Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KIDZW vs GOTU vs DUOL vs CHGG vs PRDO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Software - Application
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
KIDZW vs GOTU vs DUOL vs CHGG vs PRDO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Software - Application | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $1.00 | $760M | $5.29B | $143M | $2.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $5.85B | $1.10B | $319M | $855M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-374M | $422M | $-86M | $170M |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 67.5% | 72.7% | 61.9% | 51.8% |
| Operating Margin | -79.0% | -9.1% | 14.2% | -11.1% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 38.4x | — | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $492M | $94M | $84M | $105M |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $1.32B | $1.04B | $31M | $132M |
KIDZW vs GOTU vs DUOL vs CHGG vs PRDO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classover Holdings,… (KIDZW) | 100 | 26.7 | -73.3% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 63.3 | -36.7% |
| Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) | 100 | 176.0 | +76.0% |
| Perdoceo Education … (PRDO) | 100 | 137.1 | +37.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIDZW vs GOTU vs DUOL vs CHGG vs PRDO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, KIDZW doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GOTU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 56.0% revenue growth vs KIDZW's -100.0%
DUOL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 38.7%, EPS growth 355.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 41.1%
- 38.4% margin vs KIDZW's -53.2%
- 22.6% ROA vs CHGG's -26.3%, ROIC 40.8% vs -13.4%
CHGG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +79.3% vs KIDZW's -92.6%
PRDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 1.6%
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs DUOL's -18.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 10.8%, current ratio 5.06x
- Beta 0.48, yield 1.6%, current ratio 5.06x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.0% revenue growth vs KIDZW's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.4% margin vs KIDZW's -53.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs CHGG's 2.97, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.3% vs KIDZW's -92.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.6% ROA vs CHGG's -26.3%, ROIC 40.8% vs -13.4% |
KIDZW vs GOTU vs DUOL vs CHGG vs PRDO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KIDZW vs GOTU vs DUOL vs CHGG vs PRDO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRDO leads in 4 of 6 categories
DUOL leads 2 • KIDZW leads 0 • GOTU leads 0 • CHGG leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DUOL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 1580.2x KIDZW's $4M. DUOL is the more profitable business, keeping 38.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZW's -53.2%. On growth, GOTU holds the edge at +32.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $5.8B | $1.1B | $319M | $855M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$378M | $167M | $11M | $247M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$374M | $422M | -$86M | $170M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $0 | $423M | -$25M | $221M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +67.5% | +72.7% | +61.9% | +51.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -79.0% | -9.1% | +14.2% | -11.1% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.2% | -6.4% | +38.4% | -26.9% | +19.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -94.8% | +1.7% | +38.5% | -8.0% | +25.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.5% | +32.9% | +26.5% | -47.9% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +66.7% | +29.2% | +101.2% | +30.8% |
Valuation Metrics
PRDO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, DUOL trades at a 7% valuation discount to PRDO's 14.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRDO's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DUOL's 29.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1 | $760M | $5.3B | $143M | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1 | $638M | $4.4B | $196M | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -4.86x | 13.26x | -1.33x | 14.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 38.44x | — | 12.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.09x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 29.01x | 12.82x | 8.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.12x | 5.10x | 0.38x | 2.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.67x | 4.07x | 1.15x | 2.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 64.81x | 14.32x | — | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DUOL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DUOL delivers a 33.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-63 for CHGG. DUOL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHGG's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRDO scores 7/9 vs KIDZW's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.5% | -21.8% | +33.6% | -62.9% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.7% | -6.8% | +22.6% | -26.3% | +13.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -47.8% | +40.8% | -13.4% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -39.9% | +7.9% | -26.5% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.25x | 0.07x | 0.70x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | -$829M | -$943M | $53M | -$27M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $1.3B | $1.0B | $31M | $132M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $492M | $94M | $84M | $105M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.46x | — | — | -525.53x | 50.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRDO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRDO five years ago would be worth $29,850 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $150 for CHGG. Over the past 12 months, CHGG leads with a +79.3% total return vs KIDZW's -92.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRDO at 43.5% vs CHGG's -49.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.8% | -19.3% | -35.6% | +30.6% | +18.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -92.6% | -39.4% | -77.1% | +79.3% | +15.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -32.3% | -13.8% | -87.3% | +195.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -92.4% | -18.3% | -98.5% | +198.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -81.2% | -18.3% | -70.8% | +505.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -12.2% | -4.8% | -49.8% | +43.5% |
Risk & Volatility
PRDO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHGG's 2.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRDO currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs KIDZW's 3.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.64x | 0.99x | 1.20x | 2.97x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.38 | $4.56 | $544.93 | $1.90 | $38.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $1.84 | $87.89 | $0.53 | $26.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.5% | +43.2% | +20.8% | +67.4% | +89.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 52.7 | 52.3 | 63.3 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 99K | 395K | 2.6M | 1.3M | 584K |
Analyst Outlook
PRDO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOTU as "Hold", DUOL as "Hold", CHGG as "Hold", PRDO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2276.6% upside for CHGG (target: $30) vs -12.9% for PRDO (target: $30). PRDO is the only dividend payer here at 1.62% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.94 | $220.56 | $30.42 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 22 | 22 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.6% |
PRDO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). DUOL leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
KIDZW vs GOTU vs DUOL vs CHGG vs PRDO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIDZW or GOTU or DUOL or CHGG or PRDO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the stronger pick with 56. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW). Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (38. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KIDZW or GOTU or DUOL or CHGG or PRDO?
On trailing P/E, Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus Perdoceo Education Corporation at 14. 2x. On forward P/E, Perdoceo Education Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KIDZW or GOTU or DUOL or CHGG or PRDO?
Over the past 5 years, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) delivered a total return of +198.
5%, compared to -98. 5% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRDO returned +505. 6% versus GOTU's -81. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KIDZW or GOTU or DUOL or CHGG or PRDO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
48β versus Chegg, Inc. 's 2. 97β — meaning CHGG is approximately 513% more volatile than PRDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 70% for Chegg, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KIDZW or GOTU or DUOL or CHGG or PRDO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is pulling ahead at 56. 0% versus -100. 0% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants (KIDZW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Duolingo, Inc. grew EPS 355. 9% year-over-year, compared to -145. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DUOL leads at 41. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KIDZW or GOTU or DUOL or CHGG or PRDO?
Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 9% net margin versus -53. 2% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Warrants — meaning it keeps 39. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRDO leads at 23. 2% versus -79. 0% for KIDZW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DUOL leads at 72. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KIDZW or GOTU or DUOL or CHGG or PRDO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) trades at 12.
0x forward P/E versus 38. 4x for Duolingo, Inc. — 26. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHGG: 2276. 6% to $30. 42.
08Which pays a better dividend — KIDZW or GOTU or DUOL or CHGG or PRDO?
In this comparison, PRDO (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. KIDZW, GOTU, DUOL, CHGG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KIDZW or GOTU or DUOL or CHGG or PRDO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
48), 1. 6% yield, +505. 6% 10Y return). Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) carries a higher beta of 2. 97 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRDO: +505. 6%, CHGG: -70. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KIDZW and GOTU and DUOL and CHGG and PRDO?
These companies operate in different sectors (KIDZW (Consumer Defensive) and GOTU (Consumer Defensive) and DUOL (Technology) and CHGG (Consumer Defensive) and PRDO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KIDZW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; DUOL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHGG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRDO is a small-cap high-growth stock. PRDO pays a dividend while KIDZW, GOTU, DUOL, CHGG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.