Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KFS vs HIHO vs FLXS vs DAKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
KFS vs HIHO vs FLXS vs DAKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $338M | $3M | $299M | $1.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $147M | $6M | $458M | $803M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $-535K | $22M | $28M |
| Gross Margin | 85.3% | 29.4% | 23.2% | 26.6% |
| Operating Margin | -4.5% | -21.6% | 6.1% | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 32.5x | 11.8x | 22.1x |
| Total Debt | $78M | $810K | $59M | $17M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $6M | $40M | $128M |
KFS vs HIHO vs FLXS vs DAKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kingsway Financial … (KFS) | 100 | 529.1 | +429.1% |
| Highway Holdings Li… (HIHO) | 100 | 40.8 | -59.2% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 562.3 | +462.3% |
| Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) | 100 | 484.2 | +384.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KFS vs HIHO vs FLXS vs DAKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KFS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 21.5%, EPS growth -26.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.0%
- 21.5% revenue growth vs DAKT's -7.5%
HIHO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 14.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 12.9%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.64, yield 14.3%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.64 vs DAKT's 1.49
FLXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (11.8x vs 22.1x)
- 4.8% margin vs HIHO's -8.7%
- +77.1% vs HIHO's -56.5%
- 7.5% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 9.9% vs -31.7%
DAKT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 162.3% 10Y total return vs KFS's 156.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.5% revenue growth vs DAKT's -7.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.8x vs 22.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs HIHO's -8.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs DAKT's 1.49 | |
| Dividends | 14.3% yield, vs FLXS's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.1% vs HIHO's -56.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 9.9% vs -31.7% |
KFS vs HIHO vs FLXS vs DAKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KFS vs HIHO vs FLXS vs DAKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HIHO leads in 1 of 6 categories
FLXS leads 1 • DAKT leads 1 • KFS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — KFS and FLXS and DAKT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $803M annually — 130.7x HIHO's $6M. FLXS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HIHO's -8.7%. On growth, KFS holds the edge at +35.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $147M | $6M | $458M | $803M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $817,000 | -$653,000 | $31M | $65M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | -$535,000 | $22M | $28M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$346,000 | $0 | $28M | $62M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.3% | +29.4% | +23.2% | +26.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | -21.6% | +6.1% | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | -8.7% | +4.8% | +3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | -6.2% | +6.1% | +7.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.9% | -44.3% | +9.8% | +21.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.1% | -2.5% | -27.2% | +117.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HIHO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, FLXS trades at a 52% valuation discount to HIHO's 32.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FLXS's 10.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DAKT's 16.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $338M | $3M | $299M | $1.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $400M | -$2M | $318M | $890M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -27.44x | 32.49x | 15.73x | -97.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 11.79x | 22.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | -23.17x | 10.50x | 16.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.47x | 0.47x | 0.68x | 1.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.55x | 0.55x | 1.89x | 3.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.85x | 12.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-34 for KFS. DAKT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KFS's 2.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs KFS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -34.4% | -9.0% | +12.2% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.5% | -6.4% | +7.5% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.4% | -31.7% | +9.9% | +13.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.7% | -7.7% | +12.3% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.27x | 0.13x | 0.35x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $62M | -$5M | $19M | -$111M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $6M | $40M | $128M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $78M | $810,000 | $59M | $17M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.83x | — | 380.21x | 37.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DAKT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DAKT five years ago would be worth $32,028 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,274 for HIHO. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +77.1% total return vs HIHO's -56.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAKT at 59.2% vs HIHO's -18.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | -42.8% | +40.4% | +3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.7% | -56.5% | +77.1% | +47.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.8% | -46.0% | +246.5% | +303.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +134.6% | -57.3% | +29.5% | +220.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +156.5% | -41.3% | +53.0% | +162.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.2% | -18.6% | +51.3% | +59.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HIHO and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HIHO is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DAKT's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs HIHO's 35.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 0.64x | 1.45x | 1.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.80 | $2.21 | $59.95 | $28.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.82 | $0.74 | $29.38 | $13.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.2% | +35.4% | +93.1% | +72.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.0 | 45.2 | 60.7 | 51.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 83K | 60K | 47K | 444K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KFS and HIHO and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, HIHO offers the higher dividend yield at 14.27% vs KFS's 0.31%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $54.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +14.3% | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $0.11 | $0.63 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.9% | +2.9% |
HIHO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). FLXS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
KFS vs HIHO vs FLXS vs DAKT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KFS or HIHO or FLXS or DAKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kingsway Financial Services Inc.
(KFS) is the stronger pick with 21. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 5% for Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KFS or HIHO or FLXS or DAKT?
On trailing P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the cheapest at 15. 7x versus Highway Holdings Limited at 32. 5x. On forward P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KFS or HIHO or FLXS or DAKT?
Over the past 5 years, Daktronics, Inc.
(DAKT) delivered a total return of +220. 3%, compared to -57. 3% for Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DAKT returned +162. 3% versus HIHO's -41. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KFS or HIHO or FLXS or DAKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
64β versus Daktronics, Inc. 's 1. 49β — meaning DAKT is approximately 133% more volatile than HIHO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 2% for Kingsway Financial Services Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KFS or HIHO or FLXS or DAKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kingsway Financial Services Inc.
(KFS) is pulling ahead at 21. 5% versus -7. 5% for Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Highway Holdings Limited grew EPS 111. 0% year-over-year, compared to -128. 4% for Daktronics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DAKT leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KFS or HIHO or FLXS or DAKT?
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus -7. 8% for Kingsway Financial Services Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLXS leads at 6. 0% versus -10. 2% for KFS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KFS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KFS or HIHO or FLXS or DAKT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 22. 1x for Daktronics, Inc. — 10. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — KFS or HIHO or FLXS or DAKT?
In this comparison, HIHO (14.
3% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield), KFS (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. DAKT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KFS or HIHO or FLXS or DAKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
64), 14. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HIHO: -41. 3%, DAKT: +162. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KFS and HIHO and FLXS and DAKT?
These companies operate in different sectors (KFS (Consumer Cyclical) and HIHO (Industrials) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and DAKT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KFS is a small-cap high-growth stock; HIHO is a small-cap high-growth stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; DAKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HIHO, FLXS pay a dividend while KFS, DAKT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.