Construction Materials
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KNF vs EXP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction Materials
KNF vs EXP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction Materials | Construction Materials |
| Market Cap | $5.04B | $6.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.20B | $2.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $147M | $447M |
| Gross Margin | 18.3% | 29.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 25.4% |
| Forward P/E | 27.8x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.25B | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $123M | $20M |
KNF vs EXP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knife River Corpora… (KNF) | 100 | 242.2 | +142.2% |
| Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) | 100 | 129.9 | +29.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KNF vs EXP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KNF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.5%, EPS growth -22.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- 8.5% revenue growth vs EXP's 0.1%
- -3.4% vs EXP's -5.4%
EXP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.29, yield 0.5%
- 194.5% 10Y total return vs KNF's 125.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.29, Low D/E 87.6%, current ratio 2.73x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.5% revenue growth vs EXP's 0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 27.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs KNF's 4.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.29 vs KNF's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -3.4% vs EXP's -5.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs KNF's 4.0%, ROIC 17.6% vs 9.1% |
KNF vs EXP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KNF vs EXP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KNF and EXP operate at a comparable scale, with $3.2B and $2.3B in trailing revenue. EXP is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KNF's 4.6%. On growth, KNF holds the edge at +16.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $437M | $748M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $147M | $447M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $244M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +29.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +25.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +19.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +10.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.0% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.7% | -0.7% |
Valuation Metrics
EXP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, EXP trades at a 52% valuation discount to KNF's 32.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EXP's 10.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KNF's 12.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.0B | $6.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.2B | $8.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.16x | 15.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.77x | 16.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.87x | 10.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.60x | 3.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.08x | 4.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EXP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXP delivers a 29.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $9 for KNF. KNF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.76x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXP's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXP scores 5/9 vs KNF's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.4% | +29.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +17.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +20.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.76x | 0.88x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $123M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.27x | 9.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KNF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KNF five years ago would be worth $22,530 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,739 for EXP. Over the past 12 months, KNF leads with a -3.4% total return vs EXP's -5.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KNF at 31.1% vs EXP's 10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.0% | +0.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.4% | -5.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.3% | +34.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.3% | +47.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.3% | +194.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.1% | +10.3% |
Risk & Volatility
EXP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXP is the less volatile stock with a 1.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KNF's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 1.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $103.18 | $243.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $58.72 | $171.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.0% | +86.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.6 | 64.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 581K | 390K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KNF as "Buy" and EXP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.4% upside for KNF (target: $100) vs 5.9% for EXP (target: $224). EXP is the only dividend payer here at 0.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $99.75 | $224.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.5% |
EXP leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KNF leads in 1 (Total Returns).
KNF vs EXP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KNF or EXP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Knife River Corporation (KNF) is the stronger pick with 8.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP). Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Knife River Corporation (KNF) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KNF or EXP?
On trailing P/E, Eagle Materials Inc.
(EXP) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus Knife River Corporation at 32. 2x. On forward P/E, Eagle Materials Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KNF or EXP?
Over the past 5 years, Knife River Corporation (KNF) delivered a total return of +125.
3%, compared to +47. 4% for Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXP returned +194. 5% versus KNF's +125. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KNF or EXP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eagle Materials Inc.
(EXP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 29β versus Knife River Corporation's 1. 47β — meaning KNF is approximately 14% more volatile than EXP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Knife River Corporation (KNF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 76% versus 88% for Eagle Materials Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KNF or EXP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Knife River Corporation (KNF) is pulling ahead at 8.
5% versus 0. 1% for Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eagle Materials Inc. grew EPS 1. 2% year-over-year, compared to -22. 3% for Knife River Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, KNF leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KNF or EXP?
Eagle Materials Inc.
(EXP) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus 5. 0% for Knife River Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXP leads at 26. 5% versus 9. 1% for KNF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXP leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KNF or EXP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Eagle Materials Inc.
(EXP) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 27. 8x for Knife River Corporation — 11. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KNF: 12. 4% to $99. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — KNF or EXP?
In this comparison, EXP (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. KNF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KNF or EXP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eagle Materials Inc.
(EXP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 29), +194. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXP: +194. 5%, KNF: +125. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KNF and EXP?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KNF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EXP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.