Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KEN vs ICL vs MOS vs AMTD vs NTR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.

Independent Power Producers

UtilitiesNYSE • SG
Market Cap$4.52B
5Y Perf.+333.8%
ICL
ICL Group Ltd

Agricultural Inputs

Basic MaterialsNYSE • IL
Market Cap$7.74B
5Y Perf.+84.1%
MOS
The Mosaic Company

Agricultural Inputs

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.27B
5Y Perf.+83.5%
AMTD
AMTD IDEA Group

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • HK
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.-97.3%
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.

Agricultural Inputs

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$32.89B
5Y Perf.+101.0%

KEN vs ICL vs MOS vs AMTD vs NTR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KEN logoKEN
ICL logoICL
MOS logoMOS
AMTD logoAMTD
NTR logoNTR
IndustryIndependent Power ProducersAgricultural InputsAgricultural InputsAsset ManagementAgricultural Inputs
Market Cap$4.52B$7.74B$7.27B$7M$32.89B
Revenue (TTM)$775M$7.05B$11.68B$54M$26.90B
Net Income (TTM)$495M$369M$1.22B$188M$2.27B
Gross Margin17.1%31.9%16.5%45.2%31.1%
Operating Margin5.0%10.6%9.9%48.2%13.4%
Forward P/E7.6x16.6x15.9x0.3x11.7x
Total Debt$1.28B$2.76B$760M$283M$12.93B
Cash & Equiv.$1.02B$291M$277M$63M$700M

KEN vs ICL vs MOS vs AMTD vs NTRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KEN
ICL
MOS
AMTD
NTR
StockMay 20May 26Return
Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN)100433.8+333.8%
ICL Group Ltd (ICL)100184.1+84.1%
The Mosaic Company (MOS)100183.5+83.5%
AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD)1002.7-97.3%
Nutrien Ltd. (NTR)100201.0+101.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KEN vs ICL vs MOS vs AMTD vs NTR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMTD leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Kenon Holdings Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
The Growth Play

KEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth 356.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.5%
  • 12.6% 10Y total return vs ICL's 98.7%
  • 8.6% revenue growth vs AMTD's -55.9%
  • +194.0% vs MOS's -24.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ICL
ICL Group Ltd
The Income Angle

ICL plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: basic materials exposure
MOS
The Mosaic Company
The Income Angle

MOS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: basic materials exposure
AMTD
AMTD IDEA Group
The Banking Pick

AMTD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 36.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 16.7%, current ratio 10.62x
  • Beta 0.06, yield 36.7%, current ratio 10.62x
  • Lower P/E (0.3x vs 15.9x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
The Value Pick

NTR is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.29 vs MOS's 0.92
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKEN logoKEN8.6% revenue growth vs AMTD's -55.9%
ValueAMTD logoAMTDLower P/E (0.3x vs 15.9x)
Quality / MarginsAMTD logoAMTD94.4% margin vs ICL's 5.2%
Stability / SafetyAMTD logoAMTDBeta 0.06 vs KEN's 0.90, lower leverage
DividendsAMTD logoAMTD36.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NTR's 3.2%
Momentum (1Y)KEN logoKEN+194.0% vs MOS's -24.6%
Efficiency (ROA)KEN logoKEN11.4% ROA vs ICL's 3.0%, ROIC 1.2% vs 6.3%

KEN vs ICL vs MOS vs AMTD vs NTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KENKenon Holdings Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

ICLICL Group Ltd

Segment breakdown not available.

MOSThe Mosaic Company
FY 2024
Phosphates Segment
39.9%$4.5B
Mosaic Fertilizantes
39.0%$4.4B
Potash Segment
21.1%$2.4B
AMTDAMTD IDEA Group
FY 2022
Others
100.0%$576,736
NTRNutrien Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

KEN vs ICL vs MOS vs AMTD vs NTR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMTDLAGGINGNTR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AMTD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

NTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.9B annually — 497.5x AMTD's $54M. AMTD is the more profitable business, keeping 94.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICL's 5.2%. On growth, KEN holds the edge at +8.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKEN logoKENKenon Holdings Lt…ICL logoICLICL Group LtdMOS logoMOSThe Mosaic CompanyAMTD logoAMTDAMTD IDEA GroupNTR logoNTRNutrien Ltd.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$775M$7.1B$11.7B$54M$26.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$122M$1.3B$2.2B$263M$6.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$495M$369M$1.2B$188M$2.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$222M$317M-$535M$45M$2.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+17.1%+31.9%+16.5%+45.2%+31.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.0%+10.6%+9.9%+48.2%+13.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+63.8%+5.2%+10.5%+94.4%+8.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+28.6%+4.5%-4.6%+9.5%+7.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.3%+5.7%-7.5%+6.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-95.3%-1.0%+3.8%-88.3%+4.2%
AMTD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AMTD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 0.3x trailing earnings, AMTD trades at a 99% valuation discount to ICL's 33.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MOS offers better value at 0.34x vs ICL's 0.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricKEN logoKENKenon Holdings Lt…ICL logoICLICL Group LtdMOS logoMOSThe Mosaic CompanyAMTD logoAMTDAMTD IDEA GroupNTR logoNTRNutrien Ltd.
Market CapShares × price$4.5B$7.7B$7.3B$7M$32.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.8B$10.2B$7.8B$228M$45.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS7.64x33.33x5.90x0.25x14.42x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.55x15.89x11.72x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.58x0.34x0.35x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple33.93x7.75x3.59x6.93x7.08x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.01x1.08x0.62x0.14x1.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.72x1.24x0.55x0.01x1.31x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF59.57x1.44x16.15x
AMTD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — KEN and AMTD and NTR each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

