Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KNTK vs XOM vs CVX vs OXY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
Oil & Gas Integrated
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
KNTK vs XOM vs CVX vs OXY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $3.33B | $620.85B | $364.18B | $53.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.73B | $323.90B | $184.43B | $23.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $228M | $28.84B | $12.30B | $4.71B |
| Gross Margin | 24.8% | 21.7% | 30.4% | 26.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 10.5% | 9.0% | 12.4% |
| Forward P/E | 42.4x | 14.8x | 15.0x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.87B | $43.54B | $46.74B | $23.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $10.68B | $6.47B | $1.99B |
KNTK vs XOM vs CVX vs OXY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kinetik Holdings In… (KNTK) | 100 | 702.3 | +602.3% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 322.2 | +222.2% |
| Chevron Corporation (CVX) | 100 | 199.0 | +99.0% |
| Occidental Petroleu… (OXY) | 100 | 416.6 | +316.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KNTK vs XOM vs CVX vs OXY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KNTK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 157.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.3%
- 19.0% revenue growth vs OXY's -20.3%
- 16.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7%
XOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 105.0% 10Y total return vs CVX's 135.8%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.15, Low D/E 16.3%, current ratio 1.15x
- Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 131.9%)
- +43.9% vs KNTK's +28.0%
CVX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta -0.05, yield 3.8%
- Beta -0.05, yield 3.8%, current ratio 1.15x
OXY is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (13.0x vs 15.0x)
- 20.3% margin vs CVX's 6.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs OXY's -20.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 15.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.3% margin vs CVX's 6.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 131.9%) | |
| Dividends | 16.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.9% vs KNTK's +28.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs KNTK's 4.2%, ROIC 8.6% vs 1.9% |
KNTK vs XOM vs CVX vs OXY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KNTK vs XOM vs CVX vs OXY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OXY leads in 1 of 6 categories
XOM leads 1 • KNTK leads 1 • CVX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OXY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 187.1x KNTK's $1.7B. OXY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CVX's 6.7%. On growth, XOM holds the edge at -1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $323.9B | $184.4B | $23.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $534M | $59.9B | $37.1B | $10.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $228M | $28.8B | $12.3B | $4.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $441M | $23.6B | $16.2B | $3.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +21.7% | +30.4% | +26.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +10.5% | +9.0% | +12.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +8.9% | +6.7% | +20.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +7.3% | +8.8% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.5% | -1.3% | -5.3% | -23.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.4% | -11.0% | -24.5% | +3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KNTK and OXY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.4x trailing earnings, KNTK trades at a 45% valuation discount to OXY's 33.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OXY's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KNTK's 13.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $620.8B | $364.2B | $53.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.2B | $653.7B | $404.5B | $75.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.43x | 21.86x | 27.53x | 33.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 42.44x | 14.79x | 15.02x | 12.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.14x | 10.91x | 10.89x | 6.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.89x | 1.92x | 1.97x | 2.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 2.37x | 1.76x | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 44.78x | 26.29x | 21.95x | 13.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KNTK delivers a 21.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $7 for CVX. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KNTK's 1.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CVX scores 5/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.1% | +10.7% | +7.2% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +6.4% | +4.2% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +8.6% | +6.2% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.5% | +8.9% | +6.6% | +4.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.32x | 0.16x | 0.24x | 0.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.9B | $32.9B | $40.3B | $22.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $10.7B | $6.5B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $43.5B | $46.7B | $24.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.98x | 69.44x | 17.22x | 3.25x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KNTK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $26,464 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,312 for KNTK. Over the past 12 months, XOM leads with a +43.9% total return vs KNTK's +28.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KNTK at 24.7% vs OXY's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.4% | +20.3% | +18.2% | +27.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.0% | +43.9% | +39.5% | +40.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.9% | +44.9% | +26.7% | -4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.1% | +164.6% | +94.0% | +109.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.5% | +105.0% | +135.8% | -7.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.7% | +13.2% | +8.2% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KNTK and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KNTK's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KNTK currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs OXY's 80.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | -0.15x | -0.05x | -0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $51.11 | $176.41 | $214.71 | $67.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.33 | $101.19 | $133.77 | $38.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.8% | +83.0% | +85.0% | +80.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 42.4 | 42.1 | 41.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 18.9M | 11.0M | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KNTK and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KNTK as "Buy", XOM as "Hold", CVX as "Buy", OXY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.5% upside for XOM (target: $160) vs -1.8% for KNTK (target: $48). For income investors, KNTK offers the higher dividend yield at 16.47% vs XOM's 2.73%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $47.57 | $160.43 | $190.93 | $56.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 55 | 53 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +16.5% | +2.7% | +3.8% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 26 | 8 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $7.98 | $4.00 | $6.87 | $1.59 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.3% | +3.3% | +3.3% | 0.0% |
OXY leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). XOM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
KNTK vs XOM vs CVX vs OXY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KNTK or XOM or CVX or OXY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kinetik Holdings Inc.
(KNTK) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK) offers the better valuation at 18. 4x trailing P/E (42. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KNTK or XOM or CVX or OXY?
On trailing P/E, Kinetik Holdings Inc.
(KNTK) is the cheapest at 18. 4x versus Occidental Petroleum Corporation at 33. 5x. On forward P/E, Occidental Petroleum Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KNTK or XOM or CVX or OXY?
Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +164.
6%, compared to +93. 1% for Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CVX returned +135. 8% versus KNTK's -33. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KNTK or XOM or CVX or OXY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Kinetik Holdings Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning KNTK is approximately -508% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 132% for Kinetik Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KNTK or XOM or CVX or OXY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kinetik Holdings Inc.
(KNTK) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -20. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kinetik Holdings Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to -34. 0% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, KNTK leads at 13. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KNTK or XOM or CVX or OXY?
Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) is the more profitable company, earning 11.
0% net margin versus 6. 7% for Chevron Corporation — meaning it keeps 11. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OXY leads at 17. 2% versus 9. 0% for CVX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OXY leads at 33. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KNTK or XOM or CVX or OXY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) trades at 13.
0x forward P/E versus 42. 4x for Kinetik Holdings Inc. — 29. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOM: 9. 5% to $160. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — KNTK or XOM or CVX or OXY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK) offers the highest yield at 16. 5%, versus 2. 7% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM).
09Is KNTK or XOM or CVX or OXY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +105. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +105. 0%, KNTK: -33. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KNTK and XOM and CVX and OXY?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KNTK is a small-cap high-growth stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; CVX is a large-cap income-oriented stock; OXY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.