Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KORE vs EOLS vs ABBV vs TWLO vs SPOK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - General
Internet Content & Information
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
KORE vs EOLS vs ABBV vs TWLO vs SPOK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - General | Internet Content & Information | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $156M | $421M | $358.42B | $29.86B | $225M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $285M | $301M | $61.16B | $5.30B | $103M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-70M | $-43M | $4.23B | $104M | $11M |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 65.7% | 70.2% | 48.8% | 91.4% |
| Operating Margin | -4.0% | -9.6% | 26.7% | 4.7% | 13.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 14.3x | 36.3x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $307M | $155M | $69.07B | $1.08B | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $54M | $5.23B | $682M | $25M |
KORE vs EOLS vs ABBV vs TWLO vs SPOK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KORE Group Holdings… (KORE) | 100 | 89.7 | -10.3% |
| Evolus, Inc. (EOLS) | 100 | 190.2 | +90.2% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 189.1 | +89.1% |
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | 100 | 58.2 | -41.8% |
| Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) | 100 | 97.3 | -2.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KORE vs EOLS vs ABBV vs TWLO vs SPOK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KORE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +266.4% vs EOLS's -45.7%
Among these 5 stocks, EOLS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ABBV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
- 295.5% 10Y total return vs TWLO's 5.8%
- Lower P/E (14.3x vs 36.3x)
- Beta 0.34 vs TWLO's 1.51
TWLO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.7%, EPS growth 131.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.8%
- 13.7% revenue growth vs SPOK's 1.5%
SPOK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.42, yield 11.9%, current ratio 1.18x
- 10.3% margin vs KORE's -24.5%
- 11.9% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ABBV's 3.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.7% revenue growth vs SPOK's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.3x vs 36.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.3% margin vs KORE's -24.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs TWLO's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 11.9% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ABBV's 3.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +266.4% vs EOLS's -45.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs EOLS's -19.4%, ROIC 11.3% vs -44.5% |
KORE vs EOLS vs ABBV vs TWLO vs SPOK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KORE vs EOLS vs ABBV vs TWLO vs SPOK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 1 of 6 categories
SPOK leads 1 • TWLO leads 1 • KORE leads 1 • EOLS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV is the larger business by revenue, generating $61.2B annually — 591.4x SPOK's $103M. SPOK is the more profitable business, keeping 10.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KORE's -24.5%. On growth, TWLO holds the edge at +20.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $285M | $301M | $61.2B | $5.3B | $103M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $44M | -$21M | $24.5B | $415M | $17M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$70M | -$43M | $4.2B | $104M | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | -$41M | $18.7B | $1.0B | $26M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +65.7% | +70.2% | +48.8% | +91.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | -9.6% | +26.7% | +4.7% | +13.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.5% | -14.4% | +6.9% | +2.0% | +10.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | -13.7% | +30.6% | +19.0% | +24.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.3% | +6.2% | +10.0% | +20.0% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.0% | +46.7% | +57.4% | +3.8% | -64.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SPOK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, SPOK trades at a 98% valuation discount to TWLO's 938.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SPOK's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWLO's 77.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $156M | $421M | $358.4B | $29.9B | $225M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $444M | $522M | $422.3B | $30.3B | $206M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.21x | -7.99x | 85.50x | 938.43x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 14.28x | 36.33x | 16.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 14.96x | 77.16x | 8.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.54x | 1.42x | 5.86x | 5.89x | 1.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | — | 4.03x | 1.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 20.12x | 28.91x | 8.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ABBV and SPOK each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $1 for TWLO. SPOK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TWLO's 0.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TWLO scores 7/9 vs EOLS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | +62.1% | +1.3% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.5% | -19.4% | +3.1% | +1.1% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -30.4% | -44.5% | +23.9% | +1.6% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -22.7% | -23.5% | +21.5% | +1.9% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | — | 0.14x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $288M | $101M | $63.8B | $399M | -$18M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $54M | $5.2B | $682M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $307M | $155M | $69.1B | $1.1B | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.96x | -1.92x | 3.28x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TWLO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $20,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,416 for TWLO. Over the past 12 months, KORE leads with a +266.4% total return vs EOLS's -45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWLO at 53.2% vs EOLS's -10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +105.8% | -4.9% | -10.1% | +42.4% | -14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +266.4% | -45.7% | +11.3% | +90.3% | -26.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.9% | -28.4% | +50.4% | +259.4% | +13.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.4% | -30.1% | +101.3% | -35.8% | +61.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.8% | -44.4% | +295.5% | +584.5% | +13.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.5% | -10.6% | +14.6% | +53.2% | +4.3% |
Risk & Volatility
KORE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KORE is the less volatile stock with a -0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TWLO's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KORE currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs EOLS's 52.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.09x | 1.27x | 0.34x | 1.51x | 0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.21 | $12.16 | $244.81 | $201.39 | $19.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.00 | $3.86 | $176.57 | $91.84 | $9.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.5% | +52.5% | +82.8% | +97.9% | +56.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.2 | 76.1 | 46.8 | 78.4 | 36.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 137K | 1.1M | 5.8M | 2.2M | 185K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ABBV and SPOK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KORE as "Buy", EOLS as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", TWLO as "Buy", SPOK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 134.7% upside for EOLS (target: $15) vs -6.0% for TWLO (target: $185). For income investors, SPOK offers the higher dividend yield at 11.95% vs ABBV's 3.24%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.00 | $256.64 | $185.17 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 13 | 41 | 52 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.2% | — | +11.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 13 | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $6.57 | — | $1.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +2.9% | +1.3% |
ABBV leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SPOK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
KORE vs EOLS vs ABBV vs TWLO vs SPOK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KORE or EOLS or ABBV or TWLO or SPOK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK). Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KORE Group Holdings, Inc. (KORE) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KORE or EOLS or ABBV or TWLO or SPOK?
On trailing P/E, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus Twilio Inc. at 938. 4x. On forward P/E, AbbVie Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KORE or EOLS or ABBV or TWLO or SPOK?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +101. 3%, compared to -35. 8% for Twilio Inc. (TWLO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWLO returned +584. 5% versus EOLS's -44. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KORE or EOLS or ABBV or TWLO or SPOK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KORE Group Holdings, Inc.
(KORE) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 09β versus Twilio Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning TWLO is approximately -1786% more volatile than KORE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 14% for Twilio Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KORE or EOLS or ABBV or TWLO or SPOK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus 1. 5% for Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Twilio Inc. grew EPS 131. 8% year-over-year, compared to -0. 8% for AbbVie Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EOLS leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KORE or EOLS or ABBV or TWLO or SPOK?
Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 4% net margin versus -51. 1% for KORE Group Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -35. 9% for KORE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPOK leads at 78. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KORE or EOLS or ABBV or TWLO or SPOK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 36. 3x for Twilio Inc. — 22. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EOLS: 134. 7% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KORE or EOLS or ABBV or TWLO or SPOK?
In this comparison, SPOK (11.
9% yield), ABBV (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. KORE, EOLS, TWLO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KORE or EOLS or ABBV or TWLO or SPOK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +295. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +295. 5%, EOLS: -44. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KORE and EOLS and ABBV and TWLO and SPOK?
These companies operate in different sectors (KORE (Communication Services) and EOLS (Healthcare) and ABBV (Healthcare) and TWLO (Communication Services) and SPOK (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KORE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EOLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock; TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SPOK is a small-cap deep-value stock. ABBV, SPOK pay a dividend while KORE, EOLS, TWLO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 29%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.