Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KO vs WMT vs SYY vs PEP vs CAG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Food Distribution
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Packaged Foods
KO vs WMT vs SYY vs PEP vs CAG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Specialty Retail | Food Distribution | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $337.62B | $1.04T | $34.91B | $213.59B | $6.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $49.28B | $703.06B | $83.57B | $93.92B | $11.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13.70B | $22.91B | $1.74B | $8.24B | $13M |
| Gross Margin | 61.7% | 24.9% | 18.5% | 54.1% | 24.6% |
| Operating Margin | 29.3% | 4.1% | 3.6% | 12.2% | 13.1% |
| Forward P/E | 24.1x | 44.7x | 15.9x | 18.0x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $45.49B | $67.09B | $14.49B | $49.90B | $8.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10.27B | $10.73B | $1.07B | $9.16B | $68M |
KO vs WMT vs SYY vs PEP vs CAG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 168.0 | +68.0% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 132.1 | +32.1% |
| PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) | 100 | 118.8 | +18.8% |
| Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KO vs WMT vs SYY vs PEP vs CAG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 27.8% margin vs CAG's 0.1%
- 13.1% ROA vs CAG's 0.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.0%
WMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs KO's 111.2%
- 4.7% revenue growth vs CAG's -4.8%
- +32.7% vs CAG's -31.5%
SYY is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.29 vs PEP's 5.53
PEP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 25 yrs, beta 0.03, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.03, current ratio 0.85x
- Beta 0.03, yield 3.6%, current ratio 0.85x
- Beta 0.03 vs SYY's 0.47, lower leverage
CAG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 18.0x), PEG 1.21 vs 5.53
- 9.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs SYY's 2.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs CAG's -4.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 18.0x), PEG 1.21 vs 5.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs CAG's 0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs SYY's 0.47, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs SYY's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs CAG's -31.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs CAG's 0.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.0% |
KO vs WMT vs SYY vs PEP vs CAG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KO vs WMT vs SYY vs PEP vs CAG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
CAG leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • SYY leads 0 • PEP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 62.9x CAG's $11.2B. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CAG's 0.1%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $49.3B | $703.1B | $83.6B | $93.9B | $11.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15.5B | $42.8B | $4.0B | $14.3B | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13.7B | $22.9B | $1.7B | $8.2B | $13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12.6B | $15.3B | $2.0B | $7.7B | $634M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.7% | +24.9% | +18.5% | +54.1% | +24.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.3% | +4.1% | +3.6% | +12.2% | +13.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +3.3% | +2.1% | +8.8% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +2.2% | +2.4% | +8.2% | +5.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.1% | +5.8% | +4.7% | +5.6% | -6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.2% | +35.1% | -13.4% | +66.7% | -3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CAG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.0x trailing earnings, CAG trades at a 88% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.36x vs PEP's 7.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $337.6B | $1.04T | $34.9B | $213.6B | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $372.8B | $1.09T | $48.3B | $254.3B | $15.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.80x | 47.69x | 19.54x | 26.05x | 5.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.11x | 44.71x | 15.88x | 18.05x | 8.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.31x | 4.33x | 0.36x | 7.98x | 0.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.17x | 24.85x | 11.58x | 17.78x | 8.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.04x | 1.46x | 0.43x | 2.27x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.87x | 10.45x | 19.23x | 10.43x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 63.75x | 24.97x | 19.60x | 27.84x | 5.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $0 for CAG. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs PEP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +41.1% | +22.3% | +80.7% | +40.1% | +0.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.1% | +7.9% | +6.4% | +7.7% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.8% | +14.7% | +15.7% | +14.9% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.3% | +17.5% | +19.0% | +16.1% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.33x | 0.67x | 7.81x | 2.43x | 0.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $35.2B | $56.4B | $13.4B | $40.7B | $8.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10.3B | $10.7B | $1.1B | $9.2B | $68M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $45.5B | $67.1B | $14.5B | $49.9B | $8.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.70x | 11.85x | 4.35x | 10.34x | 1.56x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,565 for CAG. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.7% total return vs CAG's -31.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs CAG's -21.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.3% | +15.7% | +1.9% | +10.9% | -13.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.2% | +32.7% | +6.4% | +22.8% | -31.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.9% | +160.5% | +4.0% | -10.8% | -50.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.1% | +186.9% | -3.9% | +24.6% | -44.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.2% | +499.5% | +82.2% | +89.2% | -27.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.7% | +37.6% | +1.3% | -3.7% | -21.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KO and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SYY's 0.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs CAG's 61.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.09x | 0.12x | 0.47x | 0.03x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $82.00 | $134.69 | $91.69 | $171.48 | $23.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $65.35 | $91.89 | $68.19 | $127.60 | $13.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.7% | +96.7% | +79.5% | +91.1% | +61.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.7 | 55.9 | 41.7 | 49.9 | 36.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13.4M | 17.2M | 4.7M | 5.7M | 14.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and SYY and CAG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KO as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", SYY as "Buy", PEP as "Hold", CAG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.1% upside for SYY (target: $90) vs 5.3% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, CAG offers the higher dividend yield at 9.75% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $85.71 | $137.04 | $90.44 | $174.00 | $17.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 64 | 30 | 45 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +0.7% | +2.8% | +3.6% | +9.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 35 | 37 | 37 | 25 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.04 | $0.94 | $2.04 | $5.57 | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.8% | +3.6% | +0.5% | +0.9% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CAG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
KO vs WMT vs SYY vs PEP vs CAG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KO or WMT or SYY or PEP or CAG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KO or WMT or SYY or PEP or CAG?
On trailing P/E, Conagra Brands, Inc.
(CAG) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Conagra Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KO or WMT or SYY or PEP or CAG?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -44. 3% for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus CAG's -27. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KO or WMT or SYY or PEP or CAG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
09β versus Sysco Corporation's 0. 47β — meaning SYY is approximately -633% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KO or WMT or SYY or PEP or CAG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -13. 7% for PepsiCo, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SYY leads at 5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KO or WMT or SYY or PEP or CAG?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 2. 2% for Sysco Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 3. 8% for SYY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KO or WMT or SYY or PEP or CAG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 36. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SYY: 24. 1% to $90. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — KO or WMT or SYY or PEP or CAG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) offers the highest yield at 9. 8%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is KO or WMT or SYY or PEP or CAG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, SYY: +82. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KO and WMT and SYY and PEP and CAG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PEP is a large-cap income-oriented stock; CAG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.