Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KEYS vs COHR vs VIAV vs MKSI vs FORM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Communication Equipment
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
KEYS vs COHR vs VIAV vs MKSI vs FORM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Communication Equipment | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $60.85B | $50.62B | $11.81B | $20.25B | $11.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.68B | $1.81T | $1.37B | $4.07B | $840M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $958M | $191.68B | $-55M | $327M | $68M |
| Gross Margin | 61.9% | 0.1% | 55.7% | 45.2% | 42.1% |
| Operating Margin | 16.0% | 0.0% | 8.2% | 14.8% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | 39.8x | 59.5x | 55.2x | 30.4x | 66.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.97B | $3.89B | $692M | $4.69B | $45M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.87B | $909M | $424M | $675M | $103M |
KEYS vs COHR vs VIAV vs MKSI vs FORM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keysight Technologi… (KEYS) | 100 | 328.1 | +228.1% |
| Coherent, Inc. (COHR) | 100 | 671.6 | +571.6% |
| Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) | 100 | 440.5 | +340.5% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 284.8 | +184.8% |
| FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) | 100 | 574.8 | +474.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KEYS vs COHR vs VIAV vs MKSI vs FORM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KEYS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency.
- PEG 4.97 vs VIAV's 12.09
- 16.9% margin vs VIAV's -4.0%
- 8.3% ROA vs VIAV's -2.3%, ROIC 11.5% vs 5.5%
COHR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 23.4%, EPS growth 71.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.5%
- 23.4% revenue growth vs FORM's 2.8%
VIAV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.
- Beta 1.54 vs COHR's 2.79
- +466.6% vs KEYS's +137.2%
MKSI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.64, yield 0.3%
- Beta 2.64, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.71x
- Lower P/E (30.4x vs 66.5x)
- 0.3% yield, vs COHR's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
FORM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 19.5% 10Y total return vs COHR's 14.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.02, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 4.50x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.4% revenue growth vs FORM's 2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.4x vs 66.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.9% margin vs VIAV's -4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.54 vs COHR's 2.79 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, vs COHR's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +466.6% vs KEYS's +137.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs VIAV's -2.3%, ROIC 11.5% vs 5.5% |
KEYS vs COHR vs VIAV vs MKSI vs FORM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KEYS vs COHR vs VIAV vs MKSI vs FORM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KEYS leads in 1 of 6 categories
MKSI leads 1 • COHR leads 1 • VIAV leads 0 • FORM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KEYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COHR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.81T annually — 2155.8x FORM's $840M. KEYS is the more profitable business, keeping 16.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VIAV's -4.0%. On growth, COHR holds the edge at +1204.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.7B | $1.81T | $1.4B | $4.1B | $840M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $913M | $207M | $945M | $152M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $958M | $191.7B | -$55M | $327M | $68M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | -$537.2B | $46M | $401M | -$5M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.9% | +0.1% | +55.7% | +45.2% | +42.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +0.0% | +8.2% | +14.8% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +10.6% | -4.0% | +8.0% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.8% | -29.7% | +3.3% | +9.8% | -0.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.3% | +1204.5% | +42.8% | +15.2% | +32.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +68.0% | +11190.8% | -70.2% | +53.2% | +2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MKSI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 68.8x trailing earnings, MKSI trades at a 80% valuation discount to VIAV's 340.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KEYS offers better value at 9.08x vs VIAV's 74.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $60.9B | $50.6B | $11.8B | $20.2B | $11.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $62.0B | $53.6B | $12.1B | $24.3B | $11.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 72.70x | -613.83x | 340.33x | 68.83x | 209.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 39.84x | 59.48x | 55.18x | 30.36x | 66.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 9.08x | — | 74.57x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 50.65x | 48.61x | 90.43x | 26.70x | 100.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.32x | 8.71x | 10.89x | 5.15x | 14.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.44x | 5.83x | 14.77x | 7.49x | 10.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 47.50x | 262.58x | 190.52x | 40.74x | 960.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — KEYS and FORM each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KEYS delivers a 15.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-7 for VIAV. FORM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COHR scores 7/9 vs FORM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.4% | +6.9% | -6.9% | +12.2% | +6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.3% | +4.4% | -2.3% | +3.7% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.5% | +3.6% | +5.5% | +6.5% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.0% | +4.2% | +4.9% | +7.2% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.46x | 0.89x | 1.73x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $3.0B | $269M | $4.0B | -$58M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $909M | $424M | $675M | $103M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.0B | $3.9B | $692M | $4.7B | $45M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.03x | 0.01x | 2.70x | 2.84x | 252.