Leisure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KMRK vs KFRC vs KELYA vs NSIT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Technology Distributors
KMRK vs KFRC vs KELYA vs NSIT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $54M | $744M | $354M | $2.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $1.33B | $3.09B | $8.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $488K | $35M | $-266M | $180M |
| Gross Margin | 13.2% | 27.2% | 26.3% | 22.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.8% | 3.8% | -2.8% | 4.8% |
| Forward P/E | 119.5x | 16.9x | 11.1x | 7.8x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $70M | $159M | $1.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $2M | $33M | $358M |
KMRK vs KFRC vs KELYA vs NSIT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 134.8 | +34.8% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 65.6 | -34.4% |
| Insight Enterprises… (NSIT) | 100 | 169.8 | +69.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KMRK vs KFRC vs KELYA vs NSIT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KMRK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth -47.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, Low D/E 48.9%, current ratio 2.02x
- 8.7% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
- 2.6% margin vs KELYA's -8.6%
KFRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 3.8%
- Beta 0.46, yield 3.8%, current ratio 1.78x
- 3.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs KELYA's 3.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +1.6% vs KMRK's -44.2%
KELYA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NSIT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 254.7% 10Y total return vs KFRC's 182.9%
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 16.9x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.7% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 16.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.6% margin vs KELYA's -8.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs NSIT's 1.38, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs KELYA's 3.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.6% vs KMRK's -44.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 19.1% vs -4.0% |
KMRK vs KFRC vs KELYA vs NSIT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KMRK vs KFRC vs KELYA vs NSIT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KFRC leads in 3 of 6 categories
NSIT leads 1 • KELYA leads 1 • KMRK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NSIT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NSIT is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 444.4x KMRK's $19M. KMRK is the more profitable business, keeping 2.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -8.6%. On growth, NSIT holds the edge at +1.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $1.3B | $3.1B | $8.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $56M | -$54M | $477M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $35M | -$266M | $180M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $43M | $66M | $235M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +27.2% | +26.3% | +22.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +3.8% | -2.8% | +4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +2.6% | -8.6% | +2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +3.3% | +2.1% | +2.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +0.1% | -100.0% | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.2% | -2.1% | +3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
KELYA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.9x trailing earnings, NSIT trades at a 85% valuation discount to KMRK's 119.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NSIT's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KMRK's 63.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $54M | $744M | $354M | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $51M | $812M | $480M | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 119.48x | 20.78x | -1.36x | 17.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.92x | 11.12x | 7.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 63.52x | 14.60x | — | 8.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | 0.56x | 0.08x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 20.85x | 5.81x | 0.35x | 1.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.90x | 3.10x | 9.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NSIT's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NSIT scores 6/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.2% | +27.2% | -24.6% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.8% | +9.2% | -11.3% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +19.1% | -4.0% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.7% | +20.1% | -4.3% | +10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | 0.56x | 0.16x | 0.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $68M | $126M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $2M | $33M | $358M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $70M | $159M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.87x | — | -12.07x | 2.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KFRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NSIT five years ago would be worth $9,043 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,472 for KELYA. Over the past 12 months, KFRC leads with a +1.6% total return vs KMRK's -44.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KFRC at -7.2% vs KMRK's -17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +86.5% | +31.2% | +14.8% | +3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -44.2% | +1.6% | -17.9% | -36.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.2% | -20.1% | -41.3% | -29.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.2% | -16.4% | -55.3% | -9.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.1% | +182.9% | -34.4% | +254.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.7% | -7.2% | -16.3% | -11.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KMRK and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KMRK is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NSIT's 1.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 85.8% from its 52-week high vs KMRK's 50.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.11x | 0.46x | 0.96x | 1.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.50 | $47.48 | $14.94 | $148.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.86 | $24.49 | $7.98 | $63.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.2% | +85.8% | +65.9% | +58.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.6 | 63.2 | 59.1 | 72.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 64K | 298K | 366K | 479K |
Analyst Outlook
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KFRC as "Hold", KELYA as "Buy", NSIT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 74.4% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 0.6% for NSIT (target: $88). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.80% vs KELYA's 3.18%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $71.00 | $15.00 | $87.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 5 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.8% | +3.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 5 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.55 | $0.31 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.8% | +3.5% | +5.7% |
KFRC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). NSIT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
KMRK vs KFRC vs KELYA vs NSIT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KMRK or KFRC or KELYA or NSIT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, K-TECH SOLUTIONS CO LTD (KMRK) is the stronger pick with 8.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Insight Enterprises, Inc. (NSIT) offers the better valuation at 17. 9x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KMRK or KFRC or KELYA or NSIT?
On trailing P/E, Insight Enterprises, Inc.
(NSIT) is the cheapest at 17. 9x versus K-TECH SOLUTIONS CO LTD at 119. 5x. On forward P/E, Insight Enterprises, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KMRK or KFRC or KELYA or NSIT?
Over the past 5 years, Insight Enterprises, Inc.
(NSIT) delivered a total return of -9. 6%, compared to -55. 3% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NSIT returned +254. 7% versus KMRK's -95. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KMRK or KFRC or KELYA or NSIT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), K-TECH SOLUTIONS CO LTD (KMRK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
11β versus Insight Enterprises, Inc. 's 1. 38β — meaning NSIT is approximately 1159% more volatile than KMRK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 96% for Insight Enterprises, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KMRK or KFRC or KELYA or NSIT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), K-TECH SOLUTIONS CO LTD (KMRK) is pulling ahead at 8.
7% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kforce Inc. grew EPS -25. 2% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KELYA leads at -5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KMRK or KFRC or KELYA or NSIT?
K-TECH SOLUTIONS CO LTD (KMRK) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
6% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NSIT leads at 4. 6% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KFRC leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KMRK or KFRC or KELYA or NSIT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Insight Enterprises, Inc.
(NSIT) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for Kforce Inc. — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 74. 4% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KMRK or KFRC or KELYA or NSIT?
In this comparison, KFRC (3.
8% yield), KELYA (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. KMRK, NSIT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KMRK or KFRC or KELYA or NSIT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 3. 8% yield, +182. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +182. 9%, NSIT: +254. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KMRK and KFRC and KELYA and NSIT?
These companies operate in different sectors (KMRK (Consumer Cyclical) and KFRC (Industrials) and KELYA (Industrials) and NSIT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KMRK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NSIT is a small-cap deep-value stock. KFRC, KELYA pay a dividend while KMRK, NSIT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.