KIDZW
KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04.03.30 on KIDZ AI
Education & Training Services
Market Cap$21K
5Y Perf.-99.5%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisKIDZW
GOTU
COE
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GOTU
Gaotu Techedu Inc.
Education & Training Services
Market Cap$551M
5Y Perf.-13.1%
COE
51Talk Online Education Group
Software - Application
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.+262.2%
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  KIDZW |  GOTU |  COE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $21K | $551M | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $6.15B | $96M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-323M | $-16M |
| Gross Margin | 57.8% | 67.4% | 74.0% |
| Operating Margin | -136.5% | -8.2% | -14.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 355.8x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $586M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $712M | $39M |
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
KIDZW
GOTU
COE
| Stock | Feb 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIDZ AI Inc. Warran… (KIDZW) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 86.9 | -13.1% |
| 51Talk Online Educa… (COE) | 100 | 362.2 | +262.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: COE leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Gaotu Techedu Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇COE emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
KIDZW
KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04.03.30 on KIDZ AI
The Secondary Option
KIDZW plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
Best for: consumer defensive exposure
GOTU
Gaotu Techedu Inc.
The Income Pick
GOTU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.98
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, Low D/E 46.7%, current ratio 0.94x
- -5.3% margin vs KIDZW's -356.2%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
COE
51Talk Online Education Group
The Growth Play
COE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 89.1%, EPS growth -137.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 85.4%
- -76.3% 10Y total return vs GOTU's -85.5%
- Beta 0.76, current ratio 0.63x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  COE | 89.1% revenue growth vs KIDZW's -8.4% |
| Value | COE | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins |  GOTU | -5.3% margin vs KIDZW's -356.2% |
| Stability / Safety | COE | Beta 0.76 vs KIDZW's 2.66 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | COE | -26.5% vs KIDZW's -99.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GOTU | -5.8% ROA vs KIDZW's -60.2%, ROIC -33.8% vs -57.7% |
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLKIDZWLAGGINGCOE
Who Leads Where
KIDZW leads in 1 of 6 categories
GOTU leads 1 • COE leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓COE51Talk Online Educati…
1leads
GOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.
1leads
KIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warrant …
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GOTUvs COEMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
KIDZW2/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GOTU7/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
COE5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GOTU and COE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 2002.5x KIDZW's $3M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -5.3% (GOTU) to -3.6% (KIDZW). On growth, COE holds the edge at +89.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | KIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warr… | GOTUGaotu Techedu Inc. | COE51Talk Online Edu… |
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $6.1B | $96M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$327M | -$15M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$323M | -$16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $247M | $10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.8% | +67.4% | +74.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -136.5% | -8.2% | -14.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | -5.3% | -16.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -136.0% | +4.0% | +9.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.4% | +21.4% | +89.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.4% | +36.1% | -2.9% |
Evenly matched — GOTU and COE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
KIDZW leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | KIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warr… | GOTUGaotu Techedu Inc. | COE51Talk Online Edu… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21,143 | $551M | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $533M | -$34M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -12.24x | -0.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 355.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 0.61x | 0.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 3.01x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.12x | 0.21x |
KIDZW leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOTU leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOTU delivers a -20.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-21 in annual profit, vs $-3 for KIDZW. GOTU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KIDZW's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOTU scores 5/9 vs COE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | KIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warr… | GOTUGaotu Techedu Inc. | COE51Talk Online Edu… |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.8% | -20.8% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -60.2% | -5.8% | -27.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -57.7% | -33.8% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -61.4% | -22.2% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.50x | 0.47x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | -$127M | -$36M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $712M | $39M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $586M | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.06x | — | — |
GOTU leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COE five years ago would be worth $4,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $50 for KIDZW. Over the past 12 months, COE leads with a -26.5% total return vs KIDZW's -99.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COE at 45.8% vs KIDZW's -72.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | KIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warr… | GOTUGaotu Techedu Inc. | COE51Talk Online Edu… |
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.2% | -37.7% | -35.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.2% | -61.9% | -26.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | -54.2% | +210.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -90.6% | -51.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -85.5% | -76.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -72.4% | -22.9% | +45.8% |
COE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GOTU and COE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
COE is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KIDZW's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOTU currently trades 36.9% from its 52-week high vs KIDZW's 0.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | KIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warr… | GOTUGaotu Techedu Inc. | COE51Talk Online Edu… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.66x | 0.98x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.48 | $4.12 | $56.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $1.40 | $15.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.6% | +36.9% | +35.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.4 | 30.7 | 37.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 396K | 8K |
Evenly matched — GOTU and COE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOTU as "Hold", COE as "Buy".
| Metric | KIDZWKIDZ AI Inc. Warr… | GOTUGaotu Techedu Inc. | COE51Talk Online Edu… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.94 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.2% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
KIDZW leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). GOTU leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Best OverallKIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 -… (KIDZW)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
KIDZW vs GOTU vs COE: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIDZW or GOTU or COE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is the stronger pick with 89.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW). Analysts rate 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KIDZW or GOTU or COE?
Over the past 5 years, 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) delivered a total return of -51.
1%, compared to -99. 5% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COE returned -76. 3% versus KIDZW's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KIDZW or GOTU or COE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
76β versus KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI's 2. 66β — meaning KIDZW is approximately 249% more volatile than COE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 3% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KIDZW or GOTU or COE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is pulling ahead at 89.
1% versus -8. 4% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gaotu Techedu Inc. grew EPS 69. 6% year-over-year, compared to -498. 7% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI. Over a 3-year CAGR, COE leads at 85. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KIDZW or GOTU or COE?
Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the more profitable company, earning -5. 3% net margin versus -209. 3% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI — meaning it keeps -5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOTU leads at -8. 2% versus -106. 7% for KIDZW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COE leads at 73. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — KIDZW or GOTU or COE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is KIDZW or GOTU or COE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, 51Talk Online Education Group (COE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
76)). KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (COE: -76. 3%, KIDZW: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between KIDZW and GOTU and COE?
These companies operate in different sectors (KIDZW (Consumer Defensive) and GOTU (Consumer Defensive) and COE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KIDZW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; COE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.