KEN delivers a 19.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $6 for ICL. MOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTR's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KEN scores 8/9 vs AMTD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricKEN logoKENKenon Holdings Lt…ICL logoICLICL Group LtdMOS logoMOSThe Mosaic CompanyAMTD logoAMTDAMTD IDEA GroupNTR logoNTRNutrien Ltd.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+19.1%+5.8%+10.0%+12.9%+9.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+11.4%+3.0%+5.0%+10.8%+4.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.2%+6.3%+6.1%+1.2%+8.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.2%+7.7%+5.9%+1.6%+9.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–983738
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.48x0.44x0.06x0.17x0.51x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$264M$2.5B$483M$221M$12.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.0B$291M$277M$63M$700M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.3B$2.8B$760M$283M$12.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.52x3.71x8.81x17.18x5.44x
Evenly matched — KEN and AMTD and NTR each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KEN five years ago would be worth $34,065 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $256 for AMTD. Over the past 12 months, KEN leads with a +194.0% total return vs MOS's -24.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KEN at 51.4% vs AMTD's -40.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKEN logoKENKenon Holdings Lt…ICL logoICLICL Group LtdMOS logoMOSThe Mosaic CompanyAMTD logoAMTDAMTD IDEA GroupNTR logoNTRNutrien Ltd.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+34.0%+4.4%-7.6%+2.9%+9.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+194.0%-9.8%-24.6%+5.0%+24.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+246.9%+7.5%-32.7%-78.8%+16.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+240.6%+12.6%-27.9%-97.4%+28.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1256.7%+98.7%+14.9%-91.4%+54.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+51.4%+2.4%-12.4%-40.4%+5.1%
KEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — KEN and NTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NTR is the less volatile stock with a -0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KEN's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KEN currently trades 90.3% from its 52-week high vs MOS's 59.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKEN logoKENKenon Holdings Lt…ICL logoICLICL Group LtdMOS logoMOSThe Mosaic CompanyAMTD logoAMTDAMTD IDEA GroupNTR logoNTRNutrien Ltd.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.90x0.66x0.51x0.05x-0.08x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$95.93$7.35$38.23$1.65$85.36
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$30.42$4.76$22.74$0.87$53.03
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.3%+81.6%+59.9%+63.6%+80.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.361.942.748.348.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded26K1.7M9.5M24K3.8M
Evenly matched — KEN and NTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — AMTD and NTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: KEN as "Hold", ICL as "Hold", MOS as "Hold", NTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.4% upside for MOS (target: $31) vs 2.5% for ICL (target: $6). For income investors, AMTD offers the higher dividend yield at 36.70% vs ICL's 2.89%.

MetricKEN logoKENKenon Holdings Lt…ICL logoICLICL Group LtdMOS logoMOSThe Mosaic CompanyAMTD logoAMTDAMTD IDEA GroupNTR logoNTRNutrien Ltd.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$6.15$31.25$85.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts144933
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.4%+2.9%+4.2%+36.7%+3.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10118
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.80$0.17$0.95$0.39$2.22
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%+1.7%
Evenly matched — AMTD and NTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AMTD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KEN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallAMTD IDEA Group (AMTD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KEN vs ICL vs MOS vs AMTD vs NTR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KEN or ICL or MOS or AMTD or NTR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Kenon Holdings Ltd.

(KEN) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KEN or ICL or MOS or AMTD or NTR?

On trailing P/E, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the cheapest at 0.

3x versus ICL Group Ltd at 33. 3x. On forward P/E, Nutrien Ltd. is actually cheaper at 11. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Nutrien Ltd. wins at 0. 29x versus The Mosaic Company's 0. 92x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KEN or ICL or MOS or AMTD or NTR?

Over the past 5 years, Kenon Holdings Ltd.

(KEN) delivered a total return of +240. 6%, compared to -97. 4% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KEN returned +1279% versus AMTD's -91. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KEN or ICL or MOS or AMTD or NTR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nutrien Ltd.

(NTR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 08β versus Kenon Holdings Ltd. 's 0. 90β — meaning KEN is approximately -1281% more volatile than NTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Mosaic Company (MOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 51% for Nutrien Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KEN or ICL or MOS or AMTD or NTR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kenon Holdings Ltd.

(KEN) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Mosaic Company grew EPS 605. 5% year-over-year, compared to -68. 5% for AMTD IDEA Group. Over a 3-year CAGR, KEN leads at 15. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KEN or ICL or MOS or AMTD or NTR?

AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the more profitable company, earning 94.

4% net margin versus 3. 2% for ICL Group Ltd — meaning it keeps 94. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMTD leads at 48. 2% versus 6. 3% for KEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMTD leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KEN or ICL or MOS or AMTD or NTR more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus The Mosaic Company's 0. 92x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 16. 6x for ICL Group Ltd — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MOS: 36. 4% to $31. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KEN or ICL or MOS or AMTD or NTR?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) offers the highest yield at 36. 7%, versus 2. 9% for ICL Group Ltd (ICL).

09

Is KEN or ICL or MOS or AMTD or NTR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nutrien Ltd.

(NTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 08), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTR: +54. 0%, ICL: +107. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KEN and ICL and MOS and AMTD and NTR?

These companies operate in different sectors (KEN (Utilities) and ICL (Basic Materials) and MOS (Basic Materials) and AMTD (Financial Services) and NTR (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KEN is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MOS is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMTD is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTR is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

KEN

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ICL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MOS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMTD

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 56%
  • Dividend Yield > 14.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KEN and ICL and MOS and AMTD and NTR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KEN: 8.3% · ICL: 5.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(KEN: 63.8% · ICL: 5.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(KEN: 7.6x · ICL: 33.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.