REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KIM vs SITC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
KIM vs SITC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $16.05B | $295M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.16B | $52M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $616M | $38M |
| Gross Margin | 54.7% | 48.2% |
| Operating Margin | 36.1% | -62.6% |
| Forward P/E | 30.8x | 1.7x |
| Total Debt | $8.64B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $213M | $119M |
KIM vs SITC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | 100 | 214.2 | +114.2% |
| SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) | 100 | 24.8 | -75.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIM vs SITC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KIM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 50.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs SITC's -78.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 81.8%, current ratio 1.08x
SITC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.05, yield 100.0%
- Lower P/E (1.7x vs 30.8x)
- 72.1% margin vs KIM's 28.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% FFO/revenue growth vs SITC's -62.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.7x vs 30.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 72.1% margin vs KIM's 28.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs SITC's 1.05 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs KIM's 4.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.4% vs KIM's +20.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.8% ROA vs KIM's 3.1%, ROIC 27.2% vs 3.0% |
KIM vs SITC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KIM vs SITC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KIM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 41.5x SITC's $52M. SITC is the more profitable business, keeping 72.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIM's 28.5%. On growth, KIM holds the edge at +4.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $52M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $17M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $616M | $38M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $844M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.7% | +48.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.1% | -62.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +72.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +39.0% | -21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | -70.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.8% | -102.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SITC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.7x trailing earnings, SITC trades at a 94% valuation discount to KIM's 28.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SITC's 0.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KIM's 17.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16.1B | $295M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24.5B | $176M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.67x | 1.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.83x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.05x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.84x | 0.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.50x | 2.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.52x | 0.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.78x | 15.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SITC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SITC delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $6 for KIM.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +5.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | +27.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +30.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.4B | -$119M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $213M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.6B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.46x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KIM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KIM five years ago would be worth $13,567 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,196 for SITC. Over the past 12 months, SITC leads with a +31.4% total return vs KIM's +20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KIM at 13.2% vs SITC's -29.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.9% | -12.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.4% | +31.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.0% | -64.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.7% | -68.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.3% | -78.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.2% | -29.0% |
Risk & Volatility
KIM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KIM is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SITC's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KIM currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs SITC's 42.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.31 | $13.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.76 | $5.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +42.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.6 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.0M | 778K |
Analyst Outlook
SITC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KIM as "Hold" and SITC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 42.3% upside for SITC (target: $8) vs 1.9% for KIM (target: $24). For income investors, SITC offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs KIM's 4.45%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.25 | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.06 | $6.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +0.0% |
KIM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SITC leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
KIM vs SITC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIM or SITC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the stronger pick with 5.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -62. 7% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) offers the better valuation at 1. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) a "Hold" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KIM or SITC?
On trailing P/E, SITE Centers Corp.
(SITC) is the cheapest at 1. 7x versus Kimco Realty Corporation at 28. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KIM or SITC?
Over the past 5 years, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) delivered a total return of +35.
7%, compared to -68. 0% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KIM returned +12. 3% versus SITC's -78. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KIM or SITC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
54β versus SITE Centers Corp. 's 1. 05β — meaning SITC is approximately 94% more volatile than KIM relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — KIM or SITC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is pulling ahead at 5.
1% versus -62. 7% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kimco Realty Corporation grew EPS 50. 9% year-over-year, compared to -65. 3% for SITE Centers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KIM leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KIM or SITC?
SITE Centers Corp.
(SITC) is the more profitable company, earning 171. 7% net margin versus 27. 3% for Kimco Realty Corporation — meaning it keeps 171. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SITC leads at 171. 7% versus 35. 2% for KIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KIM leads at 54. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KIM or SITC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SITC: 42.
3% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KIM or SITC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 4. 5% for Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM).
09Is KIM or SITC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KIM: +12. 3%, SITC: -78. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KIM and SITC?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KIM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; SITC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.