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $991M | $197M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.69x | 2.12x | 1.48x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WAFD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAFD five years ago would be worth $12,248 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,049 for KBSX. Over the past 12 months, WAFD leads with a +28.5% total return vs KBSX's -36.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVBF at 24.7% vs KBSX's -52.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.8% | +10.9% | +8.5% | +11.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.4% | +13.1% | -3.2% | +28.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +94.0% | +29.1% | +51.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +12.2% | -28.2% | +22.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +67.6% | +145.4% | +84.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.8% | +24.7% | +8.9% | +14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KBSX and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KBSX is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFIN's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs KBSX's 49.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 0.94x | 0.95x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.52 | $21.48 | $38.74 | $36.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.04 | $17.95 | $28.11 | $26.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.2% | +95.5% | +83.6% | +98.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.1 | 57.9 | 58.2 | 68.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 130K | 1.6M | 740K | 661K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVBF and FFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CVBF as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -1.9% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs FFIN's 2.22%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $24.75 | $39.25 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 15 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.0% | +2.2% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 4 | 11 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 | $0.72 | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.9% | 0.0% | +3.7% |
WAFD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). CVBF leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
KBSX vs CVBF vs FFIN vs WAFD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KBSX or CVBF or FFIN or WAFD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FST Corp.
(KBSX) is the stronger pick with 31. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) a "Hold" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KBSX or CVBF or FFIN or WAFD?
On trailing P/E, CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, WaFd, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. wins at 3. 05x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KBSX or CVBF or FFIN or WAFD?
Over the past 5 years, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) delivered a total return of +22. 5%, compared to -89. 5% for FST Corp. (KBSX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FFIN returned +145. 4% versus KBSX's -89. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KBSX or CVBF or FFIN or WAFD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FST Corp.
(KBSX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning FFIN is approximately 73% more volatile than KBSX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 4% for FST Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KBSX or CVBF or FFIN or WAFD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FST Corp.
(KBSX) is pulling ahead at 31. 4% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FST Corp. grew EPS 66. 0% year-over-year, compared to 5. 2% for WaFd, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KBSX or CVBF or FFIN or WAFD?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus -14. 8% for FST Corp. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus -7. 1% for KBSX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KBSX or CVBF or FFIN or WAFD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 05x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — KBSX or CVBF or FFIN or WAFD?
In this comparison, CVBF (4.
0% yield), WAFD (3. 0% yield), FFIN (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. KBSX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KBSX or CVBF or FFIN or WAFD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WAFD: +84. 4%, KBSX: -89. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KBSX and CVBF and FFIN and WAFD?
These companies operate in different sectors (KBSX (Basic Materials) and CVBF (Financial Services) and FFIN (Financial Services) and WAFD (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KBSX is a small-cap high-growth stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock. CVBF, FFIN, WAFD pay a dividend while KBSX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.