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COHR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COHR five years ago would be worth $50,156 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,648 for MKSI. Over the past 12 months, VIAV leads with a +466.6% total return vs KEYS's +137.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COHR at 114.9% vs KEYS's 35.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +71.7% | +64.3% | +181.3% | +78.8% | +144.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +137.2% | +358.5% | +466.6% | +306.1% | +387.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.9% | +892.8% | +461.0% | +266.0% | +417.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.4% | +401.6% | +212.0% | +66.5% | +273.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1279.4% | +1467.0% | +715.5% | +750.6% | +1952.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.3% | +114.9% | +77.7% | +54.1% | +72.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KEYS and VIAV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VIAV is the less volatile stock with a 1.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COHR's 2.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KEYS currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs VIAV's 84.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.71x | 2.79x | 1.54x | 2.64x | 2.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $367.12 | $364.80 | $60.43 | $326.83 | $159.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $146.23 | $67.30 | $8.87 | $71.49 | $26.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +87.5% | +84.5% | +92.0% | +90.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.0 | 64.4 | 66.7 | 65.3 | 66.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 6.8M | 6.3M | 1.2M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VIAV and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KEYS as "Buy", COHR as "Buy", VIAV as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", FORM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -9.3% upside for MKSI (target: $273) vs -36.8% for VIAV (target: $32). MKSI is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $289.25 | $252.50 | $32.25 | $272.86 | $123.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 29 | 19 | 29 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.07 | — | $0.87 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +0.1% | +0.1% | +0.2% | +0.2% |
KEYS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). MKSI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
KEYS vs COHR vs VIAV vs MKSI vs FORM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KEYS or COHR or VIAV or MKSI or FORM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coherent, Inc.
(COHR) is the stronger pick with 23. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 8% for FormFactor, Inc. (FORM). MKS Inc. (MKSI) offers the better valuation at 68. 8x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Keysight Technologies, Inc. (KEYS) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KEYS or COHR or VIAV or MKSI or FORM?
On trailing P/E, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the cheapest at 68. 8x versus Viavi Solutions Inc. at 340. 3x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Keysight Technologies, Inc. wins at 4. 97x versus Viavi Solutions Inc. 's 12. 09x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KEYS or COHR or VIAV or MKSI or FORM?
Over the past 5 years, Coherent, Inc.
(COHR) delivered a total return of +401. 6%, compared to +66. 5% for MKS Inc. (MKSI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FORM returned +1952% versus VIAV's +715. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KEYS or COHR or VIAV or MKSI or FORM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 54β versus Coherent, Inc. 's 2. 79β — meaning COHR is approximately 81% more volatile than VIAV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KEYS or COHR or VIAV or MKSI or FORM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coherent, Inc.
(COHR) is pulling ahead at 23. 4% versus 2. 8% for FormFactor, Inc. (FORM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viavi Solutions Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -22. 5% for FormFactor, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COHR leads at 20. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KEYS or COHR or VIAV or MKSI or FORM?
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
(KEYS) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 7% net margin versus 0. 8% for Coherent, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KEYS leads at 17. 6% versus 6. 5% for VIAV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KEYS leads at 62. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KEYS or COHR or VIAV or MKSI or FORM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Keysight Technologies, Inc. (KEYS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 4. 97x versus Viavi Solutions Inc. 's 12. 09x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc. (MKSI) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 66. 5x for FormFactor, Inc. — 36. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MKSI: -9. 3% to $272. 86.
08Which pays a better dividend — KEYS or COHR or VIAV or MKSI or FORM?
In this comparison, MKSI (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. KEYS, COHR, VIAV, FORM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KEYS or COHR or VIAV or MKSI or FORM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Keysight Technologies, Inc.
(KEYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1279% 10Y return). MKS Inc. (MKSI) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KEYS: +1279%, MKSI: +750. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KEYS and COHR and VIAV and MKSI and FORM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KEYS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; COHR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VIAV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FORM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.