Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
KRKR vs BIDU vs SOHU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
KRKR vs BIDU vs SOHU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $6M | $48.92B | $475M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $340M | $130.46B | $577M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-91M | $9.00B | $149M |
| Gross Margin | 53.5% | 44.7% | 76.9% |
| Operating Margin | -27.7% | -2.6% | -9.2% |
| Forward P/E | 0.1x | 2.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $30M | $79.32B | $38M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $24.83B | $160M |
KRKR vs BIDU vs SOHU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36Kr Holdings Inc. (KRKR) | 100 | 3.2 | -96.8% |
| Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) | 100 | 131.3 | +31.3% |
| Sohu.com Limited (SOHU) | 100 | 235.8 | +135.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KRKR vs BIDU vs SOHU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KRKR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
BIDU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -1.1%, EPS growth 19.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.3%
- -17.5% 10Y total return vs SOHU's -61.9%
- +61.3% vs KRKR's -29.6%
SOHU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.71
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 4.1%, current ratio 3.24x
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 3.24x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.4% revenue growth vs KRKR's -32.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.9% margin vs KRKR's -26.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs BIDU's 1.41, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.3% vs KRKR's -29.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.8% ROA vs KRKR's -18.8%, ROIC -10.7% vs -30.9% |
KRKR vs BIDU vs SOHU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KRKR vs BIDU vs SOHU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOHU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIDU is the larger business by revenue, generating $130.5B annually — 383.5x KRKR's $340M. SOHU is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KRKR's -26.6%. On growth, SOHU holds the edge at +18.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $340M | $130.5B | $577M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$92M | $4.9B | -$22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$91M | $9.0B | $149M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $253,372 | -$15.7B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | +44.7% | +76.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | -2.6% | -9.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -26.6% | +6.9% | +25.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | -12.0% | -11.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.0% | -7.1% | +18.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | -2.6% | +161.5% |
Valuation Metrics
KRKR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $48.9B | $475M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5M | $56.9B | $353M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.31x | 14.44x | -5.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.10x | 2.58x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.24x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.79x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.18x | 2.50x | 0.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.36x | 1.17x | 0.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 25.41x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SOHU leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SOHU delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-32 for KRKR. SOHU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIDU's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIDU scores 5/9 vs KRKR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -31.6% | +3.1% | +14.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.8% | +2.0% | +8.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -30.9% | +4.8% | -10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -37.1% | +6.3% | -7.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.28x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | $54.5B | -$122M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $24.8B | $160M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $79.3B | $38M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.71x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SOHU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SOHU five years ago would be worth $8,812 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $652 for KRKR. Over the past 12 months, BIDU leads with a +61.3% total return vs KRKR's -29.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOHU at 4.6% vs KRKR's -43.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.3% | -6.9% | -0.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.6% | +61.3% | +50.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.7% | +14.2% | +14.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | -27.0% | -11.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | -17.5% | -61.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -43.2% | +4.5% | +4.6% |
Risk & Volatility
SOHU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SOHU is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIDU's 1.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SOHU currently trades 91.3% from its 52-week high vs KRKR's 17.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 1.41x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.36 | $165.30 | $17.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.87 | $81.17 | $9.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +17.5% | +84.6% | +91.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 69.1 | 53.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 2.0M | 47K |
Analyst Outlook
BIDU leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KRKR as "Buy", BIDU as "Buy", SOHU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.6% upside for SOHU (target: $20) vs 10.6% for BIDU (target: $155).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $154.70 | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 53 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.9% | +8.6% |
SOHU leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KRKR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
KRKR vs BIDU vs SOHU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KRKR or BIDU or SOHU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sohu.
com Limited (SOHU) is the stronger pick with -0. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 1% for 36Kr Holdings Inc. (KRKR). Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (2. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate 36Kr Holdings Inc. (KRKR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KRKR or BIDU or SOHU?
On forward P/E, 36Kr Holdings Inc.
is actually cheaper at 0. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KRKR or BIDU or SOHU?
Over the past 5 years, Sohu.
com Limited (SOHU) delivered a total return of -11. 9%, compared to -93. 5% for 36Kr Holdings Inc. (KRKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BIDU returned -17. 5% versus KRKR's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KRKR or BIDU or SOHU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sohu.
com Limited (SOHU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Baidu, Inc. 's 1. 41β — meaning BIDU is approximately 98% more volatile than SOHU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sohu. com Limited (SOHU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 28% for Baidu, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KRKR or BIDU or SOHU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sohu.
com Limited (SOHU) is pulling ahead at -0. 4% versus -32. 1% for 36Kr Holdings Inc. (KRKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Baidu, Inc. grew EPS 19. 6% year-over-year, compared to -251. 7% for Sohu. com Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, BIDU leads at 2. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KRKR or BIDU or SOHU?
Baidu, Inc.
(BIDU) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -59. 1% for 36Kr Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIDU leads at 16. 0% versus -33. 7% for KRKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SOHU leads at 72. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KRKR or BIDU or SOHU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, 36Kr Holdings Inc.
(KRKR) trades at 0. 1x forward P/E versus 2. 6x for Baidu, Inc. — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOHU: 26. 6% to $20. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KRKR or BIDU or SOHU?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is KRKR or BIDU or SOHU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sohu.
com Limited (SOHU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOHU: -61. 9%, BIDU: -17. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KRKR and BIDU and SOHU?
These companies operate in different sectors (KRKR (Communication Services) and BIDU (Communication Services) and SOHU (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KRKR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BIDU is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SOHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 32%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare BIDU vs GOOGL
GOOGL is one of the most direct listed alternatives to BIDU.
Compare SOHU vs NTES
NTES is one of the most direct listed alternatives to SOHU.
Expand With NTES + BABA
NTES and BABA are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.