REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KRC vs WELL vs PLD vs EQR vs AVB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
KRC vs WELL vs PLD vs EQR vs AVB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $4.10B | $149.25B | $132.16B | $24.68B | $25.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.11B | $11.63B | $8.74B | $3.12B | $3.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $276M | $1.43B | $3.21B | $954M | $1.05B |
| Gross Margin | 67.0% | 39.1% | 67.7% | 46.3% | 67.0% |
| Operating Margin | 28.4% | 4.4% | 47.0% | 28.5% | 30.1% |
| Forward P/E | 83.5x | 78.4x | 41.4x | 50.6x | 37.7x |
| Total Debt | $4.84B | $21.38B | $31.49B | $8.78B | $9.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $179M | $5.03B | $1.32B | $56M | $187M |
KRC vs WELL vs PLD vs EQR vs AVB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kilroy Realty Corpo… (KRC) | 100 | 60.5 | -39.5% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 420.4 | +320.4% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 155.5 | +55.5% |
| Equity Residential (EQR) | 100 | 108.8 | +8.8% |
| AvalonBay Communiti… (AVB) | 100 | 119.1 | +19.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KRC vs WELL vs PLD vs EQR vs AVB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 6.3% yield, vs PLD's 2.6%
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- Beta 0.13, yield 1.3%, current ratio 5.34x
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs KRC's -2.0%
PLD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 259.1% 10Y total return vs WELL's 223.1%
- PEG 3.83 vs KRC's 11.42
- 36.7% margin vs WELL's 12.3%
EQR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 4.1%
AVB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and efficiency is your priority.
- Lower P/E (37.7x vs 50.6x), PEG 8.06 vs 9.94
- 4.8% ROA vs WELL's 2.3%, ROIC 3.3% vs 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs KRC's -2.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (37.7x vs 50.6x), PEG 8.06 vs 9.94 | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.7% margin vs WELL's 12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs KRC's 0.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield, vs PLD's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs AVB's -7.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs WELL's 2.3%, ROIC 3.3% vs 0.5% |
KRC vs WELL vs PLD vs EQR vs AVB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KRC vs WELL vs PLD vs EQR vs AVB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PLD leads in 1 of 6 categories
KRC leads 1 • EQR leads 1 • WELL leads 1 • AVB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 10.5x KRC's $1.1B. PLD is the more profitable business, keeping 36.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WELL's 12.3%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $11.6B | $8.7B | $3.1B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $661M | $2.8B | $6.7B | $1.9B | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $276M | $1.4B | $3.2B | $954M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $2.5B | $5.2B | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.0% | +39.1% | +67.7% | +46.3% | +67.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +4.4% | +47.0% | +28.5% | +30.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +12.3% | +36.7% | +30.6% | +34.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | +21.9% | +59.3% | +42.7% | +49.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.9% | +40.3% | +8.7% | +2.5% | +3.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -78.0% | +22.5% | -24.1% | -64.2% | -40.9% |
Valuation Metrics
KRC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.9x trailing earnings, KRC trades at a 90% valuation discount to WELL's 153.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KRC offers better value at 2.04x vs AVB's 5.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.1B | $149.2B | $132.2B | $24.7B | $25.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.8B | $165.6B | $162.3B | $33.4B | $35.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.90x | 153.25x | 35.49x | 22.63x | 25.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 83.54x | 78.42x | 41.39x | 50.61x | 37.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.04x | — | 3.28x | 4.44x | 5.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.27x | 66.40x | 23.20x | 15.61x | 19.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.68x | 13.99x | 16.11x | 7.96x | 8.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.73x | 3.35x | 2.32x | 2.24x | 2.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 52.41x | 26.90x | 19.13x | 18.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EQR leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AVB delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $3 for WELL. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRC's 0.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs AVB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.9% | +3.5% | +5.6% | +8.4% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | +2.3% | +3.3% | +4.6% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +0.5% | +3.8% | +4.2% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +0.6% | +4.8% | +5.7% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.86x | 0.49x | 0.54x | 0.77x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.7B | $16.3B | $30.2B | $8.7B | $9.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $179M | $5.0B | $1.3B | $56M | $187M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.8B | $21.4B | $31.5B | $8.8B | $9.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.51x | 0.26x | 5.27x | 5.58x | 5.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,675 for KRC. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +42.7% total return vs AVB's -7.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs AVB's 4.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.7% | +14.3% | +11.1% | +8.4% | +3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.1% | +42.7% | +39.4% | -2.7% | -7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.3% | +189.5% | +20.8% | +17.5% | +14.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.2% | +202.3% | +37.7% | +6.7% | +12.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.3% | +223.1% | +259.1% | +29.3% | +31.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.5% | +42.5% | +6.5% | +5.5% | +4.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WELL and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KRC's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLD currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs KRC's 76.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 0.13x | 0.73x | 0.38x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.03 | $219.59 | $145.44 | $71.80 | $209.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.36 | $142.65 | $103.02 | $57.58 | $160.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.8% | +97.0% | +97.8% | +91.7% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.3 | 60.2 | 58.4 | 69.8 | 71.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 2.6M | 3.1M | 2.4M | 940K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KRC and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KRC as "Hold", WELL as "Buy", PLD as "Buy", EQR as "Hold", AVB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.1% upside for KRC (target: $38) vs 1.5% for PLD (target: $144). For income investors, KRC offers the higher dividend yield at 6.27% vs WELL's 1.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.71 | $226.50 | $144.43 | $70.15 | $191.70 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 34 | 42 | 46 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.3% | +1.3% | +2.6% | +4.1% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.17 | $2.76 | $3.74 | $2.69 | $6.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +1.1% | +1.9% |
PLD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). KRC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
KRC vs WELL vs PLD vs EQR vs AVB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KRC or WELL or PLD or EQR or AVB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) offers the better valuation at 14. 9x trailing P/E (83. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KRC or WELL or PLD or EQR or AVB?
On trailing P/E, Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) is the cheapest at 14.
9x versus Welltower Inc. at 153. 3x. On forward P/E, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. is actually cheaper at 37. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Prologis, Inc. wins at 3. 83x versus Kilroy Realty Corporation's 11. 42x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KRC or WELL or PLD or EQR or AVB?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -33. 2% for Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLD returned +259. 1% versus KRC's -14. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KRC or WELL or PLD or EQR or AVB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Kilroy Realty Corporation's 0. 83β — meaning KRC is approximately 522% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 86% for Kilroy Realty Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KRC or WELL or PLD or EQR or AVB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus -2. 0% for Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kilroy Realty Corporation grew EPS 31. 1% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KRC or WELL or PLD or EQR or AVB?
Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 5% net margin versus 8. 8% for Welltower Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53. 8% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLD leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KRC or WELL or PLD or EQR or AVB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Prologis, Inc. (PLD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 83x versus Kilroy Realty Corporation's 11. 42x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB) trades at 37. 7x forward P/E versus 83. 5x for Kilroy Realty Corporation — 45. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KRC: 9. 1% to $37. 71.
08Which pays a better dividend — KRC or WELL or PLD or EQR or AVB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) offers the highest yield at 6. 3%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is KRC or WELL or PLD or EQR or AVB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +223. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +223. 1%, KRC: -14. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KRC and WELL and PLD and EQR and AVB?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KRC is a small-cap deep-value stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EQR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; AVB is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.