Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KFRC vs HURN vs KELYA vs FORR vs MAN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KFRC
Kforce Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$790M
5Y Perf.+43.1%
HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc.

Consulting Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.02B
5Y Perf.+169.7%
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$349M
5Y Perf.-35.3%
FORR
Forrester Research, Inc.

Consulting Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$125M
5Y Perf.-79.2%
MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.41B
5Y Perf.-56.0%

KFRC vs HURN vs KELYA vs FORR vs MAN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KFRC logoKFRC
HURN logoHURN
KELYA logoKELYA
FORR logoFORR
MAN logoMAN
IndustryStaffing & Employment ServicesConsulting ServicesStaffing & Employment ServicesConsulting ServicesStaffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$790M$2.02B$349M$125M$1.41B
Revenue (TTM)$1.33B$1.74B$3.09B$397M$17.96B
Net Income (TTM)$35M$104M$-266M$-119M$-13M
Gross Margin27.2%23.3%26.3%64.6%16.7%
Operating Margin3.8%11.3%-2.8%-20.9%0.8%
Forward P/E18.0x14.2x11.0x8.5x8.3x
Total Debt$70M$548M$159M$72M$2.39B
Cash & Equiv.$2M$25M$33M$63M$871M

KFRC vs HURN vs KELYA vs FORR vs MANLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KFRC
HURN
KELYA
FORR
MAN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Kforce Inc. (KFRC)100143.1+43.1%
Huron Consulting Gr… (HURN)100269.7+169.7%
Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA)10064.7-35.3%
Forrester Research,… (FORR)10020.8-79.2%
ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN)10044.0-56.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KFRC vs HURN vs KELYA vs FORR vs MAN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KFRC leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. Huron Consulting Group Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. MAN also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
KFRC
Kforce Inc.
The Income Pick

KFRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
  • 195.5% 10Y total return vs HURN's 116.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
  • Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
The Growth Play

HURN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth -6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
  • 14.3% revenue growth vs FORR's -8.2%
  • 6.0% margin vs FORR's -30.1%
Best for: growth exposure
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.
The Income Angle

KELYA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
FORR
Forrester Research, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

Among these 5 stocks, FORR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.
The Value Play

MAN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.

  • Lower P/E (8.3x vs 8.5x)
  • 4.7% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: value and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHURN logoHURN14.3% revenue growth vs FORR's -8.2%
ValueMAN logoMANLower P/E (8.3x vs 8.5x)
Quality / MarginsHURN logoHURN6.0% margin vs FORR's -30.1%
Stability / SafetyKFRC logoKFRCBeta 0.53 vs MAN's 1.03, lower leverage
DividendsMAN logoMAN4.7% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)KFRC logoKFRC+18.9% vs FORR's -35.7%
Efficiency (ROA)KFRC logoKFRC9.2% ROA vs FORR's -28.2%, ROIC 19.1% vs 0.8%

KFRC vs HURN vs KELYA vs FORR vs MAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KFRCKforce Inc.
FY 2025
Flex Revenue
98.1%$1.3B
Direct Hire Revenue
1.9%$26M
HURNHuron Consulting Group Inc.
FY 2025
Healthcare
50.5%$858M
Education
30.0%$510M
Commercial
19.5%$331M
KELYAKelly Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Science, Engineering & Technology
55.1%$1.2B
Education
44.9%$1.0B
FORRForrester Research, Inc.
FY 2025
Research Revenue
96.2%$296M
Professional Services
3.4%$10M
Software
0.5%$1M
MANManpowerGroup Inc.
FY 2024
StaffingandInterim
87.5%$15.7B
Outcome-BasedSolutionsandConsulting
7.0%$1.3B
PermanentRecruitment
2.7%$492M
Other
2.7%$482M
Franchise
0.1%$14M

KFRC vs HURN vs KELYA vs FORR vs MAN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKFRCLAGGINGFORR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HURN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 45.2x FORR's $397M. HURN is the more profitable business, keeping 6.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FORR's -30.1%. On growth, HURN holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.HURN logoHURNHuron Consulting …KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…FORR logoFORRForrester Researc…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.3B$1.7B$3.1B$397M$18.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$56M$231M-$54M-$66M$236M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$35M$104M-$266M-$119M-$13M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$43M$124M$66M$18M-$161M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+27.2%+23.3%+26.3%+64.6%+16.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.8%+11.3%-2.8%-20.9%+0.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.6%+6.0%-8.6%-30.1%-0.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.3%+7.1%+2.1%+4.6%-0.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.1%+14.2%-100.0%-6.5%+7.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.2%+0.8%-2.1%-79.1%+36.2%
HURN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 21.4x trailing earnings, HURN trades at a 3% valuation discount to KFRC's 22.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FORR's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KFRC's 15.4x.

MetricKFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.HURN logoHURNHuron Consulting …KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…FORR logoFORRForrester Researc…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.
Market CapShares × price$790M$2.0B$349M$125M$1.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$858M$2.5B$475M$134M$2.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS22.05x21.37x-1.34x-1.04x-104.90x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.96x14.18x10.96x8.54x8.28x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.42x10.99x8.00x9.02x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.59x1.19x0.08x0.32x0.08x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.17x4.25x0.35x0.98x0.69x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.88x11.06x3.06x6.92x
MAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KFRC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-81 for FORR. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HURN scores 5/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricKFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.HURN logoHURNHuron Consulting …KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…FORR logoFORRForrester Researc…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+27.2%+21.8%-24.6%-80.8%-0.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+9.2%+6.8%-11.3%-28.2%-0.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+19.1%+15.0%-4.0%+0.8%+5.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+20.1%+18.6%-4.3%+0.8%+6.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945541
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.56x1.04x0.16x0.57x1.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$68M$524M$126M$9M$1.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2M$25M$33M$63M$871M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$70M$548M$159M$72M$2.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.70x-12.07x-30.30x1.98x
KFRC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — KFRC and HURN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HURN five years ago would be worth $22,023 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,413 for FORR. Over the past 12 months, KFRC leads with a +18.9% total return vs FORR's -35.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HURN at 17.6% vs FORR's -36.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.HURN logoHURNHuron Consulting …KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…FORR logoFORRForrester Researc…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+39.2%-27.1%+13.1%-19.9%+1.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+18.9%-17.2%-12.2%-35.7%-17.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-13.8%+62.5%-34.2%-74.5%-46.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-16.8%+120.2%-58.3%-85.9%-64.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+195.5%+116.8%-33.0%-75.9%-30.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-4.8%+17.6%-13.0%-36.6%-18.8%
Evenly matched — KFRC and HURN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MAN's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs FORR's 56.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.HURN logoHURNHuron Consulting …KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…FORR logoFORRForrester Researc…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.53x0.82x1.01x0.68x1.03x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$47.48$186.78$14.94$11.57$47.34
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$24.49$112.45$7.98$4.88$25.15
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.0%+66.8%+64.9%+56.4%+64.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.637.463.751.647.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded305K243K361K109K1.1M
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KFRC and MAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: KFRC as "Hold", HURN as "Buy", KELYA as "Buy", FORR as "Hold", MAN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 24.5% for MAN (target: $38). For income investors, MAN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.71% vs KELYA's 3.23%.

MetricKFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.HURN logoHURNHuron Consulting …KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…FORR logoFORRForrester Researc…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$71.00$200.00$15.00$37.86
# AnalystsCovering analysts1095429
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.6%+3.2%+4.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises81560
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.55$0.31$1.43
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+6.4%+8.2%+3.5%+2.0%+2.7%
Evenly matched — KFRC and MAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KFRC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). HURN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallKforce Inc. (KFRC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KFRC vs HURN vs KELYA vs FORR vs MAN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KFRC or HURN or KELYA or FORR or MAN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 2% for Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR). Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) offers the better valuation at 21. 4x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KFRC or HURN or KELYA or FORR or MAN?

On trailing P/E, Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) is the cheapest at 21. 4x versus Kforce Inc. at 22. 1x. On forward P/E, ManpowerGroup Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KFRC or HURN or KELYA or FORR or MAN?

Over the past 5 years, Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) delivered a total return of +120. 2%, compared to -85. 9% for Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFRC returned +195. 5% versus FORR's -75. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KFRC or HURN or KELYA or FORR or MAN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.

(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus ManpowerGroup Inc. 's 1. 03β — meaning MAN is approximately 95% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KFRC or HURN or KELYA or FORR or MAN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus -8. 2% for Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Huron Consulting Group Inc. grew EPS -6. 9% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HURN leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KFRC or HURN or KELYA or FORR or MAN?

Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 2% net margin versus -30. 1% for Forrester Research, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HURN leads at 11. 7% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FORR leads at 53. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KFRC or HURN or KELYA or FORR or MAN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc.

(MAN) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 18. 0x for Kforce Inc. — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KFRC or HURN or KELYA or FORR or MAN?

In this comparison, MAN (4.

7% yield), KFRC (3. 6% yield), KELYA (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. HURN, FORR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is KFRC or HURN or KELYA or FORR or MAN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.

(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, FORR: -75. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KFRC and HURN and KELYA and FORR and MAN?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HURN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FORR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. KFRC, KELYA, MAN pay a dividend while HURN, FORR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

KFRC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HURN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KELYA

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FORR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MAN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KFRC and HURN and KELYA and FORR and MAN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KFRC: 0.1% · HURN: 14.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(KFRC: 2.6% · HURN: 6.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(KFRC: 22.1x · HURN: 21.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.