Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KO vs WMT vs SYY vs PEP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Food Distribution
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
KO vs WMT vs SYY vs PEP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Specialty Retail | Food Distribution | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $337.62B | $1.04T | $34.91B | $213.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $49.28B | $703.06B | $83.57B | $93.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13.70B | $22.91B | $1.74B | $8.24B |
| Gross Margin | 61.7% | 24.9% | 18.5% | 54.1% |
| Operating Margin | 29.3% | 4.1% | 3.6% | 12.2% |
| Forward P/E | 24.1x | 44.7x | 15.9x | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $45.49B | $67.09B | $14.49B | $49.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10.27B | $10.73B | $1.07B | $9.16B |
KO vs WMT vs SYY vs PEP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 168.0 | +68.0% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 132.1 | +32.1% |
| PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) | 100 | 118.8 | +18.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KO vs WMT vs SYY vs PEP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 27.8% margin vs SYY's 2.1%
- 13.1% ROA vs SYY's 6.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs 15.7%
WMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs KO's 111.2%
- 4.7% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
- +32.7% vs SYY's +6.4%
SYY is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.29 vs PEP's 5.53
- Lower P/E (15.9x vs 18.0x), PEG 0.29 vs 5.53
PEP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 25 yrs, beta 0.03, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.03, current ratio 0.85x
- Beta 0.03, yield 3.6%, current ratio 0.85x
- Beta 0.03 vs SYY's 0.47, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 18.0x), PEG 0.29 vs 5.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs SYY's 2.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs SYY's 0.47, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 25-year raise streak, vs SYY's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs SYY's +6.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs SYY's 6.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs 15.7% |
KO vs WMT vs SYY vs PEP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KO vs WMT vs SYY vs PEP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SYY leads in 2 of 6 categories
KO leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • PEP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 14.3x KO's $49.3B. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SYY's 2.1%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $49.3B | $703.1B | $83.6B | $93.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15.5B | $42.8B | $4.0B | $14.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13.7B | $22.9B | $1.7B | $8.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12.6B | $15.3B | $2.0B | $7.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.7% | +24.9% | +18.5% | +54.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.3% | +4.1% | +3.6% | +12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +3.3% | +2.1% | +8.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +2.2% | +2.4% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.1% | +5.8% | +4.7% | +5.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.2% | +35.1% | -13.4% | +66.7% |
Valuation Metrics
SYY leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.5x trailing earnings, SYY trades at a 59% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.36x vs PEP's 7.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $337.6B | $1.04T | $34.9B | $213.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $372.8B | $1.09T | $48.3B | $254.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.80x | 47.69x | 19.54x | 26.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.11x | 44.71x | 15.88x | 18.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.31x | 4.33x | 0.36x | 7.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.17x | 24.85x | 11.58x | 17.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.04x | 1.46x | 0.43x | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.87x | 10.45x | 19.23x | 10.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 63.75x | 24.97x | 19.60x | 27.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $22 for WMT. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs PEP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +41.1% | +22.3% | +80.7% | +40.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.1% | +7.9% | +6.4% | +7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.8% | +14.7% | +15.7% | +14.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.3% | +17.5% | +19.0% | +16.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.33x | 0.67x | 7.81x | 2.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $35.2B | $56.4B | $13.4B | $40.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10.3B | $10.7B | $1.1B | $9.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $45.5B | $67.1B | $14.5B | $49.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.70x | 11.85x | 4.35x | 10.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,614 for SYY. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.7% total return vs SYY's +6.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs PEP's -3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.3% | +15.7% | +1.9% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.2% | +32.7% | +6.4% | +22.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.9% | +160.5% | +4.0% | -10.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.1% | +186.9% | -3.9% | +24.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.2% | +499.5% | +82.2% | +89.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.7% | +37.6% | +1.3% | -3.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KO and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SYY's 0.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs SYY's 79.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.09x | 0.12x | 0.47x | 0.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $82.00 | $134.69 | $91.69 | $171.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $65.35 | $91.89 | $68.19 | $127.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.7% | +96.7% | +79.5% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.7 | 55.9 | 41.7 | 49.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13.4M | 17.2M | 4.7M | 5.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and SYY and PEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KO as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", SYY as "Buy", PEP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.1% upside for SYY (target: $90) vs 5.3% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, PEP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.56% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $85.71 | $137.04 | $90.44 | $174.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 64 | 30 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +0.7% | +2.8% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 35 | 37 | 37 | 25 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.04 | $0.94 | $2.04 | $5.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.8% | +3.6% | +0.5% |
SYY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). KO leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
KO vs WMT vs SYY vs PEP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KO or WMT or SYY or PEP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Sysco Corporation (SYY) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KO or WMT or SYY or PEP?
On trailing P/E, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the cheapest at 19.
5x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Sysco Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KO or WMT or SYY or PEP?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -3. 9% for Sysco Corporation (SYY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus SYY's +82. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KO or WMT or SYY or PEP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
09β versus Sysco Corporation's 0. 47β — meaning SYY is approximately -633% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KO or WMT or SYY or PEP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -13. 7% for PepsiCo, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SYY leads at 5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KO or WMT or SYY or PEP?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 2. 2% for Sysco Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 3. 8% for SYY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KO or WMT or SYY or PEP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sysco Corporation (SYY) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 28. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SYY: 24. 1% to $90. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — KO or WMT or SYY or PEP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is KO or WMT or SYY or PEP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, SYY: +82. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KO and WMT and SYY and PEP?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PEP is a large-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.