Steel
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KBSX vs WAFD vs FFIN vs BANR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
KBSX vs WAFD vs FFIN vs BANR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $56M | $2.73B | $4.61B | $2.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $52M | $1.41B | $739M | $819M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $243M | $243M | $195M |
| Gross Margin | 44.8% | 50.9% | 70.8% | 79.0% |
| Operating Margin | -0.9% | 20.5% | 36.8% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.9x | 15.9x | 10.5x |
| Total Debt | $35M | $1.82B | $197M | $373M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $657M | $763M | $183M |
KBSX vs WAFD vs FFIN vs BANR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FST Corp. (KBSX) | 100 | 12.9 | -87.1% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 110.6 | +10.6% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 89.8 | -10.2% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 98.2 | -1.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KBSX vs WAFD vs FFIN vs BANR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KBSX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 31.4%, EPS growth 66.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, current ratio 0.79x
- 31.4% revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
- Beta 0.55 vs FFIN's 0.95
WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +28.5% vs KBSX's -36.4%
FFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 30.2% margin vs KBSX's -4.5%
- 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs BANR's 3.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 1.6% ROA vs KBSX's -3.8%, ROIC 11.0% vs -7.2%
BANR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 3.0%
- 101.1% 10Y total return vs FFIN's 145.4%
- PEG 0.90 vs WAFD's 3.55
- Beta 0.80, yield 3.0%, current ratio 0.02x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.4% revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.90 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.2% margin vs KBSX's -4.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs FFIN's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs BANR's 3.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.5% vs KBSX's -36.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs KBSX's -3.8%, ROIC 11.0% vs -7.2% |
KBSX vs WAFD vs FFIN vs BANR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KBSX vs WAFD vs FFIN vs BANR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
BANR leads 2 • KBSX leads 0 • WAFD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAFD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 27.4x KBSX's $52M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KBSX's -4.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $52M | $1.4B | $739M | $819M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $510,674 | $277M | $310M | $253M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $243M | $243M | $195M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $226M | $290M | $248M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.8% | +50.9% | +70.8% | +79.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +20.5% | +36.8% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +16.0% | +30.2% | +23.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +14.8% | +39.6% | +30.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.0% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +164.1% | +46.3% | -7.7% | +11.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BANR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, BANR trades at a 44% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANR offers better value at 1.00x vs WAFD's 4.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $56M | $2.7B | $4.6B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $84M | $3.9B | $4.0B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.75x | 13.56x | 20.76x | 11.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.93x | 15.92x | 10.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.41x | 3.98x | 1.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.98x | 14.17x | 9.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.16x | 1.93x | 6.23x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.84x | 0.94x | 2.89x | 1.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.09x | 15.73x | 8.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-19 for KBSX. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KBSX's 3.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WAFD scores 7/9 vs KBSX's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.6% | +8.0% | +13.3% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.8% | +1.0% | +1.6% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.2% | +3.9% | +11.0% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.0% | +5.7% | +16.0% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.73x | 0.60x | 0.12x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $28M | $1.2B | -$566M | $190M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $657M | $763M | $183M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $1.8B | $197M | $373M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.69x | 0.48x | 1.48x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BANR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BANR five years ago would be worth $12,958 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,049 for KBSX. Over the past 12 months, WAFD leads with a +28.5% total return vs KBSX's -36.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BANR at 17.1% vs KBSX's -52.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.8% | +11.9% | +8.5% | +6.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.4% | +28.5% | -3.2% | +9.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +51.6% | +29.1% | +60.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +22.5% | -28.2% | +29.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +84.4% | +145.4% | +101.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.8% | +14.9% | +8.9% | +17.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KBSX and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KBSX is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFIN's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs KBSX's 49.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 0.81x | 0.95x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.52 | $36.12 | $38.74 | $69.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.04 | $26.31 | $28.11 | $57.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.2% | +98.8% | +83.6% | +93.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.1 | 68.3 | 58.2 | 58.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 130K | 661K | 740K | 292K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FFIN and BANR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WAFD as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", BANR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -1.9% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, BANR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.99% vs FFIN's 2.22%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $35.00 | $39.25 | $70.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 15 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.0% | +2.2% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 7 | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.05 | $0.72 | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.7% | 0.0% | +1.6% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BANR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
KBSX vs WAFD vs FFIN vs BANR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KBSX or WAFD or FFIN or BANR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FST Corp.
(KBSX) is the stronger pick with 31. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KBSX or WAFD or FFIN or BANR?
On trailing P/E, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the cheapest at 11.
6x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, Banner Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 90x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KBSX or WAFD or FFIN or BANR?
Over the past 5 years, Banner Corporation (BANR) delivered a total return of +29.
6%, compared to -89. 5% for FST Corp. (KBSX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FFIN returned +145. 4% versus KBSX's -89. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KBSX or WAFD or FFIN or BANR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FST Corp.
(KBSX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning FFIN is approximately 73% more volatile than KBSX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 4% for FST Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KBSX or WAFD or FFIN or BANR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FST Corp.
(KBSX) is pulling ahead at 31. 4% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FST Corp. grew EPS 66. 0% year-over-year, compared to 5. 2% for WaFd, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KBSX or WAFD or FFIN or BANR?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus -14. 8% for FST Corp. — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus -7. 1% for KBSX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BANR leads at 79. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KBSX or WAFD or FFIN or BANR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 90x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Banner Corporation (BANR) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — KBSX or WAFD or FFIN or BANR?
In this comparison, BANR (3.
0% yield), WAFD (3. 0% yield), FFIN (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. KBSX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KBSX or WAFD or FFIN or BANR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80), 3. 0% yield, +101. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANR: +101. 1%, KBSX: -89. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KBSX and WAFD and FFIN and BANR?
These companies operate in different sectors (KBSX (Basic Materials) and WAFD (Financial Services) and FFIN (Financial Services) and BANR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KBSX is a small-cap high-growth stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock. WAFD, FFIN, BANR pay a dividend while KBSX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.